Literature DB >> 21489979

PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization.

F Fiorentino1, L Spizzichino, S Bono, A Biricik, G Kokkali, L Rienzi, F M Ubaldi, E Iammarrone, A Gordon, K Pantos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most widely used method for detecting unbalanced chromosome rearrangements in preimplantation embryos but it is known to have several technical limitations. We describe the clinical application of a molecular-based assay, array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH), to simultaneously screen for unbalanced translocation derivatives and aneuploidy of all 24 chromosomes.
METHODS: Cell biopsy was carried out on cleavage-stage embryos (Day 3). Single cells were first lysed and DNA amplified by whole-genome amplification (WGA). WGA products were then processed by array-CGH using 24sure + arrays, BlueGnome. Balanced/normal euploid embryos were then selected for transfer on Day 5 of the same cycle.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight consecutive cycles of preimplantation genetic diagnosis were carried out for 24 couples carrying 18 different balanced translocations. Overall, 187/200 (93.5%) embryos were successfully diagnosed. Embryos suitable for transfer were identified in 17 cycles (60.7%), with transfer of 22 embryos (mean 1.3 ± 0.5). Twelve couples achieved a clinical pregnancy (70.6% per embryo transfer), with a total of 14 embryos implanted (63.6% per transferred embryo). Three patients delivered three healthy babies, during writing, the other pregnancies (two twins and seven singletons) are ongoing beyond 20 weeks of gestation.
CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained demonstrate that array-CGH can detect chromosome imbalances in embryos, also providing the added benefit of simultaneous aneuploidy screening of all 24 chromosomes. Array-CGH has the potential to overcome several inherent limitations of FISH-based tests, providing improvements in terms of test performance, automation, sensitivity and reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21489979     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  62 in total

1.  Microarray analysis of copy number variation in single cells.

Authors:  Peter Konings; Evelyne Vanneste; Sigrun Jackmaert; Michèle Ampe; Geert Verbeke; Yves Moreau; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations.

Authors:  Chris M J van Uum; Servi J C Stevens; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Hubert J Smeets; Bertien Hollanders-Crombach; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Joep P M Geraedts; John J M Engelen; Edith Coonen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Meiotic outcomes of three-way translocations ascertained in cleavage-stage embryos: refinement of reproductive risks and implications for PGD.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven; Susan M Bint; Angela F Davies; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Clinical application of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  Wenke Zhang; Ying Liu; Li Wang; Hui Wang; Minyue Ma; Mengnan Xu; Xiaofei Xu; ZhiYing Gao; Jinliang Duan; David S Cram; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Chromosomal characteristics at cleavage and blastocyst stages from the same embryos.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Nan Zhao; Xiaozhu Wang; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Effects of a carrier's sex and age on the segregation patterns of the trivalent of Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Wenjie Jiang; Yueting Zhu; Hong Chen; Junhao Yan; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Complex chromosomal rearrangement-a lesson learned from PGS.

Authors:  Tsvia Frumkin; Sagit Peleg; Veronica Gold; Adi Reches; Shiri Asaf; Foad Azem; Dalit Ben-Yosef; Mira Malcov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Benefits and drawbacks of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations: lessons from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven; Frances A Flinter; Yakoub Khalaf; Alison Lashwood; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Chromosomal integrity of human preimplantation embryos at different days post fertilization.

Authors:  Michal Dekel-Naftali; Ayala Aviram-Goldring; Talia Litmanovitch; Jana Shamash; Hagith Yonath; Ariel Hourvitz; Yuval Yung; Masha Brengauz; Eyal Schiff; Shlomit Rienstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.