Literature DB >> 21488062

Calculation of binding free energies of inhibitors to plasmepsin II.

Denise Steiner1, Chris Oostenbrink, François Diederich, Martina Zürcher, Wilfred F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

An understanding at the atomic level of the driving forces of inhibitor binding to the protein plasmepsin (PM) II would be of interest to the development of drugs against malaria. To this end, three state of the art computational techniques to compute relative free energies-thermodynamic integration (TI), Hamiltonian replica-exchange (H-RE) TI, and comparison of bound versus unbound ligand energy and entropy-were applied to a protein-ligand system of PM II and several exo-3-amino-7-azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptanes and the resulting relative free energies were compared with values derived from experimental IC(50) values. For this large and flexible protein-ligand system, the simulations could not properly sample the relevant parts of the conformational space of the bound ligand, resulting in failure to reproduce the experimental data. Yet, the use of Hamiltonian replica exchange in conjunction with thermodynamic integration resulted in enhanced convergence and computational efficiency compared to standard thermodynamic integration calculations. The more approximate method of calculating only energetic and entropic contributions of the ligand in its bound and unbound states from conventional molecular dynamics (MD) simulations reproduced the major trends in the experimental binding free energies, which could be rationalized in terms of energetic and entropic characteristics of the different structural and physico-chemical properties of the protein and ligands.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21488062     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  7 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Ligand Binding Thermodynamic Cycles: Hysteresis, the Locally Weighted Histogram Analysis Method, and the Overlapping States Matrix.

Authors:  Di Cui; Bin W Zhang; Zhiqiang Tan; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Improved Binding Free Energy Predictions from Single-Reference Thermodynamic Integration Augmented with Hamiltonian Replica Exchange.

Authors:  Ilja V Khavrutskii; Anders Wallqvist
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Evaluating thermodynamic integration performance of the new amber molecular dynamics package and assess potential halogen bonds of enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI) benzimidazole inhibitors.

Authors:  Pin-Chih Su; Michael E Johnson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Accelerated adaptive integration method.

Authors:  Joseph W Kaus; Mehrnoosh Arrar; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Free-energy calculations of residue mutations in a tripeptide using various methods to overcome inefficient sampling.

Authors:  Michael M H Graf; Manuela Maurer; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Rationalization of stereospecific binding of propranolol to cytochrome P450 2D6 by free energy calculations.

Authors:  Gabor Nagy; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 1.733

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.