Literature DB >> 21487916

Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.

Martin C Koch1, Boris Adamietz, Sebastian M Jud, Peter A Fasching, Lothar Haeberle, Stefan Karbacher, Klaus Veit, Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland, Michael Uder, Matthias W Beckmann, Mayada R Bani, Katharina Heusinger, Christian R Loehberg, Alexander Cavallaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast volume is a relevant measure for the prevention and prediction of diseases and for aesthetic surgery. This study evaluated a new technique to determine breast volume and compared measures using a three-dimensional (3D) body surface scanner and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, with the latter used as the standard method.
METHODS: Both MRI scans and body surface 3D scans were obtained from 22 women. For each method, breast volumes were assessed. The MRI calculations of the breast volumes were performed by a specially trained radiologist using analysis software. A textured 3D image was generated by a calibrated digital texture camera after breast surface data acquisition. The volume assessment of the 3D photography was calculated using a software package after manual outlining of the breast and automated projection of a dorsal limit. Linear regression was used to predict the MRI volume assessment with the 3D image volume assessment.
RESULTS: The mean breast volume according to MRI volumetry was 442.8 ml on the left side and 471.8 ml on the right side. The mean breast volume using a 3D body surface volume assessment method was 273.8 ml (observer A) and 226.2 ml (observer B) on the left side and 284.4 ml (observer A) and 234.9 ml (observer B) on the right side. The use of linear regression models showed R (2) values of 0.59-0.77. The mean time for MRI recording and volume assessment was 68.0 ± 14.1 min for both sides and 11.6 ± 1.5 min for 3D recording and volume assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3D surface-based volume measurements are feasible in terms of time and can predict the MRI breast volume with sufficient accuracy. This might facilitate the broad use of such an assessment technique in a large-scale epidemiologic study using breast volume as a study aim. Additionally, further development of volume assessments could help to implement this technique in breast surgery procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487916     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-011-9708-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gestation-Specific Changes in the Anatomy and Physiology of Healthy Pregnant Women: An Extended Repository of Model Parameters for Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pregnancy.

Authors:  André Dallmann; Ibrahim Ince; Michaela Meyer; Stefan Willmann; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen; Robert T Spychal; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

3.  Clinical Assessment of Breast Volume: Can 3D Imaging Be the Gold Standard?

Authors:  Renee C Killaars; Myriam L G Preuβ; Nathalie J P de Vos; Camille C J L Y van Berlo; Marc B I Lobbes; René R W J van der Hulst; Andrzej A Piatkowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-11-25

4.  Optical measurement of dimensional parameters of the breast with subjects in prone position.

Authors:  Ann-Christin Roessler; Felix Althoff; Florian Jaeger; Willi Kalender; Evelyn Wenkel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-07-31

Review 5.  Modern trends in lipomodeling.

Authors:  Ahmed Hassan El-Sabbagh
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2017-04-03

6.  The potential role of three-dimensional surface imaging as a tool to evaluate aesthetic outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT).

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Rosa Di Micco; Komel Khabra; Lisa Wolf; Nandita deSouza; Nicola Roche; Peter A Barry; Anna M Kirby; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Improved accuracy of breast volume calculation from 3D surface imaging data using statistical shape models.

Authors:  Michael W Göpper; Jakob Neubauer; Ziad Kalash; G Björn Stark; Filip Simunovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Avoiding a Systematic Error in Assessing Fat Graft Survival in the Breast with Repeated Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Peter V Glovinski; Mikkel Herly; Felix C Müller; Jens J Elberg; Stig-Frederik T Kølle; Anne Fischer-Nielsen; Carsten Thomsen; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-09-08

9.  RANKL and OPG and their influence on breast volume changes during pregnancy in healthy women.

Authors:  Marius Wunderle; Matthias Ruebner; Lothar Häberle; Eva Schwenke; Carolin C Hack; Christian M Bayer; Martin C Koch; Judith Schwitulla; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Ivona Kozieradzki; Michael P Lux; Matthias W Beckmann; Sebastian M Jud; Josef M Penninger; Michael O Schneider; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.