Literature DB >> 21487868

The Cross-technique for single-incision pediatric endosurgical pyloromyotomy.

Oliver J Muensterer1, Albert J Chong, Keith E Georgeson, Carroll M Harmon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision pediatric endosurgical (SIPES) pyloromyotomy is frequently used for the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at our center. Our initial SIPES approach mirrored the conventional, triangulated laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Because an increased number of perforations were noted on our initial analysis, a more straightforward Cross-technique SIPES pyloromyotomy was developed. This study compares the current Cross-technique SIPES pyloromyotomy to the previous standard SIPES operation.
METHODS: The Cross-technique entails grasping the antrum with the surgeon's left hand instrument, retracting toward the left lower quadrant, and thereby orienting the pylorus obliquely toward the right upper quadrant. The serosal incision and muscular spreading is accomplished using a right-hand instrument that crosses over the left hand grasper. Demographic variables, operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, conversion rate, and postoperative length of stay were compared.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine Cross-technique patients were compared with 23 in the standard group. The Cross-technique was faster than the standard procedure (21 ± 5 vs. 27 ± 12 min, p = 0.03) and EBL was lower (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.7 ± 0.6 ml, p = 0.02). There were two mucosal perforations requiring conversions to triangulated 3-access-site laparoscopy in the standard, and one conversion to open surgery in the Cross-technique group. Patients who underwent cross-technique pyloromyotomy weighed less (3.6 ± 0.6 vs. 4.0 ± 0.5 kg, p = 0.012), but there were no differences in age, gender ratio, conversion rate, or length of stay. There was one postoperative wound infection in the cross-technique, but none in the standard group. No patients required reoperation. All participating surgeons felt that the cross-technique was more ergonomic and easier to perform than the standard SIPES technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The Cross-technique appears superior to standard SIPES pyloromyotomy and should be preferentially used for single-incision endosurgical pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487868     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1677-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Jill Van Der Zee; Hock L Tan; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Smaller scars--what is the big deal: a survey of the perceived value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Ramanath N Haricharan; Charles J Aprahamian; Traci L Morgan; Carroll M Harmon; Keith E Georgeson; Douglas C Barnhart
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Open vs. laparoscopic pyloromyotomy--a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  R Lange; M Rey; E Domínguez Fernández
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.442

4.  The umbilical fold approach to pyloromyotomy: is it a safe alternative to the right upper-quadrant approach?

Authors:  M J Leinwand; D B Shaul; K D Anderson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The learning curve for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  W D Ford; J A Crameri; A J Holland
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Impact of surgical approach on outcome in 622 consecutive pyloromyotomies at a pediatric teaching institution.

Authors:  Lena Perger; Julie R Fuchs; Luka Komidar; David P Mooney
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Pyloromyotomy through an infra-umbilical incision: open technique and superb cosmesis.

Authors:  S Emil
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.191

9.  Experience with a nonlaparoscopic, transumbilical, intracavitary pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Michael W L Gauderer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marc-David Leclair; Valérie Plattner; Eric Mirallie; Corinne Lejus; Jean-Michel Nguyen; Guillaume Podevin; Yves Heloury
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Single-incision pediatric endosurgery in newborns and infants.

Authors:  Yury Kozlov; Vladimir Novozhilov; Polina Baradieva; Pavel Krasnov; Konstantin Kovalkov; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-08

2.  Centennial of pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  V Raveenthiran
Journal:  J Neonatal Surg       Date:  2013-01-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.