Literature DB >> 18206463

Smaller scars--what is the big deal: a survey of the perceived value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Ramanath N Haricharan1, Charles J Aprahamian, Traci L Morgan, Carroll M Harmon, Keith E Georgeson, Douglas C Barnhart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomies are equally safe and effective, with the principal benefit of laparoscopy being better cosmesis. The goal of this study was to measure the perceived value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.
METHODS: Four hundred sixteen subjects (177 college freshmen, 126 first-year medical students, and 101 parents) were asked to complete a questionnaire after photographs of mature pyloromyotomy (open and laparoscopic) scars were shown to them. To measure the perceived value, subjects' willingness to pay hypothetical additional out-of-pocket expenses for their preferred operation was assessed. Data were analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, t test and multivariable regression.
RESULTS: Four hundred four surveys were complete. Overall, 74% preferred the appearance after laparoscopy. Eighty-eight percent would pay an additional out-of-pocket amount for their daughter and 85% for their son to have the cosmetic outcome after laparoscopy. Respondents were willing to pay more for their daughters (P < .0001) and sons (P < .0001) than themselves. As expected, income level (P < .0001) influenced the willingness to pay, whereas ethnicity, education, number of children, and sex did not.
CONCLUSIONS: The cosmetic benefit of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy was valued by a wide demographic with 85% being willing to pay additional expenses for their children to have smaller scars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18206463     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  8 in total

1.  Single-incision pediatric Endosurgical (SIPES) versus conventional laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Assessment of the length of myotomy in peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) using a submucosal tunnel technique (video).

Authors:  Yunho Jung; Jongchan Lee; Mark A Gromski; Masayuki Kato; Sam Rodriguez; Ram Chuttani; Kai Matthes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Cross-technique for single-incision pediatric endosurgical pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Oliver J Muensterer; Albert J Chong; Keith E Georgeson; Carroll M Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of a novel technique of the microlaparoscopic pyloromyotomy to circumbilical and Weber-Ramstedt approaches.

Authors:  Salmai Turial; Jan Enders; Felix Schier; Mariana Santos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Microlaparoscopic pyloromyotomy in children: initial experiences with a new technique.

Authors:  Salmai Turial; Jan Enders; Felix Schier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: initial experience.

Authors:  Oliver J Muensterer; Obinna O Adibe; Carrol M Harmon; Albert Chong; Erik N Hansen; Donna Bartle; Keith E Georgeson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Pediatric laparoscopy: Facts and factitious claims.

Authors:  V Raveenthiran
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-10

8.  An Analysis of Pediatric Scar Progression Over Time.

Authors:  Blaire Slavin; Roberta Torres; Anne C Fischer
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2018-04-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.