Literature DB >> 22298418

The effective use of plerixafor as a real-time rescue strategy for patients poorly mobilizing autologous CD34(+) cells.

Ajay K Gopal1, Mehdi Karami, JoAl Mayor, Mylene Macebeo, Michael Linenberger, William I Bensinger, Leona Holmberg.   

Abstract

Plerixafor enhances CD34(+) cell mobilization, however, its optimal use is unknown. We hypothesized that plerixafor could "rescue" patients in the midst of mobilization when factors indicated a poor CD34(+) yield. Of 295 consecutive autologous peripheral blood mobilization attempts at our center, 39 (13%) used plerixafor as rescue strategy due to a CD34(+) cell concentration <10/μl (median 5.95/μl, n = 30), low CD34(+) cell yield from prior apheresis day (median 1.06 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, n = 7), or other (n = 2). Patients received a median of one plerixafor dose (range: 1-4). Thirty-four (87%) collected =2 × 10 (6) CD34(+) cells/kg and 26 (67%) collected =4 × 10 (6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Median collections for lymphoma (n = 24) and myeloma (n = 15) patients were 4.1 × 10(6) and 8.3 × 10(6) CD34/kg, respectively. A single dose of plerixafor was associated with an increase in the mean peripheral blood CD34(+) concentration of 17.2 cells/μl (P < 0.001) and mean increased CD34(+) cell yield following a single apheresis of 5.11 × 10(6) /kg (P < 0.03). A real-time rescue use of plerixafor is feasible and may allow targeted use of this agent. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298418      PMCID: PMC4004340          DOI: 10.1002/jca.21206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  29 in total

1.  Change in CD34+ cell concentration during peripheral blood progenitor cell collection: effects on collection efficiency and efficacy.

Authors:  Clyde D Ford; Jay Greenwood; Annie Strupp; Chris M Lehman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin's disease: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Norbert Schmitz; Beate Pfistner; Michael Sextro; Markus Sieber; Angelo M Carella; Matthias Haenel; Friederike Boissevain; Reinhart Zschaber; Peter Müller; Hartmut Kirchner; Andreas Lohri; Susanne Decker; Bettina Koch; Dirk Hasenclever; Anthony H Goldstone; Volker Diehl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Impact of frontline fludarabine and cyclophosphamide combined treatment on peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Olivier Tournilhac; Bruno Cazin; Stéphane Leprètre; Marine Diviné; Karim Maloum; Alain Delmer; Bernard Grosbois; Pierre Feugier; Frederic Maloisel; Florence Villard; Bruno Villemagne; Dominique Bastit; Karim Belhadj; Nabi Azar; Mauricette Michallet; Geraud Manhès; Philippe Travade
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Plerixafor with and without chemotherapy in poor mobilizers: results from the German compassionate use program.

Authors:  K Hübel; M M Fresen; H Salwender; N Basara; R Beier; S Theurich; M Christopeit; C Bogner; O Galm; R Hartwig; F Heits; F Lordick; W Rösler; D Wehler; A R Zander; M H Albert; S Dressler; M Ebinger; N Frickhofen; B Hertenstein; M Kiehl; S Liebler; M von Lilienfeld-Toal; E Weidmann; C Weigelt; F Lange; N Kröger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to harvest circulating haemopoietic stem cells for autotransplantation.

Authors:  A M Gianni; S Siena; M Bregni; C Tarella; A C Stern; A Pileri; G Bonadonna
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide: a highly effective cytoreduction and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  C H Moskowitz; J R Bertino; J R Glassman; E E Hedrick; S Hunte; N Coady-Lyons; D B Agus; A Goy; J Jurcic; A Noy; J O'Brien; C S Portlock; D S Straus; B Childs; R Frank; J Yahalom; D Filippa; D Louie; S D Nimer; A D Zelenetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Efficacy of pre-emptively used plerixafor in patients mobilizing poorly after chemomobilization: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Esa Jantunen; Taru Kuittinen; Eija Mahlamäki; Marja Pyörälä; Pentti Mäntymaa; Tapio Nousiainen
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Trafficking of CD34+ cells into the peripheral circulation during collection of peripheral blood stem cells by apheresis.

Authors:  S D Rowley; J Yu; T Gooley; S Heimfeld; L Holmberg; D Maloney; W I Bensinger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Rapid mobilization of CD34+ cells following administration of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 to patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Steven M Devine; Neal Flomenberg; David H Vesole; Jane Liesveld; Daniel Weisdorf; Karin Badel; Gary Calandra; John F DiPersio
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Prediction of mobilisation failure in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  T Kuittinen; T Nousiainen; P Halonen; E Mahlamäki; E Jantunen
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.483

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.

Authors:  Lauren Veltri; Aaron Cumpston; Alexandra Shillingburg; Sijin Wen; Jin Luo; Sonia Leadmon; Kathy Watkins; Michael Craig; Mehdi Hamadani; Abraham S Kanate
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.414

2.  Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma comparison of two consecutive regimens in a limited resources country.

Authors:  N Ben Abdejlil; D Belloumi; M Mâammar; R El Fatimi; L Torjman; A Lakhal; F Jenhani; S Hmida; T Ben Othman; S Ladeb
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Just-in-time rescue plerixafor in combination with chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

Authors:  Veronica R Smith; Uday Popat; Stefan Ciurea; Yago Nieto; Paolo Anderlini; Gabriela Rondon; Amin Alousi; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Partow Kebriaei; Issa Khouri; Marcos de Lima; Richard Champlin; Chitra Hosing
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Phase 2 trial of intravenously administered plerixafor for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma following lenalidomide-based initial therapy.

Authors:  S K Kumar; J Mikhael; B Laplant; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; D Dingli; M A Gertz; K Laumann; T Miceli; M Mahlman; L P Bergsagel; S R Hayman; C Reeder; A K Stewart; A Dispenzieri; D A Gastineau; J L Winters
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.483

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.