Literature DB >> 16401777

Sustained reverse left ventricular structural remodeling with cardiac resynchronization at one year is a function of etiology: quantitative Doppler echocardiographic evidence from the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE).

Martin G St John Sutton1, Ted Plappert, Kathryn E Hilpisch, William T Abraham, David L Hayes, Edward Chinchoy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective therapy for patients with moderate to severe heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and symptomatic benefit from CRT were sustained at 12 months, and if so, in what proportion of patients this occurred. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Serial Doppler echocardiograms were obtained at baseline and 6 and 12 months after CRT in 228 patients enrolled in the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) trial. Measurements were made of LV end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes, ejection fraction, LV mass, severity of mitral regurgitation (MR), peak transmitral velocities during early (E wave) and late (A wave) diastolic filling, and myocardial performance index. At both 6 and 12 months, respectively, CRT was associated with reduced LV EDV (P<0.0001 and P=0.007) and LV ESV (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001), improved ejection fraction (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001), regression of LV mass (P=0.012 and P<0.0001), and reduced MR (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001). LV filling time, transmitral E/A ratio, and myocardial performance index all improved at 12 months compared with baseline (P<0.001, P=0.031, and P<0.0001). Reverse LV remodeling with CRT occurred in more patients at 6 than at 12 months (74% versus 60%, respectively; P<0.05) and was greater in patients with a nonischemic than an ischemic etiology.
CONCLUSIONS: Reverse LV remodeling and symptom benefit with CRT are sustained at 12 months in patients with New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure but occur to a lesser degree in patients with an ischemic versus a nonischemic etiology, most likely owing to the inexorable progression of ischemic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16401777     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.520817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  70 in total

1.  Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David Birnie; Rob A de Kemp; Anthony S Tang; Terence D Ruddy; Michael H Gollob; Ann Guo; Kathryn Williams; Kerry Thomson; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Cardiac dyssynchrony: we have the tools. It is time to use them.

Authors:  Steven Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Bas L van der Hoeven; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Reverse remodelling in heart failure with cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  M St John Sutton; M G Keane
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Therapeutic decision-making for patients with fluctuating mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Khalil Fattouch; Giovanni La Canna
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Impact of scar burden by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Evan C Adelstein; Hidekazu Tanaka; Prem Soman; Glen Miske; Stephanie C Haberman; Samir F Saba; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Optimal use of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Gabe B Bleeker; Cheuk-Man Yu; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Johan de Sutter; Nico Van de Veire; Eduard R Holman; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Approach to patients with heart failure and pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Paul R Forfia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-08

10.  Lack of clinical predictors of optimal V-V delay in patients with cardiac resynchronization devices.

Authors:  Avi Fischer; Riple Hansalia; Samantha Buckley; Robin Goldberg; Martin Goldman; Paul Muntner; Davendra Mehta; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.