Literature DB >> 21488247

Who’s in the driver's seat? The influence of patient and physician enthusiasm on regional variation in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery: a population-based study.

S Samuel Bederman1, Peter C Coyte, Hans J Kreder, Nizar N Mahomed, Warren J McIsaac, James G Wright.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study using administrative databases, census data, and surveys of orthopedic/neurosurgeons, family physicians (FPs) and patients in Ontario, Canada.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of the enthusiasm of patients, FPs, and surgeons for surgery on the regional variation in surgical rates for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine (DDLS), such as spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rates of surgery and healthcare costs for treating DDLS have been increasing. Regional variation in spinal surgical rates has been observed and it is thought that the enthusiasm of patients and physicians for surgery contributes to this variation.
METHODS: Using population-based administrative databases, we included all patients aged 50 years and older who underwent DDLS surgery (i.e., decompression/laminectomy, fusion) from 2002 to 2006 and calculated standardized utilization rates across counties. We measured regional "enthusiasm for surgery" for surgeons, FPs, and patients, using responses from a province-wide survey. Small-area variation analysis and multivariate Poisson regression models were performed calculating incidence rate ratios (IRRs) controlling for county demographics, socioeconomic measures, prevalence of disease, and community resources.
RESULTS: We identified 10,318 DDLS surgeries (mean age 65 years, 50.6% female). Significant regional variation was observed (extremal quotient 5.0, coefficient of variation 28.0). Counties with higher rates of surgery had higher surgeon enthusiasm for surgery (IRR: 1.26, P < 0.013), older (IRR: 2.17, P < 0.0001) male patients (IRR: 1.19, P < 0.0001), lower income (IRR: 0.89, P < 0.0015), more knowledge of official languages (IRR: 1.12, P < 0.0003), and the presence of magnetic resonance imaging scanners (IRR: 1.30, P < 0.004). FP and patient enthusiasm for surgery, physician supply, and prevalence of disease were not statistically associated with higher surgical rates.
CONCLUSION: Prior studies have not addressed the role of patient enthusiasm for surgery. Although patients and FPs had variable enthusiasm for surgery, surgeon enthusiasm was the dominant potentially modifiable factor influencing surgical rates. Prevalence of disease and community resources were not related to surgical rates. Strategies targeting surgeon practices may reduce regional variation in care and improve access disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21488247     DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181d25e6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

Review 1.  Drivers of surgery for the degenerative hip, knee, and spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Charles D Rosen; Nitin N Bhatia; P Douglas Kiester; Ranjan Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Factors influencing the surgical decision for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis in a preference-based shared decision-making process.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Jae-Young Park; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Is There Variation in Procedural Utilization for Lumbar Spine Disorders Between a Fee-for-Service and Salaried Healthcare System?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Factors Contributing To Geographic Variation In End-Of-Life Expenditures For Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Haiden A Huskamp; Elena Kouri; Deborah Schrag; Mark C Hornbrook; David A Haggstrom; Mary Beth Landrum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients: prospective study using cannulated cemented pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Angel R Piñera; Camen Duran; Belen Lopez; Isabel Saez; Emmanuel Correia; Luis Alvarez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Bradley N Reames; Peter McCulloch; Andrew J Carr; W Bruce Campbell; John E Wennberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Influence of Peer Physicians on Intensity of End-of-Life Care for Cancer Decedents.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Alistair James O'Malley; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Stacy W Gray; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Understanding the dissemination of sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; Rodney L Dunn; Samuel R Kaufman; John O L DeLancey; J Quentin Clemens; John T Stoffel; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Use of instrumented lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions: trends and costs over time in Ontario, Canada

Authors:  Yan Xu; David Yen; Marlo Whitehead; Jianfeng Xu; Ana P. Johnson
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  National Trends and Geographic Variation in Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Philip P Goodney; Alyssa M Flores; Joseph DeSimone; Anthony W DiScipio; Andrea Austin; Jock N McCullough
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.