Literature DB >> 21492180

Effectiveness and cost analysis of "just-in-time" salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics.

Jie Li1, Ellie Hamilton, Louette Vaughn, Michael Graiser, Heather Renfroe, Mary Jo Lechowicz, Amelia Langston, Jefferson Mark Prichard, Darlene Anderson, Charise Gleason, Sagar Lonial, Christopher R Flowers, Jonathan L Kaufman, Edmund K Waller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plerixafor is a recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CXCR4 antagonist, which is combined with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to facilitate stem cell mobilization of lymphoma and myeloma patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness and the related costs of a "just-in-time" strategy of plerixafor administration, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing 148 consecutive lymphoma and myeloma patients in whom mobilization was attempted during 2008 before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of plerixafor with 188 consecutive patients mobilized during 2009 after FDA approval.
RESULTS: Plerixafor was administered to 64 of 188 patients considered to be at risk for mobilization failure due to either their medical history ("high risk," n = 23) or the occurrence of peripheral blood CD34+ count of fewer than 15 × 10(6) cells/L with a white blood cell count of greater than 10 × 10(9) cells/L after at least 5 days of G-CSF administration (just-in-time, n = 41). The success rates of collecting a minimum transplant CD34+ cell dose (≥2 × 10(6) cells/kg) or target cell dose (≥5 × 10(6) lymphoma or ≥10 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg myeloma) in the just-in-time patients compared favorably with the 36 poor mobilizers collected with G-CSF alone: 93% versus 72% and 42% versus 22%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of plerixafor in selected high-risk patients and poor mobilizers did not increase the total charges associated with stem cell collection when compared with poor mobilizers treated with G-CSF alone. The targeted use of plerixafor increased the overall success rate of mobilizing a minimum number of CD34+ cells from 93% to 98% in patients with hematologic malignancies scheduled for autotransplant and increased the overall charges associated with stem cell collection in all patients by an average of 17%.
© 2011 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21492180     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03136.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  21 in total

1.  The effective use of plerixafor as a real-time rescue strategy for patients poorly mobilizing autologous CD34(+) cells.

Authors:  Ajay K Gopal; Mehdi Karami; JoAl Mayor; Mylene Macebeo; Michael Linenberger; William I Bensinger; Leona Holmberg
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.

Authors:  Lauren Veltri; Aaron Cumpston; Alexandra Shillingburg; Sijin Wen; Jin Luo; Sonia Leadmon; Kathy Watkins; Michael Craig; Mehdi Hamadani; Abraham S Kanate
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.414

3.  Effectiveness of etoposide chemomobilization in lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT.

Authors:  W A Wood; J Whitley; R Goyal; P M Brown; A Sharf; R Irons; K V Rao; A Essenmacher; J S Serody; J M Coghill; P M Armistead; S Sarantopoulos; D A Gabriel; T C Shea
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  New molecule for mobilizing marrow stem cells.

Authors:  Sakura Hosoba; Edmund K Waller
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Current clinical indications for plerixafor.

Authors:  Stefan Fruehauf
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 6.  A plerixafor-based strategy allows adequate hematopoietic stem cell collection in poor mobilizers: results from the Canadian Special Access Program.

Authors:  D Sheppard; C Bredeson; L Huebsch; D Allan; J Tay
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 7.  Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Clinical experience with plerixafor as a mobilization regimen for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Ignacio García-Escobar; Lucía Parrilla; Laura Montejano Ortega; Daniel Castellanos; María Ángeles Montalbán Pallarés; Hernán Cortés-Funés
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-29

9.  Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma comparison of two consecutive regimens in a limited resources country.

Authors:  N Ben Abdejlil; D Belloumi; M Mâammar; R El Fatimi; L Torjman; A Lakhal; F Jenhani; S Hmida; T Ben Othman; S Ladeb
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  The impact of recent vincristine on human hematopoietic progenitor cell collection in pediatric patients with central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Laura Cooling; Melissa Bombery; Sandra Hoffmann; Robertson Davenport; Patricia Robertson; John E Levine
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.