Literature DB >> 21488862

The 'overly-sensitive' heart: sodium channel block and QRS interval prolongation.

Gary A Gintant1, David J Gallacher, Michael K Pugsley.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Cardiac safety remains of paramount importance in the development of successful clinical drug candidates. Great progress has been made recently in understanding liabilities associated with delayed ventricular repolarization (manifest as QT prolongation) and in predicting (thus avoiding) drugs that delay repolarization based on application of strategic preclinical assays. Following the advances made in clinical electrophysiological monitoring and conduct of thorough QT studies, focus is now shifting towards monitoring of additional drug-induced effects, particularly on ventricular conduction (measured as changes in the QRS interval on the ECG) as part of evolving clinical thorough ECG studies. In this issue of the British Journal of Pharmacology, a study by Harmer et al. proposes provisional safety margins for QRS prolongation in man based on retrospective clinical data and a single in vitro approach to assess potency of block of cardiac sodium current (hNav1.5), the ionic current responsible for ventricular conduction (observed as QRS prolongation). The present commentary places their study in context with evolving preclinical cardiac electrophysiological safety assessments, along with discussions focused on ensuring the proper 'translation' of preclinical findings with potential clinical concerns. Given the extant limitations and uncertainties of presently available data, as well as our limited understanding of the pro-arrhythmic potential associated with these changes, due caution should be applied when considering the proposed in vitro-based margins for drug-induced QRS prolongation measured clinically. Additional validation with multiple preclinical models and more rigorous clinical safety studies will be necessary to substantiate these recommended margins. LINKED ARTICLE: This article is a commentary on Harmer et al., pp. 260-273 of this issue. To view this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01415.x.
© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21488862      PMCID: PMC3174406          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01433.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  30 in total

1.  International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on S7B Nonclinical Evaluation of the Potential for Delayed Ventricular Repolarization (QT Interval Prolongation) by Human Pharmaceuticals; availability. Notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2005-10-20

2.  Food and Drug Administration recommends against the continued use of propoxyphene.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother       Date:  2011

3.  On the relationship between block of the cardiac Na⁺ channel and drug-induced prolongation of the QRS complex.

Authors:  A R Harmer; J-P Valentin; C E Pollard
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Prognostic Significance of Quantitative QRS Duration.

Authors:  Aseem D Desai; Tan Swee Yaw; Takuya Yamazaki; Amir Kaykha; Sung Chun; Victor F Froelicher
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Clinical evaluation of the use-dependent QRS prolongation and the reverse use-dependent QT prolongation of class I and class III antiarrhythmic agents and their value in predicting efficacy.

Authors:  T Sadanaga; S Ogawa; Y Okada; N Tsutsumi; S Iwanaga; T Yoshikawa; M Akaishi; S Handa
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Predicting drug-induced slowing of conduction and pro-arrhythmia: identifying the 'bad' sodium current blockers.

Authors:  Hua Rong Lu; Jutta Rohrbacher; Eddy Vlaminckx; Karel Van Ammel; Gan-Xin Yan; David J Gallacher
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

Authors:  D S Echt; P R Liebson; L B Mitchell; R W Peters; D Obias-Manno; A H Barker; D Arensberg; A Baker; L Friedman; H L Greene
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Frequency-dependent effects of amitriptyline on ventricular conduction and cardiac rhythm in dogs.

Authors:  S Nattel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Temperature and voltage dependence of sodium channel blocking and unblocking by O-demethyl encainide in isolated guinea pig myocytes.

Authors:  J A Johns; T Anno; P B Bennett; D J Snyders; L M Hondeghem
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.105

10.  Re-evaluation of the action potential upstroke velocity as a measure of the Na+ current in cardiac myocytes at physiological conditions.

Authors:  Géza Berecki; Ronald Wilders; Berend de Jonge; Antoni C G van Ginneken; Arie O Verkerk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dynamic monitoring of beating periodicity of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes as a predictive tool for preclinical safety assessment.

Authors:  Yama A Abassi; Biao Xi; Nan Li; Wei Ouyang; Alexander Seiler; Manfred Watzele; Ralf Kettenhofen; Heribert Bohlen; Andreas Ehlich; Eugen Kolossov; Xiaobo Wang; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Cardiac ion channels.

Authors:  Birgit T Priest; Jeff S McDermott
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 3.  Reducing safety-related drug attrition: the use of in vitro pharmacological profiling.

Authors:  Joanne Bowes; Andrew J Brown; Jacques Hamon; Wolfgang Jarolimek; Arun Sridhar; Gareth Waldron; Steven Whitebread
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Inhibition of Late Sodium Current as an Innovative Antiarrhythmic Strategy.

Authors:  Philipp Bengel; Shakil Ahmad; Samuel Sossalla
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-06

5.  Predicting QRS and PR interval prolongations in humans using nonclinical data.

Authors:  L Bergenholm; J Parkinson; J Mettetal; N D Evans; M J Chappell; T Collins
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Cardiac Safety Implications of hNav1.5 Blockade and a Framework for Pre-Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Gül Erdemli; Albert M Kim; Haisong Ju; Clayton Springer; Robert C Penland; Peter K Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Early identification of hERG liability in drug discovery programs by automated patch clamp.

Authors:  Timm Danker; Clemens Möller
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Prediction of Thorough QT study results using action potential simulations based on ion channel screens.

Authors:  Gary R Mirams; Mark R Davies; Stephen J Brough; Matthew H Bridgland-Taylor; Yi Cui; David J Gavaghan; Najah Abi-Gerges
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Combinations of QTc-prolonging drugs: towards disentangling pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in their potentially additive nature.

Authors:  Andreas D Meid; Irene Bighelli; Sarah Mächler; Gerd Mikus; Giuseppe Carrà; Mariasole Castellazzi; Claudio Lucii; Giovanni Martinotti; Michela Nosè; Giovanni Ostuzzi; Corrado Barbui; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-08-28

10.  Di-4-ANEPPS Modulates Electrical Activity and Progress of Myocardial Ischemia in Rabbit Isolated Heart.

Authors:  Marina Ronzhina; Tibor Stracina; Lubica Lacinova; Katarina Ondacova; Michaela Pavlovicova; Lucie Marsanova; Radovan Smisek; Oto Janousek; Katerina Fialova; Jana Kolarova; Marie Novakova; Ivo Provaznik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.