Literature DB >> 21491103

Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Manabu Kawai1, Satoshi Kondo, Hiroki Yamaue, Keita Wada, Keiji Sano, Fuyuhiko Motoi, Michiaki Unno, Sohei Satoi, A-Hon Kwon, Takashi Hatori, Masakazu Yamamoto, Joe Matsumoto, Yoshiaki Murakami, Ryuichiro Doi, Masahiro Ito, Shuichi Miyakawa, Hiroyuki Shinchi, Shoji Natsugoe, Hisatoshi Nakagawara, Tetsuo Ohta, Tadahiro Takada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: It is important to predict the development of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) in the early period after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study has been carried out as a project study of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHPBS) to evaluate the predictive factors associated with clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C).
METHOD: The data of 1,239 patients from 11 medical institutions who had undergone PD between July 2005 and June 2009 were retrospectively analyzed to review patient characteristics and perioperative and postoperative parameters.
RESULTS: A drain amylase level >4,000 IU/L on postoperative day (POD) 1 was proposed as the cut-off level to predict clinical relevant pancreatic fistula by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this cut-off level were 62.2, 89.0, and 84.8%, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that male [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, P = 0.039], intraoperative bleeding >1,000 ml (OR 2.5, P = 0.001), soft pancreas (OR 2.7, P = 0.001), and drain amylase level on POD 1 >4,000 IU/L (OR 8.6, P < 0.001) were the significant predictive factors for clinical pancreatic fistula.
CONCLUSION: The four predictive risk factors identified here can provide useful information useful for tailoring postoperative management of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21491103     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-011-0373-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  66 in total

1.  Percutaneous biliary drainage is oncologically inferior to endoscopic drainage: a propensity score matching analysis in resectable distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kenichi Komaya; Tomoki Ebata; Yasuyuki Fukami; Eiji Sakamoto; Hideo Miyake; Daisuke Takara; Kenji Wakai; Masato Nagino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Tobacco Smoking Associated With Increased Anastomotic Disruption Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Alessandra Landmann; Casey S Butler; Morgan M Bonds; Laura E Fischer; Russell G Postier; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Preoperative Nutritional Assessment Using the Controlling Nutritional Status Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masashi Utsumi; Hideki Aoki; Seichi Nagahisa; Seitaro Nishimura; Yuta Une; Yuji Kimura; Fumitaka Taniguchi; Takashi Arata; Koh Katsuda; Kohji Tanakaya
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  32 Consecutive Cases of Whipple's Operation with Single-Layer End to Side Dunking Pancreatojejunostomy Without Any Pancreatic Fistula: Our Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Ashutosh Gupta; Sourabh Nandi; Santanu Tiwari; Amit Choraria; Vivek Chaudhary
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-26

5.  Preoperative body mass index-to-prognostic nutritional index ratio predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Norihiro Sato; Toshihisa Tamura; Noritaka Minagawa; Keiji Hirata
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vladimir D Dugalic; Djordje M Knezevic; Vladan N Obradovic; Miroslava G Gojnic-Dugalic; Slavko V Matic; Aleksandra R Pavlovic-Markovic; Predrag D Dugalic; Srbislav M Knezevic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Arterial, but Not Venous, Reconstruction Increases 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sara L Zettervall; Tammy Ju; Jeremy L Holzmacher; Bridget Huysman; Gregor Werba; Anton Sidawy; Paul Lin; Khashayar Vaziri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The Effect of Pancreaticojejunostomy Technique on Fistula Formation Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Soft Pancreas.

Authors:  Lisbi Rivas; Sara L Zettervall; Tammy Ju; Samantha Olafson; Jeremy Holzmacher; Paul P Lin; Khashayar Vaziri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Tarek Salah; Ahmad Sultan; Mohamed El Hemaly; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Emad Hamdy; Ehab Atef; Ehab El Hanafy; Ahmed El-Geidie; Mohamed Abdel Wahab; Talaat Abdallah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.