RATIONALE: Fluoxetine (Prozac®) is the most frequently prescribed drug to battle depression in pregnant women, but its safety in the unborn child has not yet been established. Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, crosses the placenta, leading to increased extracellular serotonin levels and potentially neurodevelopmental changes in the fetus. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the long-term consequences of prenatal fluoxetine in rats. METHODS: Pregnant rats were injected daily with 12 mg/kg fluoxetine or vehicle from gestational day 11 until birth, and the behavior of the offspring was monitored. RESULTS: Plasma fluoxetine transfer from mother to pup was 83%, and high levels of fluoxetine (13.0 μg/g) were detected in the pup brain 5 h after the last injection. Fluoxetine-treated dams gave birth to litters 15% smaller than usual and to pups of reduced weight (until postnatal day 7). Furthermore, prenatal fluoxetine exposure significantly increased anxiety in the novelty-suppressed feeding test, the footshock-induced conditioned place aversion test, and the elevated plus maze test (following footshock pre-exposure) during adulthood, and also significantly decreased components of social play behavior at 4 weeks of age, and a strong tendency for increased self-grooming and making less contact in adults. Behavioral despair, anhedonia, and sexual behavior were not different between treatment groups. Finally, the hypothermic response to the 5-HT(1A) agonist flesinoxan was observed at a lower dose in prenatally fluoxetine-exposed rats than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal fluoxetine exposure in rats leads to detrimental behavioral outcomes in later life, which may partly be due to altered 5-HT(1A) receptor signaling.
RATIONALE: Fluoxetine (Prozac®) is the most frequently prescribed drug to battle depression in pregnant women, but its safety in the unborn child has not yet been established. Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, crosses the placenta, leading to increased extracellular serotonin levels and potentially neurodevelopmental changes in the fetus. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the long-term consequences of prenatal fluoxetine in rats. METHODS: Pregnant rats were injected daily with 12 mg/kg fluoxetine or vehicle from gestational day 11 until birth, and the behavior of the offspring was monitored. RESULTS: Plasma fluoxetine transfer from mother to pup was 83%, and high levels of fluoxetine (13.0 μg/g) were detected in the pup brain 5 h after the last injection. Fluoxetine-treated dams gave birth to litters 15% smaller than usual and to pups of reduced weight (until postnatal day 7). Furthermore, prenatal fluoxetine exposure significantly increased anxiety in the novelty-suppressed feeding test, the footshock-induced conditioned place aversion test, and the elevated plus maze test (following footshock pre-exposure) during adulthood, and also significantly decreased components of social play behavior at 4 weeks of age, and a strong tendency for increased self-grooming and making less contact in adults. Behavioral despair, anhedonia, and sexual behavior were not different between treatment groups. Finally, the hypothermic response to the 5-HT(1A) agonist flesinoxan was observed at a lower dose in prenatally fluoxetine-exposed rats than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal fluoxetine exposure in rats leads to detrimental behavioral outcomes in later life, which may partly be due to altered 5-HT(1A) receptor signaling.
Authors: D Michelson; J D Amsterdam; F M Quitkin; F W Reimherr; J F Rosenbaum; J Zajecka; K L Sundell; Y Kim; C M Beasley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Dorota Maciag; Kimberly L Simpson; David Coppinger; Yuefeng Lu; Yue Wang; Rick C S Lin; Ian A Paul Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jocelien D A Olivier; Alexander R Cools; Peter M T Deen; Berend Olivier; Bart A Ellenbroek Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: J D A Olivier; M G C Van Der Hart; R P L Van Swelm; P J Dederen; J R Homberg; T Cremers; P M T Deen; E Cuppen; A R Cools; B A Ellenbroek Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Charlotte Duverneuil; Geoffroy Lorin de la Grandmaison; Philippe de Mazancourt; Jean-Claude Alvarez Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Cornelle W Noorlander; Frederique F T Ververs; Peter G J Nikkels; Cees J A van Echteld; Gerard H A Visser; Marten P Smidt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Veronika Kiryanova; Victoria M Smith; Richard H Dyck; Michael C Antle Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Susan E Maloney; Shyam Akula; Michael A Rieger; Katherine B McCullough; Krystal Chandler; Adrian M Corbett; Audrey E McGowin; Joseph D Dougherty Journal: eNeuro Date: 2018-07-09
Authors: Claudia Lugo-Candelas; Jiook Cha; Susie Hong; Vanessa Bastidas; Myrna Weissman; William P Fifer; Michael Myers; Ardesheer Talati; Ravi Bansal; Bradley S Peterson; Catherine Monk; Jay A Gingrich; Jonathan Posner Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 16.193