Literature DB >> 21490447

MUC expression in hyperplastic and serrated colonic polyps: lack of specificity of MUC6.

Joanna A Gibson1, Hejin P Hahn, Ali Shahsafaei, Robert D Odze.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that hyperplastic and serrated polyps of the colon show variable degrees of gastric and intestinal differentiation. MUCs are a class of approximately 20 genes that encode high-molecular-weight glycoproteins, or mucopolysaccharides, that are widely expressed in epithelial cells and show organ specificity. The role of MUC in serrated carcinogenesis is unknown. One previously published study suggested that expression of MUC6 is specific for sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) and thus can be used to distinguish these lesions from hyperplastic polyps (HPs). However, data from our group suggest that MUC antibodies are not reliable in this differential diagnosis. The aims of this study were to systematically evaluate the expression of MUCs in serrated colon polyps and to determine the efficacy of MUC expression in differentiating HPs from SSA/Ps specifically. Routinely processed specimens from 182 serrated polyps [58 HPs, 46 SSA/Ps, 59 SSA/Ps with dysplasia (SSA/P-D), 19 traditional serrated adenomas, and 38 conventional tubular or tubulovillous adenomas (CAs)] were immunohistochemically stained with MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6, and scored for extent, intensity, and location of staining within the polyps. HPs were further subclassified into goblet cell type (N=18), microvesicular type (N=21), and mucin-depleted type (N=19). The data were compared between the different polyp groups and between polyps from different anatomic locations in the colon. MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 were expressed in 27%, 100%, 100%, and 72% of serrated polyps overall. These antibodies were positive in 32%, 100%, 100%, and 43% of CAs. Expression levels of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC were not significantly different between any of the polyp subgroups or between serrated polyps and CAs. Both SSA/P and SSA/P-D showed a significantly higher percentage of polyps that stained with MUC6, and a greater degree and intensity of staining for this peptide in comparison with HPs. Overall, 91% of SSA/Ps and 84% of SSA/P-Ds were positive for MUC6 in comparison with 60% of HPs (P<0.001 and P=0.02, respectively). Although polyps from both the left and right colon from each polyp group showed positivity for MUC6, a significantly higher proportion of SSA/P-Ds and traditional serrated adenomas from the right colon showed MUC6 positivity compared with those from the left. No differences were noted in MUC6 staining between each of the 3 HP subgroups. On the basis of these data, we conclude that SSA/P and SSA/P-D show increased expression of MUC6 compared with HPs; however, because of overlap in the presence, degree, and intensity of staining, use of MUC6 to differentiate HPs from SSA/P or SSA/P-D in individual cases is not reliable because of a lack of specificity. Differences in MUC6 expression between right-sided and left-sided colonic polyps supports the theory that there may be biological differences in the progression of malignancy in different portions of the colon with regard to the serrated pathway of carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21490447     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821537a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Serrated precursor lesions].

Authors:  G B Baretton; D E Aust
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Endoscopic analysis of colorectal serrated lesions with cancer.

Authors:  Shuichiro Nagata; Keiichi Mitsuyama; Hiroshi Kawano; Tetsuhiro Noda; Yasuhiko Maeyama; Michita Mukasa; Hidetoshi Takedatsu; Shinichiro Yoshioka; Kotaro Kuwaki; Jun Akiba; Osamu Tsuruta; Takuji Torimura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Contrast coating for the surface of flat polyps at CT colonography: a marker for detection.

Authors:  David H Kim; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; B Dustin Pooler; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Different lipid metabolic profiles and their associated genes in sessile serrated adenoma or polyps compared to hyperplastic polyps.

Authors:  Chaotao Tang; Jun Li; Zhenzhen Yang; Youxiang Chen; Chunyan Zeng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.942

5.  Aberrant expression of annexin A10 is closely related to gastric phenotype in serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jia-Huei Tsai; Yu-Lin Lin; Yi-Chen Cheng; Chien-Chuan Chen; Liang-In Lin; Li-Hui Tseng; Mei-Ling Cheng; Jau-Yu Liau; Yung-Ming Jeng
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  Pathological features of the sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with special references of its carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ryo Wada; Toshio Morimoto; Tatsuya Inayoshi
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Loss of Hes1 Differentiates Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp From Hyperplastic Polyp.

Authors:  Min Cui; Amad Awadallah; Wendy Liu; Lan Zhou; Wei Xin
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Agrin in the Muscularis Mucosa Serves as a Biomarker Distinguishing Hyperplastic Polyps from Sessile Serrated Lesions.

Authors:  Vikram Deshpande; Richard O Hynes; Steffen Rickelt; Charlene Condon; Miyeko Mana; Charlie Whittaker; Christina Pfirschke; Jatin Roper; Deepa T Patil; Ian Brown; Anthony R Mattia; Lawrence Zukerberg; Qing Zhao; Runjan Chetty; Gregory Y Lauwers; Azfar Neyaz; Lieve G J Leijssen; Katherine Boylan; Omer H Yilmaz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Platform-independent gene expression signature differentiates sessile serrated adenomas/polyps and hyperplastic polyps of the colon.

Authors:  Yasir Rahmatallah; Magomed Khaidakov; Keith K Lai; Hannah E Goyne; Laura W Lamps; Curt H Hagedorn; Galina Glazko
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Western Blotting Inaccuracies with Unverified Antibodies: Need for a Western Blotting Minimal Reporting Standard (WBMRS).

Authors:  Jennifer E Gilda; Rajeshwary Ghosh; Jenice X Cheah; Toni M West; Sue C Bodine; Aldrin V Gomes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.