BACKGROUND: Anopheles culicifacies, the main vector of human malaria in rural India, is a complex of five sibling species. Despite being phylogenetically related, a naturally selected subgroup species B of this sibling species complex is found to be a poor vector of malaria. We have attempted to understand the differences between vector and non-vector Anopheles culicifacies mosquitoes in terms of transcriptionally activated nitric oxide synthase (AcNOS) physiologies to elucidate the mechanism of refractoriness. Identification of the differences between genes and gene products that may impart refractory phenotype can facilitate development of novel malaria transmission blocking strategies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a study on phylogenetically related susceptible (species A) and refractory (species B) sibling species of An. culicifacies mosquitoes to characterize biochemical and molecular differences in AcNOS gene and gene elements and their ability to inhibit oocyst growth. We demonstrate that in species B, AcNOS specific activity and nitrite/nitrates in mid-guts and haemolymph were higher as compared to species A after invasion of the mid-gut by P. vivax at the beginning and during the course of blood feeding. Semiquantitative RT-PCR and real time PCR data of AcNOS concluded that this gene is more abundantly expressed in midgut of species B than in species A and is transcriptionally upregulated post blood meals. Dietary feeding of L-NAME along with blood meals significantly inhibited midgut AcNOS activity leading to an increase in oocyst production in An. culicifacies species B. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We hypothesize that upregulation of mosquito innate cytotoxicity due to NOS in refractory strain to Plasmodium vivax infection may contribute to natural refractoriness in An. culicifacies mosquito population. This innate capacity of refractory mosquitoes could represent the ancestral function of the mosquito immune system against the parasite and could be utilized to understand the molecular basis of refractoriness in planning effective vector control strategies.
BACKGROUND:Anopheles culicifacies, the main vector of humanmalaria in rural India, is a complex of five sibling species. Despite being phylogenetically related, a naturally selected subgroup species B of this sibling species complex is found to be a poor vector of malaria. We have attempted to understand the differences between vector and non-vector Anopheles culicifacies mosquitoes in terms of transcriptionally activated nitric oxide synthase (AcNOS) physiologies to elucidate the mechanism of refractoriness. Identification of the differences between genes and gene products that may impart refractory phenotype can facilitate development of novel malaria transmission blocking strategies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a study on phylogenetically related susceptible (species A) and refractory (species B) sibling species of An. culicifacies mosquitoes to characterize biochemical and molecular differences in AcNOS gene and gene elements and their ability to inhibit oocyst growth. We demonstrate that in species B, AcNOS specific activity and nitrite/nitrates in mid-guts and haemolymph were higher as compared to species A after invasion of the mid-gut by P. vivax at the beginning and during the course of blood feeding. Semiquantitative RT-PCR and real time PCR data of AcNOS concluded that this gene is more abundantly expressed in midgut of species B than in species A and is transcriptionally upregulated post blood meals. Dietary feeding of L-NAME along with blood meals significantly inhibited midgut AcNOS activity leading to an increase in oocyst production in An. culicifacies species B. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We hypothesize that upregulation of mosquito innate cytotoxicity due to NOS in refractory strain to Plasmodium vivaxinfection may contribute to natural refractoriness in An. culicifacies mosquito population. This innate capacity of refractory mosquitoes could represent the ancestral function of the mosquito immune system against the parasite and could be utilized to understand the molecular basis of refractoriness in planning effective vector control strategies.
The mosquito Anopheles culicifacies Giles 1901 is the most important
vector of malaria in India and is responsible for nearly 65 percent of total
2–3 million malaria cases reported annually [1]. The An.
culicifacies species complex comprises of five sibling species
provisionally designated as species A, B, C, D and E [2]. Sibling species are
phylogenetically closely related to each other, are morphologically
indistinguishable, and can crossbreed in captivity. Distinct biological variations
are reported to exist among different members of the An.
culicifacies sibling species complex with respect to variation in
disease-transmission potential and variation in susceptibility to
Plasmodium
[2], [3], [4]: some are
refractory and block transmission of parasite [5], [6]. Thus naturally evolved and
genetically selected refractory strains are important for the study of mechanisms
that mediate Plasmodium killing [7], [8], [9].The whole genome analysis and application of genetic and molecular biological
techniques to research on mosquitoes has broadened the scope for the development of
disease control strategies [10], [11]. Advances in the molecular genetic manipulations of
insect species have led to speculation that malaria could be controlled through
genetic alterations of Anopheline mosquitoes rendered refractory to
Plasmodium growth and differentiation can be used for
development of novel control strategies [12], [13], [14], [15]. Among limited studies
carried out so far on malaria refractory mosquito, most are restricted to animal
parasite models. A specific strain of An. gambiae originally
selected to be refractory to P. cynomolgi was found to have limited
refractoriness to humanmalaria parasite P. falciparum
[7]. Furthermore,
a strain of An. stephensi selected for refractoriness to P.
falciparum transmission showed no detectable resistance to other
Plasmodium species [16]. However, none of these
strains were found to be completely refractory to any of the humanPlasmodium. While assessing natural susceptibility of
An. culicifacies sensu lato from different geographical areas
against P. vivaxinfection, Adak et
al
[17] reported the
isolation of a naturally occurring field strain of An. culicifacies
that is 100% refractory to P. vivax and partially resistant
to P. falciparum and P. vinckei (rodent parasite)
[6], [17]. This iso-female
line has been identified as An. culicifacies species B and may
serve as a model for the study of biochemical and molecular novel innate immune
responsive strategies for mechanisms of malaria refractoriness.To date the molecular basis of refractoriness and more generally parasite recognition
and killing are not well understood. Plasmodium undergoes a complex
sporogonic development in the midgut and salivary glands of the mosquito. During
their passage through a mosquito vector, malaria parasites undergo several
developmental transformations including that from a motile zygote, the ookinete, to
a sessile oocyst that develops beneath the basal lamina of the midgut epithelium.
This developmental cycle can be blocked by the innate cellular immune responses of
the mosquito thereby resulting in the elimination of parasite in the mosquito. It
has long been recognized that mosquitoes possess highly effective innate defense
mechanisms of both cellular and humoral nature [18], [19], [20], [21]. Recent studies have
documented a variety of additional immune responses, both cellular and humoral, and
secretion and activation of antimicrobial peptides, proteins and enzymes [22] as
manifested by transcriptional activation of the infection-responsive genes [15] but no
specific cyto-toxic mechanism has been described for any mosquito strains. In some
of the naturally selected mosquito refractory strains these responses may result in
the complete blockage of parasite development. Recent studies have suggested the
mosquito refractoriness to be manifested in sequential steps namely parasite
recognition and parasite killing followed by melanization for disposal of dead
parasites [23].
It has been shown that interference with physiological responses may affect the
immune activity readout e.g PPO activating enzymes, but how these responses are
coordinated and regulated is not yet known. Therefore, the drive to identify novel
control strategies has focused on identifying the genes and gene products that may
impart refractory phenotype manifested by immune responses for killing of parasites
at developmental stages in the mosquito [20], [24].Nitric oxide (NO), a multifunctional free radical and non specific cytotoxic
antiparasitic molecule [25], [26] has been strongly suggested as an important component of
innate immunity in midgut lumen. NO is also produced from the midgut epithelial
cells via the oxidative deamination of L-arginine to L-citrulline which is catalyzed
by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) [27]. It was shown [28] that a NOS gene in
An. stephensi is transcriptionally activated at a modest level
after malaria infection to limit the development of parasites; the early induction
partly occurs in the mid-gut, but the origin of late induction has not been
characterized. Induction of AsNOS expression is proportional to the
intensity of parasite infection and is detectable in the mid-gut by 6 h post
infection [29], [30], [31]. Early induction
is critical to inhibition of parasite development: dietary provision of the NOS
inhibitor N_-nitro-L-arginine, with a half life in blood of 3 to 6 h [29], resulted in
significantly higher parasite infection intensities than did the inactive enantiomer
N_-nitro-D-arginine [28]. Furthermore, basal level of NOS is required for the
survival of early stage Plasmodium, but elevated level of NOS
during later stage of oocyst development acts as major oocyst limiting factor [25]. The NO-mediated
defense of An. stephensi
[26] is
analogous to mammalian NO-mediated inactivation of liver-invading sporozoites and
blood-stage gametocytes [32] indicating that mosquitoes and mammals share a conserved
anti-parasite defense. Interestingly, though recently other immune molecules like
TEP1, APL family member proteins have been implicated for refractory mechanism [33], [34] the dynamic role
of NOS in parasite killing has not been explored to examine the mechanism of
refractoriness.In the present study, we investigate the plausible mechanism of refractoriness to
P. vivax in the malaria non vector mosquito species of
An. culicifacies species B through NOS physiologies. Our goal
is to understand and develop alternate tools for altering the vector competence of
An. culicifacies which requires the understanding the mechanism
of vectorial resistance to the malaria parasite including biochemical and molecular
studies of vector parasite interactions. Interruption of transmission cycle in the
mosquito by key toxic molecules namely nitrates and nitrites that are required for
successful killing of the parasite in the vector would require detailed knowledge of
the complex interplay between Plasmodium and its mosquito vector.
Our research provides the first description of the NO responses of An.
culicifacies against the humanmalaria parasite P.
vivax during its interaction with the mosquito midgut and predicts the
existence of Plasmodium-specific NOS mechanisms of gene induction
in An. culicifacies refractory species B. We show that
refractoriness may be due to cytotoxic killing of parasitic stages in the mosquito
midgut lumen. Our data suggest that mosquito innate immune system may affect
refractoriness via upregulation of AcNOS pathway and NO may
contribute to killing of parasite stages. Our results demonstrated that
AcNOS may be another effector gene in addition to
prophenoloxidase pathways to block the development of the malaria parasite in
An. culicifacies mosquito's midgut lumen and thus may
elucidate a novel putative mechanism of refractoriness.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
The study was carried out on susceptible (Species A) and refractory (Species B)
An. culicifacies sibling species to evaluate a plausible
role of NOS gene and gene elements in biochemical and molecular terms. This
study was performed in three sequential steps namely biochemical (NOS specific
activity, Nitrite and Nitrate assay), oocyst kinetics (oocyst growth) and
molecular (PCR, semiquantitative RT-PCR, real time PCR) at different periods of
infected blood feeding.The study was conducted under the protocol reviewed and approved by the
institutional Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) of National Institute of
Malaria Research (NIMR). Written informed consent was obtained from all the
volunteers prior to the collection of P. vivax positive blood
samples collected for mosquito feeding.
Establishment of refractory strain
The iso-female line that was identified as sibling species B and designated as
P. vivax refractory strain was established as described by
Adak et al
[17]. Briefly,
Indoor resting wild An. culicifacies sensu lato adult females
were collected from human dwellings by hand catch method and transported to
laboratory. Few adult female mosquitoes from each F1 iso-female
progeny were identified to sibling species using species-specific diagnostic
inversion genotypes as described [35]. At least 50 to 60
iso-female lines of species B from a particular geographical locality were
pooled together to establish a strain. Further, progenies of a single iso-female
line originated from Haldwani, Uttaranchal state, 29o 23′ N,
79o 30′ E was found to be 100% refractory against
P. vivaxinfection were selected.
Mosquito rearing
Cyclic colonies of Species A (S) and Species B (R) strains of malaria vector,
Anopheles culicifacies, were reared and propagated in an
insectary at National Institute of Malaria Research, Delhi as described by Adak
et al
[5]. Female
mosquitoes were offered rabbit blood for ovarian development. Following
hatching, larvae were reared in enamel trays containing de-chlorinated water and
fed on powdered dog biscuits and brewer's yeast tablets in 3∶2
ratios.
Blood feeding strategy
About 1–2 ml of P. vivax infected blood was drawn from
consenting volunteer patient (aged ≥16 yrs) having mature P.
vivax gametocytes density ranging between 0.05 to 0.5%
following human use protocol approved by the Human Ethical Committee of the
Centre as described by Adak et al [5]. Thin blood smears prepared from Plasmodium
vivax positive blood were fixed in methanol and stained in JSB
stain. The slides were examined under oil immersion lens of compound microscope
(Carl-Zeiss, Germany) for the presence of various stages of parasite.Three to four day old mosquitoes were starved by depriving them of raisin and
glucose pads for 12–16 hours. Approximately 100–200 starved
mosquitoes of both species A and species B were held in cages separately and
divided into three groups namely: sugar fed (SF), uninfected blood fed (UBF) and
P. vivaxinfected blood Fed (IBF). SF mosquitoes were
maintained (glucose pad) under appropriate conditions and were treated as
controls. For batch of UBF and IBF mosquitoes uninfected blood and gametocyte
positive P. vivax infected blood was placed in the cage for 2
hour for feeding the female adult mosquitoes via a membrane feeding apparatus
essentially following the method as described by Adak et al.,
[5]. After 2
hour of feeding, infected blood was removed from the cage. After 30 min. unfed
and partially fed mosquitoes were removed from each cohort and only fully
engorged mosquitoes were kept upto 14 days securely in 30×30×30 cms
cloth cages for dissection of mosquito midguts for subsequent examination of
sporogonic development. Mosquitoes were maintained on glucose water soaked
sterile cotton balls and changed daily, until dissection.
Midgut and haemolymph preparation
Minimum of 50% of the surviving An. culicifacies
mosquitoes from each feeding experiment were dissected on ice in PBS
(phosphate-buffered saline). Midgut tissue samples and haemolymph samples were
simultaneously isolated from individually dissected mosquitoes and were pooled
(25 samples) from sugar fed (SF, 0 day) and UBF and IBF mosquitoes (1, 3, 7,
9–10, and 14–15 days). Midguts were opened by a longitudinal
incision and haemolymph was directly collected and pooled. Midgut tissues were
thoroughly rinsed three times in ice-cold PBS to remove all traces of
peritrophic matrix and gut contents. Pooled haemolymph and dissected mid-guts
tissues were sonicated on ice (three pulses for 20 sec). After sonication
homogenized tissue was centrifuged at 1500 xg for 10 min to remove cell debris.
Supernatant was collected and stored at −70°C for further analysis.
Protein estimation was carried out by Lowry's method [36].
Biochemical Studies
Inhibition on AcNOS activity
Specific activities of AcNOS in midgut lysates of SF (0 days), UBF, IBF
mosquitoes in two replicates were measured as a rate of conversion of Arg to
Cit at 1, 3, 7 and 9–14 days pBM using nitric oxide colorimetric assay
(Roche). The concentration of midgut samples were calculated
from the standard curve and have been then compared by determining
µmoles/μg protein/unit time.For AcNOS inhibition experiments and to diminish the possible effects of
mid-gut microflora on NOS expression and NO generation, mosquitoes were
provided with 10% sugar solution and gentamicin-soaked (50
µg/ml in water) sterile cotton for two days before blood feeding. The
NOS inhibitor, L-NAME (1 mg/ml) was added to the blood in one feeder, D-NAME
(1 mg/ml) the inactive isomer, to the second feeder and P.
vivax infected blood alone was added to the third feeder, as a
control. Fully engorged mosquitoes were separated and transferred to cages
supplied with 10% glucose solution and maintained. Midguts from 25
mosquitoes per group were dissected at different time points (1, 3, 7, and
9–14 days). Specific activities of AcNOS in midgut of infected blood
fed mosquitoes with and without treatments in two replicates were
measured.
Determination of nitrite/nitrate levels
Production of NO was assessed by measuring the accumulation of nitrite/nitrate
(NO2
-/NO3
-) in the dissected
haemolymph and mid-gut from sugar fed (0 days), uninfected blood fed (UBF) and
P. vivaxinfected blood fed mosquitoes (IBF) of sensitive
(Sp. A) and refractory (Sp. B) species at 1, 3, 7, 9–10 and 14–15
days pBM by using a modified HPLC microassay method developed in our laboratory
[37].
Statistical differences among mean absorbance of two replicates in uninfected
and infected species at different days were analyzed using 2 ways ANOVA
(p<0.05).
Oocyst kinetics studies
Effects of NO on ookinetes viability: oocysts counts and dynamics
Two replicates of three groups of mosquitoes were provided with sugar cubes
and gentamicin (50 µg/ml) in water for three days before blood
feeding. On day 0, L-NAME and D-NAME was added to the infected blood before
mosquito feeding through a membrane feeding device; a third aliquot was left
as an untreated control. Minimum of 50% of the surviving An.
culicifacies mosquitoes from each feeding experiment, fed on
the same blood isolate were dissected on day ‘9’ and
‘10’ in normal saline (0.65% NaCl) and stained in a drop
of 0.5% mercurochrome [38]. Subsequently, midguts were dissected and
individual midguts were removed amd placed under a small piece of cover
glass and examined for the presence of infection in the midgut under an x 10
interference phase contrast objective of Axiophot Zeiss microscope.
Morphology was examined for P. vivax live oocysts and
number of oocysts was counted.
Statistical analysis
Differential infection among these two strains was assessed using two outcome
measures by comparing two indicators; the percent gut positivity for oocysts
/encapsulated parasites (oocyst rate) and geometric mean (GM) number of
oocysts/encapsulated parasites per gut (oocyst density) among all the
infected mosquitoes as described earlier [17]. The oocyst prevalence
was analyzed with the Chi-square Fishers exact test with Yates correction,
and the oocyst density with the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA. Data of
average number of oocysts were analyzed by Tukey's test (a>0.05 for
L-NAME v D-NAME experiments).
Molecular Studies
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR analysis of Anopheles
culicifacies
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from the midgut tissue of sensitive (Sp. A)
and refractory (Sp.B) strains of mosquito by the method as described [39]. PCR
assay was carried out to differentiate the sequence variations between
susceptible and refractory sibling species of An.
culicifacies. In order to test the homology of nitric oxide
synthase (NOS) enzyme in various strains of An.
culicifacies against An. stephensi, only those
sequences were selected using BLAST, which encoded co-factors of (NOS)
enzyme. We have designed primer complementary to An.
stephensi exon 1 region (200 bp) encoding co-factor heme
DOMAIN. Primers specific for those sequences were designed manually and the
quality of the oligos was checked using web based software Primer 3.
(http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi).
Primer sequences of forward and backward region were 5′ ATGAGGACCAACTATCGGG 3′ and
5′ GCCTTGGTGACAATGCTC 3′ respectively. Selected PCR
products (200 bp) amplified from genomic DNA in mosquito pools were cloned
into the pUC18 at HINDIII sites and sequenced and a comparative analysis of
the nucleotide sequence from both strains to others reported NOS was done
using the ClustalW BLAST homology analysis. (MacVector Version 7.0).
Dissections and RNA extractions
The mosquitoes were dissected in a drop of ice-cold sterile DEPC-treated
water and midgut from 25–30 mosquitoes was pooled in 100 µl DEPC
treated PBS buffer at −70°C. The tissues were ground to
homogeneity with a batterydriven hand-held homogenizer using DEPC-treated
sterile grinder tips and processed for RNA extraction. Total RNA was
isolated from dissected 25–30 midguts of each sugarfed (SF),
uninfected blood fed (UBF) and P. vivaxinfected blood fed
(IBF) mosquitoes at 0, 1, 3, 7 and 9–14 days pBM using RNeasy micro
kit (Qiagen).
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis
The relative transcript abundance and expression of NOS in naive mosquitoes
(An. culicifacies species A and species B) was
evaluated by semiquantitative RT-PCR both in uninfected (UBF) and P.
vivax infected blood fed (IBF) mosquitoes using primers
designed against An. stephensi at various intervals of
feeding as described previously. First strand cDNA was synthesized by using
oligo (dT) primer and transcriptor Reverse transcriptase (Roche) according
to manufacturer protocol. AcNOS fragment was amplified by
35 cycles of PCR (94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min and 72°C for
1.00 min) with the forward and backward primers (same as used in PCR).
Transcript abundance of RNA in the midgut tissues of An.
culicifacies species A and B were normalized to the ribosome S7
protein gene fragment and only 25 cycles were used for PCR amplification in
identical environment to obtain a 200 bp amplicon. After amplification 10
µl PCR products was analyzed by 1.8% agarose gel
electrophoresis. The gel image was photographed by video gel documentation
system (Bio-Rad). The semiquantitative RT-PCR images were evaluated and
pixels in respective bands were quantified using IPLab gel software for a 12
bit image. The results were expressed as a ratio calculated from the
integrated signal of AcNOS amplicon bands over ribosomal
protein S7 gene amplicon bands. For the mid-gut expression analysis, data
from three replicates were analysed by 2 way ANOVA.
Real Time RT-PCR analysis
Real time RT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Roche
Diagnostics, USA) and Light Cycler 480 system (Roche Diagnostics, USA) to
measure relative transcript levels of AcNOS in An.
culicifacies sp A and An. culicifaciessp B
mosquitoes. cDNA of both the species was reverse-transcribed from 500 ng
total RNA using oligo(dT) primer and transcriptor Reverse transcriptase
(Roche), following the manufacturer's instructions. Assays used a total
reaction volume of 20 µL incorporating 9 µl master mix with SYBR
green I and 10 µM of each primer and 2 µl cDNA. Signals were
normalized to the ribosome S7 protein gene fragment. The same conditions
have been taken for normalizer gene S7 RNA polymerase having forward primer
sequence 5' GGTGTTCGGTTCCAAGGTGA 3' and reverse primer
sequence 5' GGTGGTCTGCTGGTTCTTATCC 3'. The forward and
backward sequences of AcNOS primers for PCR are 5'
ATGAGGACCAACTATCGGG
3' and 5' GCCTTGGTGACAATGCTC 3' and PCR conditions were:
Initial denaturation and renaturation step were same for all primers,
i.e., 95°C for 5 min and 95°C for 30 sec,
50°C for 40 sec, 72°C for 30 sec of 40 cycles respectively. The
fluorescence acquisition temperature was 72°C for all genes. This assay
was performed thrice to minimize variations due to sample handling.
Amplification specificity was further validated by melting curve analysis,
generated at the end of each PCR reaction. A non-template control (NTC) was
run with every assay. Normalized data were used to quantitate relative
levels of a RNA in species A and species B. The threshold cycles
(Ct) were recorded for AcNOS and S-7
amplicons during each experiment. Difference between the Ct of
S-7 and AcNOS or ΔCt was determined and the
relative abundance of AcNOS was calculated in different
treatments using Comparative Ct method using the formula
2-ΔΔCt
[40].
Results
Effect of P. vivax infection on AcNOS activity
In our endeavor to investigate the role of nitric oxide mediated killing of the
P. vivax parasite in the An. culicifacies
species B, we measured the specific activities of the nitric oxide synthase
enzyme in both the sensitive (An. culicifacies species A) and
refractory mosquitoes (An. culicifacies species B). We assessed
the activities of AcNOS post blood meal at 1, 3, 7, 9–14 days in
mosquitoes by feeding uninfected blood (Figure 1A). 0 day old sugar fed mosquito
midguts were taken as a control. In these experiments, the enhanced activity of
AcNOS even at day 0 in refractory species suggested that NO physiology may play
a role in refractoriness. Data from blood feeding experiments showed that the
AcNOS specific activity of the enzyme is increased with the day's pBM in
both species A and species B. However, the increase was much more in species B
as compared to species A. Compared to midgut AcNOS activitiy in An.
culicifacies species A (34.8 µmoles/µgprotein/min,
p<0.001), refractory species An. culicifacies species B
exhibited a far more increase (60 µmoles/µgprotein/min, p<0.001)
at 9–14 days pBM (Figure
1A). Thus, these data suggested that nitric oxide mechanism could
contribute to the refractory phenotype of the An. culicifacies
species B mosquitoes.
Figure 1
Specific activity in P. vivax uninfected
and infected blood fed mosquitoes (with and without
inhibitor).
(A) Anopheles culicifacies nitric oxide synthase (AcNOS)
specific activity in sugar fed (0 days) and uninfected blood fed
mosquitoes midgut samples at different time points: 1, 3, 7, 9–14
days pBM in species A and species B. (B) An.
culicifacies nitric oxide synthase (AcNOS) specific
activity in P. vivax infected blood fed mosquitoes
midgut samples at different time points: 1, 3, 7, 9–14 days pBM in
species A and species B with and without L-NAME. L-NAME: N-nitro-L-
arginine methyl ester, pBM:post blood meal.
Specific activity in P. vivax uninfected
and infected blood fed mosquitoes (with and without
inhibitor).
(A) Anopheles culicifaciesnitric oxide synthase (AcNOS)
specific activity in sugar fed (0 days) and uninfected blood fed
mosquitoes midgut samples at different time points: 1, 3, 7, 9–14
days pBM in species A and species B. (B) An.
culicifacies nitric oxide synthase (AcNOS) specific
activity in P. vivaxinfected blood fed mosquitoes
midgut samples at different time points: 1, 3, 7, 9–14 days pBM in
species A and species B with and without L-NAME. L-NAME: N-nitro-L-
arginine methyl ester, pBM:post blood meal.To assess the ability of P. vivax parasite to induce the AcNOS
activity, we have also measured and compared the specific activities of the
AcNOS in both the sensitive species A and refractory species B by feeding
P. vivax infected blood meal at 1, 3, 7, 9–14 days by
membrane feeding method. Data from infected blood feeding experiments showed
that the AcNOS specific activity of the enzyme is rapidly increased with the
days post blood meal. Compared to AcNOS activitiy in An.
culicifacies species A (26.4 µmoles/µgprotein/min, at
day 1 vs. 48.2 µmoles/µgprotein/min, at day 9–14; p<0.001),
An. culicifacies species B exhibited a far more increase
(35.9 µmoles/µgprotein/min, at day 1 vs. 93.3
µmoles/µgprotein/min, at day 9–14; p<0.001) post infected
blood meal (Figure 1B).We also tested the effect of L-NAME, a known inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase
enzyme, to inhibit this AcNOS activity by feeding this inhibitor simultaneously
with the infected blood meals to the mosquito's midguts. The enzyme
activity was found to be markedly inhibited by this L-NAME at all days (1, 3, 7,
and 9–14 days) of blood feeding in both species A and species B. The
significant inhibition in the specific activity
(µmoles/µgprotein/min) was however observed in the refractory
species B at 9–14 days (93.3 vs. 30.9 p<0.001) (Figure 1B). Thus, these data suggested that
induction of the nitric oxide synthase activity is blood and parasite induced
which is inhibited by L-NAME. Higher level of NOS during
Plasmodiuminfection, further indicate that refractory
strains are under chronic state of hostile cyto-toxic stress because of the
production of reactive cytotoxic free radicals viz NO2
-,
NO3
- etc. This induction of the enzyme activity in
mosquito midguts of An. culicifacies species B may be an
inheritable trait of refractory species and may lead to an increased production
of reactive nitrogen species namely nitrate and nitrites which are the stable
reaction products of NO and could contribute to the killing of the parasite in
midguts leading to the refractory phenotype of the An.
culicifacies species B mosquitoes.
Effect of infection on mid-gut and haemolymph NO2
- and
NO3
- levels
To investigate this possibility further, we have measured the differences in
nitrate and nitrite (NO2
- and NO3
-)
within the An. culicifacies mid-gut and hemolymph during early
sporogonic development of P. vivax under semi-natural
conditions of transmission in both sensitive (Species A) and refractory species
(Species B). NO2
- and NO3
-
concentrations in Anopheles species B were found to be
significantly higher than the concentrations in species A. Our data shows that
mid-gut levels of NO2
- and NO3
- were
significantly higher in Plasmodium-infected mosquitoes than in
uninfected mosquitoes at all time points, with the greatest relative difference
at 9 days pBM (Figure 2A and
2B). Levels at 9–10 days pBM may be correlated with induction
and a higher specific activity in infected mosquitoes at this time (Figure 1B). At 14 days pBMnitrate levels in species A & B were 15.11 ± 1.73 µM and 28.6
± 1.54 µM respectively and nitrite levels were 1.98 ± 0.32
µM and 3.48 ± 0.18 µM respectively.
NO2
-/NO3
- midgut concentration
was appeared to be increased in infected mosquitoes at different time points
(Figure 2) and same
pattern was observed in AcNOS enzyme activity above, which indicates the direct
correlation between these two biochemical assays.
Figure 2
Midgut nitrite and nitrate assays.
(A) Nitrite concentrations in sugar fed, uninfected blood fed and
P. vivax infected blood fed An.
culicifacies species A and species B midguts at 1, 3, 7,
9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. (B) Nitrate concentrations in sugar
fed, uninfected blood fed and P. vivax infected blood
fed An. culicifacies species A and species B midguts at
1, 3, 7, 9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. Means were analyzed by
using 2 way ANOVA (p<0.05).
Midgut nitrite and nitrate assays.
(A) Nitrite concentrations in sugar fed, uninfected blood fed and
P. vivaxinfected blood fed An.
culicifacies species A and species B midguts at 1, 3, 7,
9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. (B) Nitrate concentrations in sugar
fed, uninfected blood fed and P. vivax infected blood
fed An. culicifacies species A and species B midguts at
1, 3, 7, 9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. Means were analyzed by
using 2 way ANOVA (p<0.05).We have also determined the hemolymph NO2
- and
NO3
- concentration in SF (0 day), UBF and IBFAn. culicifacies B at different time
periods (1, 3, 7, 9–10 and 14–15 days). Hemolymph
NO2
- and NO3
- concentration of
blood fed P. vivax infected species B were found to be higher
than uninfected mosquitoes This concentration of NO2
- and
NO3
- were found to be time dependent and were
proportionately higher in Plasmodiuminfected mosquitoes than
in uninfected mosquitoes at all time points with the greatest relative
difference at 9–10 days pBM (Figure 3A and 3B).
Figure 3
Hemolymph nitrite and nitrate assays.
(A) Nitrite concentrations in sugar fed, uninfected blood fed and
P. vivax infected blood fed An.
culicifacies species B hemolymph at 1, 3, 7, 9–10 and
14–15 days pBM. (B) Nitrate concentrations in sugar fed,
uninfected blood fed and P. vivax infected blood fed
An. culicifacies species B hemolymph at 1, 3, 7,
9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. Means were analyzed by using 2 way
ANOVA (p<0.05).
Hemolymph nitrite and nitrate assays.
(A) Nitrite concentrations in sugar fed, uninfected blood fed and
P. vivaxinfected blood fed An.
culicifacies species B hemolymph at 1, 3, 7, 9–10 and
14–15 days pBM. (B) Nitrate concentrations in sugar fed,
uninfected blood fed and P. vivaxinfected blood fedAn. culicifacies species B hemolymph at 1, 3, 7,
9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. Means were analyzed by using 2 way
ANOVA (p<0.05).
Oocyst kinetics
We tested the ability of An. culicifacies species B to support
development of P. vivax. An. culicifacies
species A mosquitoes were used as a reference. Three to four-day-old female
mosquitoes were fed via a membrane with gametocytes infected P.
vivax and 9-10 days later their midguts were dissected and the
presence of oocyst and the total parasites per midgut were recorded. The results
from two independent feeding experiments showed 0 of 22 (0/22) and 7 of 39
(7/39) midguts infected (0% and 17.9% oocyst infection prevalence,
respectively) in An. culicifacies species B and the
corresponding median oocyst densities were 0.0 and 2.0 in both experiments
(Table 1). In the
paired feedings of An. culicifacies species A 16/48 and 14/34
midguts had at least some viable oocyst (33.3% and 41.1% oocyst
infection prevalence, respectively) with corresponding median oocyst densities
of 9.0 and 12.0. The live oocyst density was found to be much lower (P<0.001)
in An. culicifacies species B than in An.
culicifacies species A. The distributions of oocyst densities
varied significantly (P<0.01) between the two mosquito species, as one-third
of An. culicifacies species B were observed to have virtually
no oocysts whereas almost every An. culicifacies species A
midgut had one or more (Table
1). Clearance of pre-oocyst parasitic stages and melanization of
ookinetes are established important immune reactions of mosquitoes against
Plasmodium indicating that the inherent mosquito immunity
may be contributing to the reduced susceptibility of An.
culicifacies species B.
Table 1
Oocyst prevalence and Plasmodium vivax infection
density in An. culicifacies species A and species
B.
Experiment.
Species
n
Oocyst prevalence (%)
P
Oocyst density
Range
P
1
An. culicifacies species A
48
27.08 (13/48)
-
9.0
1–43
-
An. culicifacies species B
22
0 (0/22)
ns
0.0
0
<0.01
2
An. culicifacies species A
34
41.17 (14/34)
-
12.0
1–48
-
An. culicifacies species B
39
17.94 (7/39)
<0.001
2
1–5
<0.01
Mosquito mid-guts were examined for P. vivax live
oocysts 9–14 days post infection. Oocyst prevalence is the
percentage of mosquitoes displaying at least one live oocyst, and
Oocyst density is the median number of oocysts in infected
mosquitoes infection of An. culicifacies species B
was not observed in experiment 1. The oocyst prevalence was analyzed
with the chi-square Fishers exact test with Yates correction, and
the oocyst density with the Kruskal –Wallis non-parametric
ANOVA. n: number of mosquitoes, ns: not significant.
Mosquito mid-guts were examined for P. vivax live
oocysts 9–14 days post infection. Oocyst prevalence is the
percentage of mosquitoes displaying at least one live oocyst, and
Oocyst density is the median number of oocysts in infected
mosquitoes infection of An. culicifacies species B
was not observed in experiment 1. The oocyst prevalence was analyzed
with the chi-square Fishers exact test with Yates correction, and
the oocyst density with the Kruskal –Wallis non-parametric
ANOVA. n: number of mosquitoes, ns: not significant.To support this conclusion, we examined the effect of L-NAME, which appeared to
interfere with induced AcNOS (Figure 1B) on P. vivax
development in mosquitoes. No much difference in survivorship was observed
across the treatments in species A. We assessed the mosquito immunity in terms
of NOS physiology by measuring the effect of NOS inhibitor L-NAME on the
melanized ookinetee density in refractory species to determine whether this is
correlated to the killing of the oocysts in the midguts of the refractory
species B (Figure 4). We
observed that the melanized ookinetes were reduced when the mosquitoes were fed
with L-NAME (Figure 4). We
however, did not count the number of melanized ookinetes. Simultaneously, we
also observed that when the refractory mosquitoes An.
culicifacies species B were subjected to L-NAME treatments the live
oocyst count increased in the mosquito midguts (Table 2). This increase was substantial (7
verses 21) in species B as compared to species A (30 verses 42) (Figure 5). However, when the
mosquitoes were fed with D-NAME (Table 2) there was not much effect on the parasite densities of
species A (30 verses 39) or in species B (7 verses 9). These data therefore may
suggested that nitric oxide mediated the cytotoxic effect on the parasites in
the midguts of species B leading to increased melanization of dead ookinetes
which was reduced with the feeding of L-NAME (Figure 4). Inhibition of
AcNOS by L-NAME leads to a reduction of nitrate and
nitrites in the midguts. This could contribute to the reduced susceptibility of
An. culicifacies species B which leads to increase in live
oocyst count.
Figure 4
Plasmodium parasite killing in An.
culicifacies (species A and species B).
(A) Melanized ookinetes (arrows) of P. vivax in
sensitive An. culicifacies species A. (B) Melanized
ookinetes (arrows) of P. vivax in refractory
An. culicifacies species B while crossing the
An. culicifacies midgut. (C) Melanized ookinete in
the midguts of An. culicifacies species B (refractory)
infected with P. vivax treated with NOS inhibitor
L-NAME. Four independent paired experiments were performed. Treatment
with L-NAME decreased the melanized ookinetes count (C) in comparison to
without treatment (B).
Table 2
Effect of L-NAME and D-NAME treatment on oocyst count in
Anopheles culicifacies species A and species
B.
Experiments
Oocyst number/Midgut
Sugar + Gentamicin (50 µg/ml)
L-NAME (1 mg/ml)
D-NAME (1 mg/ml)
An. culicifacies species A
30 ± 3.4 (47)
42 ± 2.9 (49)
39 ± 3.8 (50)
An. culicifacies species B
7 ± 0.5a (22)
21 ± 1.7b (26)
9 ± 0.6a (25)
P. vivax infected blood fed mosquitoes were
maintained on sugar and L-NAME or D-NAME treated or untreated water
until dissection at 7 days pBM to count midgut oocysts. Figures in
the table are depicted as average no. of oocysts per gut ±
SEM. Values in parentheses depict the total no. of midguts
dissected. Data were analyzed by Tukey's test (a>0.05 for
L-NAME v D-NAME experiments, b<0.05 for L-NAME v D-NAME
experiments). Significant differences are indicated by different
letters. pBM: post blood meal, NAME: Nw-nitro-arginine
methyl ester, SEM: standard error mean.
Figure 5
Live oocyst density in the midguts of An.
culicifacies species A and species B infected with
P. vivax.
The geometric means ± SD of the pooled data from the two
independent experiments are shown (Biological replicates). The live
oocyst densities (purple bars) were 30±3.4 for An.
culicifacies species A (n = 47) and
7±0.5 for An. culicifacies species B (blue bars)
(n = 22; P<0.001), and the oocyst densities were
42 ±2.9 and 21±1.7, respectively (P<0.001) following
the L-NAME treatments (n: number of midguts). Oocyst mortality increased
with the L-NAME treatment in both species A and species B.
Plasmodium parasite killing in An.
culicifacies (species A and species B).
(A) Melanized ookinetes (arrows) of P. vivax in
sensitive An. culicifacies species A. (B) Melanized
ookinetes (arrows) of P. vivax in refractory
An. culicifacies species B while crossing the
An. culicifacies midgut. (C) Melanized ookinete in
the midguts of An. culicifacies species B (refractory)
infected with P. vivax treated with NOS inhibitor
L-NAME. Four independent paired experiments were performed. Treatment
with L-NAME decreased the melanized ookinetes count (C) in comparison to
without treatment (B).
Live oocyst density in the midguts of An.
culicifacies species A and species B infected with
P. vivax.
The geometric means ± SD of the pooled data from the two
independent experiments are shown (Biological replicates). The live
oocyst densities (purple bars) were 30±3.4 for An.
culicifacies species A (n = 47) and
7±0.5 for An. culicifacies species B (blue bars)
(n = 22; P<0.001), and the oocyst densities were
42 ±2.9 and 21±1.7, respectively (P<0.001) following
the L-NAME treatments (n: number of midguts). Oocyst mortality increased
with the L-NAME treatment in both species A and species B.P. vivaxinfected blood fed mosquitoes were
maintained on sugar and L-NAME or D-NAME treated or untreated water
until dissection at 7 days pBM to count midgut oocysts. Figures in
the table are depicted as average no. of oocysts per gut ±
SEM. Values in parentheses depict the total no. of midguts
dissected. Data were analyzed by Tukey's test (a>0.05 for
L-NAME v D-NAME experiments, b<0.05 for L-NAME v D-NAME
experiments). Significant differences are indicated by different
letters. pBM: post blood meal, NAME: Nw-nitro-arginine
methyl ester, SEM: standard error mean.
Sequence homology and Phylogenetic analysis of AcNOS
gene
Since we have observed that the AcNOS activity, nitrate and nitrite levels are
higher in the An. culicifacies species B at all times before
and during the blood feeding experiments, we therefore speculate that the
refractory mechanisms of An. culicifacies Species B in terms of
nitric oxide physiologies may be under genetic control. We have therefore used a
PCR-based strategy to amplify exon sequences of AcNOS gene from
a genomic DNA pool constructed from midguts tissue of An.
culicifacies species A and species B adult females using a pair of
primers which were designed from the conserved cofactor-binding domain of NOS
sequences from Anopheles stephensi.Our data on sequencing and ClustalW alignment of the amplified fragments revealed
a high degree of sequence similarity (100%) between An.
culicifacies sp.A and sp.B for AcNOS genes
(accession number: FJ172998 and FJ172999 respectively) (Figure 6). The amplified sequence encodes a
200 residue region (Figure
6A) which revealed 33–100% identical at the amino acid
level to the corresponding region of these known NOS sequences, as well as
100% identical to the recently isolated An. stephensi
NOS sequence (Figure 6B). A
phylogenetic tree (Figure
6C) was constructed on the basis of alignment of the partial
AcNOS amino acid sequence and the corresponding homologous
regions of several invertebrate and vertebrate NOS. Hence in the resulting
dendrogram An. culicifacies species A and species B were in
same clade and vertebrate NOS were in the different clade i.e. obtained by the
Neighbor-joining method (Figure
6C). The deduced amino acid sequences of Monodelphis
domestic NOS, Drosophila melanogaster NOS,
Rattus norvegicus NOS, Homo sapiens NOS,
Anopheles stephensi NOS and Anopheles
culicifacies species A and species B NOS show the highest level of
homology to vertebrate neuronal NOS, followed by decreasing homologies to
vertebrate endothelial and inducible NOS genes.
Figure 6
Homology analysis of An. culicifacies sp A and sp
B.
(A) PCR amplification of Exon-1 region (200 bp) fragment of mosquito
nitric oxide synthase (NOS): L1: 100 bp marker (M); L2: An
stephensi (S): L3: An. culicifacies sp A:
L4: An. culicifacies sp B. (B) Clustal alignment of
AcNOS with known homologus NOS sequence of other insect and vertebrate.
Highly conserved and similar residues have been shown dark black &
grey respectively. Relative sequences identity has also been shown. (C)
Phylogenetic bootstrap consensus tree based on amino acid sequence
alignment using Neighbor- joining method. Length of Horizontal lines is
proportional to the minimum number of amino acids differences required
to join nodes. Numerical numbers in the nodes are bootstrap confidence
intervals which were calculated by 1000 heuristic search replicates. The
evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction
method. Species name and respective sequences accession numbers
includes; M. d: Monodelphis domestic (XP_001362705.1);
D. m: Drosophila melanogaster (AAF25682.1); R.n:
Rattus norvegicus (NP_434686.1); A.c_A:
Anopheles culicifacies sp A (FJ172997); A.c_B:
Anopheles culicifacies sp B (FJ172998); A.s:
Anopheles stephensi (061608.2); H.s: Homo
sapiens(NP_000611.1).
Homology analysis of An. culicifacies sp A and sp
B.
(A) PCR amplification of Exon-1 region (200 bp) fragment of mosquito
nitric oxide synthase (NOS): L1: 100 bp marker (M); L2: An
stephensi (S): L3: An. culicifacies sp A:
L4: An. culicifaciessp B. (B) Clustal alignment of
AcNOS with known homologus NOS sequence of other insect and vertebrate.
Highly conserved and similar residues have been shown dark black &
grey respectively. Relative sequences identity has also been shown. (C)
Phylogenetic bootstrap consensus tree based on amino acid sequence
alignment using Neighbor- joining method. Length of Horizontal lines is
proportional to the minimum number of amino acids differences required
to join nodes. Numerical numbers in the nodes are bootstrap confidence
intervals which were calculated by 1000 heuristic search replicates. The
evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction
method. Species name and respective sequences accession numbers
includes; M. d: Monodelphis domestic (XP_001362705.1);
D. m: Drosophila melanogaster (AAF25682.1); R.n:
Rattus norvegicus (NP_434686.1); A.c_A:
Anopheles culicifacies sp A (FJ172997); A.c_B:
Anopheles culicifaciessp B (FJ172998); A.s:
Anopheles stephensi (061608.2); H.s: Homo
sapiens(NP_000611.1).
Differential expression of Nitric oxide synthase
(AcNOS)
Since it is not possible to correlate An. culicifacies species A
and An. culicifacies species B using PCR as both the species
were found to be identical, the relative expression level of
AcNOS transcript in both P. vivax infected
sibling species was analyzed by using primers designed against An.
stephensi phenotypes by semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Figure 7A). First we measured
the basal level of NOS expression pattern by semi-quantitative RT-PCR in the
midgut tissue collected at 24 hr post feeding using constitutively expressing S7
Ribosome protein gene as an internal control. As expected, in comparison to
species A, we observed an increased NOS expression observed in An.
culicifacies species B (Figure 7A).
Figure 7
Agarose gel showing semi-quantitative RT-PCR assayed transcriptional
induction of AcNOS in parasite induced midguts.
(A) Transcriptional induction in SF, UBF, IBF An.
culicifacies species A and species B (24 hr pBM) (B)
Transcriptional induction of An. culicifacies species B
(UBF, IBF) on 7 days and 9–14 days pBM. All cDNA templates were
normalized for equal yield of ribosomal protein S7 RT-PCR products. SF:
sugar fed, UBF: uninfected blood fed, IBF: infected blood fed.
Agarose gel showing semi-quantitative RT-PCR assayed transcriptional
induction of AcNOS in parasite induced midguts.
(A) Transcriptional induction in SF, UBF, IBF An.
culicifacies species A and species B (24 hr pBM) (B)
Transcriptional induction of An. culicifacies species B
(UBF, IBF) on 7 days and 9–14 days pBM. All cDNA templates were
normalized for equal yield of ribosomal protein S7 RT-PCR products. SF:
sugar fed, UBF: uninfected blood fed, IBF: infected blood fed.NOS induction was seen at all stages of parasite development in both species A
and species B. Interestingly, NOS expression was found to be much more in
Anopheles species B at 7 days in comparison to the
9–14 days (Figure 7B).
At 9–14 days pBM, however, when AcNOS expression was
induced in infected mosquitoes, the specific activity was 2-fold higher in
infected mosquitoes. Increase levels of NOS expression in mid-guts of species B
mosquitoes fed on P. vivax infected blood containing parasites
and gametocytes may reveal that early sporogonic stages of P.
vivax are able to increase NOS expression from day 1 to day 14.
AcNOS was expressed constitutively and was
transcriptionally upregulated post blood meals in the refractory species B. A
proportional increase in transcript abundance of 12 fold from day 1 to day 14
was observed (Figure 8)
through out the blood feeding experiments in P. vivax infected
mosquitoes species B.
Figure 8
Transcript abundance in sugar fed, uninfected and Plasmodium
vivax infected An. culicifacies species B
midguts.
Total RNA from midguts of sugar fed (SF), uninfected and P.
vivax infected blood fed was assayed using
semi-quantitative RT-PCR for AcNOS at 1, 3, 7,
9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. The RT-PCR images were evaluated
and integrated pixel values in respective bands were quantified on a
grey scale and normalized to the ribosome S7 protein transcripts. Data
with in each treatment from 3 replicates (biological replicates) were
analyzed using 2 way ANOVA.
Transcript abundance in sugar fed, uninfected and Plasmodium
vivax infected An. culicifacies species B
midguts.
Total RNA from midguts of sugar fed (SF), uninfected and P.
vivax infected blood fed was assayed using
semi-quantitative RT-PCR for AcNOS at 1, 3, 7,
9–10 and 14–15 days pBM. The RT-PCR images were evaluated
and integrated pixel values in respective bands were quantified on a
grey scale and normalized to the ribosome S7 protein transcripts. Data
with in each treatment from 3 replicates (biological replicates) were
analyzed using 2 way ANOVA.Finally for a comparative study of the relative abundance of the NOS transcripts
in An. culicifacies susceptible and refractory
species, a real-time RT-PCR analysis was undertaken on samples from midgut
tissues at 7 days pBM. Temporal expression of AcNOS was
monitored by real time PCR after feeding of mosquitoes (Figure 9). The threshold values (Ct) show
that NOS transcript in midgut tissue was 21.13 for An.
culicifacies species A and 18.56 for An.
culicifacies species B. The lower Ct value of NOS for species B
indicates that NOS is more abundant in the midgut tissue of species B. Thus, in
An. culicifacies, unexpectedly we observed 11 fold
induction of NOS gene in refractory species as compared to susceptible
species.
Figure 9
Expression pattern of NOS in mid gut of An. culicifacies
Sp A and Sp B
(n = 25–30) at 7 days
pBM.
Relative transcript abundance of AcNOS in P. vivax blood
infected susceptible (species A) and refractory strain (species B). Gene
transcript quantity was measured by relative RT-PCR using the internal
standard S7 RNA polymerase gene. Error bars represent standard deviation
from three independent experiments (PCR replicates) are shown.
Expression pattern of NOS in mid gut of An. culicifacies
Sp A and Sp B
(n = 25–30) at 7 days
pBM.
Relative transcript abundance of AcNOS in P. vivax blood
infected susceptible (species A) and refractory strain (species B). Gene
transcript quantity was measured by relative RT-PCR using the internal
standard S7 RNA polymerase gene. Error bars represent standard deviation
from three independent experiments (PCR replicates) are shown.
Discussion
The Plasmodium undergoes a complex developmental interplay during
its lifecycle in mosquitoes. This interaction between vector and parasite is
essential for malaria transmission. The capacity of mosquitoes to transmit malaria
is determined by numerous factors such as their longevity, feeding preference, and
permissiveness to parasite development in the mosquito midgut [41]. It is clear that species
specific mosquito-parasite strain combinations are essential for the development of
parasite in the mosquitoes. To this end, not all mosquito-parasite strain
combinations are compatible: some Plasmodium strains are unable to
develop in certain refractory mosquito strains because of innate immune system in
mosquitoes that eliminate all ingested Plasmodia
[12], [16], [22].Most of the recent research efforts have focused mainly on blocking parasite
development in mosquitoes by targeting gametocytes [32], ookinettes [42] in the mid
guts of the mosquitoes. Research concerning mid gut biology exploits parasite entry
mechanisms [43],
melanization [44], and transcriptionally activated mosquitoes immune
response related antiplosmodial genes [45] and free radicals namely ROS,
RNS and nitric oxide [46], [47]. Advances in molecular biology have allowed us to
characterize mosquitoes that reduce Plasmodium transmission [14]. The development
of genetically modified Anopheles mosquitoes and transformation and
availability of mosquitoes that exhibit enhanced refractoriness to
Plasmodium spp. is regarded as a model for potential strategies
for control of malaria transmission [48], [49].
Refractory species
Naturally occurring, malaria resistant strains are termed as refractory
mosquitoes and these are very rare in the field. Low occurrence of such
resistant phenotypes is attributed to acute selection pressures on the innate
immune system of mosquitoes. Anopheles culicifaces, a rural
Indian vector of malaria is a complex of five sibling species, of which species
B has been known to be a refractory species [17]. Sibling species are
phylogenetically closely related to each other, are morphologically
indistinguishable, and can crossbreed in captivity; however, they vary greatly
in their capacity to transmit humanmalaria. The isolation of a wild An.
culicifaces strain B which is refractory to Plasmodium
vivax infection [6], [17] presents an opportunity to use this laboratory model
of infection for research related to understanding the molecular basis of
refractoriness.
Induction of parasite killing
Malaria parasites are often killed by various intracellular events that may
include nutrient deprivation, lysis or melanization, drug treatments and the
presence of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitrogen
species (RNS) in the mosquito midgut epithelium, which are controlled by
reactions of the mosquito innate immune system leading to refractoriness in
mosquitoes. Large losses in parasite numbers occurs at the ookinete-to-oocyst
transition stage of its life cycle [50], [51]. These losses are
correlated with transcriptional activation of innate immunity genes by malariainfection during invasion of epithelial tissues and translocation to the
salivary glands [52]. Three molecules with recognition functions, TEP1,
LR1M1 and APL1 also have parasite killing activity however, the mechanism is
incompletely understood [33], [34], [53]. The search for antiparasite effectors in the
refractory species Anopheles has identified some promising
targets in the immune-responsive mosquito, including melanotic encapsulation
[44],
[52],
[54],
antimicrobial peptides such as defensins [55], nitric oxide synthase [56]. NO or its
derivatives, play a role in the immunological reaction of the host defense
against the parasites [57]. NO has also been known to produce nitrosative stress
which may lead to apoptosis by activation of mitochondrial apoptotic pathway
[58]. These
toxic molecules may thus act triggers of apoptosis and elimination in
Plasmodium killing in refractory mosquitoes. The
availability of NO through white blood cells, through blood feeding and through
mid gut cells has indisputable effects for gametocyte and ookinete killing in
the mosquito midguts [32], [42].
Implication of nitric oxide in Plasmodium killing in
refractory species
The enzyme NOS is responsible for the formation of nitric oxide (NO) which, is
involved in many physiological processes such as vasodilator activity in saliva
[59],
neurotransmission in brain [60] and defense killing of bacteria and macroparasites.
Previous studies on vertebrate and invertebrates has shown that, among other
physiological functions, nitric oxide is universally involved in immune
responses, acting as signaling as well as cytotoxic molecule [26]. In this
study we explored the possible role of NO in refractory mechanism in
vivo on phylogenetically related susceptible (species A) and
refractory (species B) sibling species of An. culicifacies in
terms of nitric oxide physiologies and NOS mediated innate immunity. Here, we
have shown that AcNOS exhibit potent antagonistic effects against
Plasmodium species via the production of reactive nitrogen
intermediates in sensitive and refractory sibling species. These reactive
nitrogen species are implicated in the killing of the parasites as reported
previously [46], [47], [56]. This observation strongly supports the previous
observation that NOS is a dynamic multifunctional enzyme that not only required
for physiological integrity, but also participate as an important effectors
molecules of innate immunity.We extended our studies to examine the possible involvement of AcNOS in
refractoriness of mosquito An. culcifacies. Interestingly,
compared to susceptible strain of An. culicifacies species A,
refractory species B exhibited an increased AcNOS enzyme activity, nitrates and
nitrites in midguts and hemolymph. The similarity of AcNOS
induction patterns following feeding on uninfected blood and infected blood
suggests that parasite infected blood acts as an important signal for
AcNOS induction prior to 1 day of infection. In the current
study, elevated levels of NO synthase (NOS), an enzyme critical for the
production of NO, were noted in the midguts of P.
vivax-infected An. culicifacies on 7 days post
infection compared with control mosquitoes. AcNOS activity in infected blood fed
mosquitoes of species A was relatively changed only slightly by L-NAME at 7
days, whereas activity in infected blood fed mosquitoes in species B was
significantly inhibited by L-NAME (P<0.005, Figure 1B). Although the
production of NO may be induced by the presence of the parasite in the mosquito,
this production also could be due to tissue damage or stress created by the
invading parasite where higher level of toxic byproducts may involved in the
parasite killing by unknown mechanism. However, regardless of the NO induction
trigger, the parasite burdens in the mosquito, although not eliminated, seem to
be negatively affected by NO production [25].
Effect of L-NAME on Oocyst development
The malaria parasite is at its most vulnerable stage within the mosquito midgut,
less than 10% ookinetes successfully cross the midgut epithelium and form
oocysts. After this, the number of parasites dramatically increases when each
oocyst generates several thousand sporozoites [61]. Thus, the strong bottleneck
in parasite numbers makes ookinetes, an ideal target for interference with
transmission. We tested the effect of NOS on the oocyst development of humanmalaria parasite P. vivax. Refractory species,
Anopheles culicifacies species B exhibited a reduced oocyst
prevelence in their midguts 9–10 days post infection as compared to
susceptible species. However, we have also observed a significant increase in
the live oocyst density in the refractory strain when fed on infected blood meal
supplemented with L-NAME. The effects of L-NAME suggest that parasites are
targeted before or during the oocyst development, a hypothesis which seems to be
consistent with the demonstrated susceptibility of parasites to NO damage [56].
NOS-specific inhibitor specifically fully rescued the susceptibility phenotype
in refractory mosquitoes, causing an approximate 4-fold increase in the oocyst
density, and 71% increase in oocyst prevalence. The increase in the
number of oocysts observed in response to infected blood in An.
culicifacies species A could be an amplified midgut response to
parasite infection: however, this midgut response seems to be significant in
An. culicifacies species B. Furthermore, feeding of NOS
inhibitor L-NAME, increases mean oocyst infections while D-NAME, the inactive
isomer has no effect (Table
2). Luckhart et al [28] has reported similar effect when An.
stephensi mosquitoes were fed on L-NAME and D-NAME. A decreased
oocyst infection in An. culicifacies species B (Table 2) may be attributed
to the susceptibility of P. vivax to Anopheles culicifacies
midgut stages to nitric oxide (NO). These data clearly demonstrated that
AcNOS could be an important player in the development of
refractory nature of the mosquito and need to be explored further.
Transcriptional upregulation of AcNOS gene
Our knowledge of NOS function in invertebrates is still limited [62], and the
gene has only been cloned from a few insect species [28], [60]. In view of the multiple
physiological roles of NO, it is quite possible that the effects on NOS will
prove to be related to the success of parasite infection [28]. Our sequence analysis
results of the amplified fragment of AcNOS gene revealed a high
degree of sequence similarity between An. culicifacies species
A and species B. This was not surprising as the two species are very closely
related in the evolutionary scale and genetic introgression has likely taken
place for some time after their separation and may be regarded more as a
reflection of gene ancestry than functional activity [54].To evaluate the temporal expression of AcNOS gene in An.
culicifaces species A and species B experiments were designed to
determine whether P. vivax parasite could transcriptionally
induce the upregulation of NOS gene by semiquantitative RT-PCR and real time PCR
analysis. Our data have concluded that AcNOS gene is more
abundantly expressed in midgut of species B than in species A. We show that NOS
expression is transcriptionally upregulated in the midgut in response to
Plasmodiuminfection and induction of NOS is proportional
to the intensity of infection [63]. Our results show that An.
culicifaces does have a shared evolutionary history with P.
vivax and thus in principle host resistance mechanisms, including
AcNOS, could have been selected by the parasite, although
to date this have not been proven. We hypothesize that upregulation of mosquito
innate cytotoxicity due to NOS in refractory strain to Plasmodium
vivax infection may contribute to natural refractoriness in
An. culicifacies mosquito population. This innate capacity
of refractory mosquitoes could represent the ancestral function of the mosquito
immune system against the parasite and could be utilized to understand the
molecular basis of refractoriness in planning effective vector control
strategies. A better understanding of the natural mechanisms of host defense
against the Plasmodium parasite may provide new targets for
therapeutic intervention in this disease.
Conclusions
Attention has largely focused on mosquitoes innate immune responses that may lead
to cytotoxic killing, lysis and melanization of the parasites. NO, RNS and ROS
are known to kill parasites in oxidation-reduction reactions and may play a role
in the refractory mechanisms. However, the importance of NOS activity in
inducing cytotoxic killing of the parasites needs to be ascertained in order to
show the feasibility to augment the activity of NOS for killing of the
parasites. In this study, we have utilized a naturally selected non-vector
An. culicifacies species B in conjunction with the
An. culicifacies species A as a model vector system, to
understand the differences contributing to its reduced vectorial capacity. The
phenotype of this refractory An. culicifacies species B strain
is identical to that of other An. culicifacies sibling species
complex. Dissecting the molecular basis of refractoriness in Anopheles
culicifacies model system may pave the way to novel disease control
mechanisms. Experimental evidences relating to increased NOS activity and
reduced oocyst development do suggest the evolutionary significance of the
existence of a cytotoxic innate immunity system operating in refractory species.
It is therefore, tempting to speculate that persistent interaction of
An. culicifacies with P. vivax might have
led to an evolutionary co adaptation between the mosquito immune responses and
this parasite, whereas the refractory phenotype could represent the ancestral
function of the mosquito immune system against the parasite. This immune system
could operate via triggering of mosquito AcNOS activity by the
Plasmodium vivax dependent manner. The latter implying that
AcNOS cytotoxic mechanism of parasite killing in the mosquito midgut lumen could
be an important transmission blocking strategy. Based on the present data on
Anopheles culicifacies NOS which has been shown to be
transcriptionally regulated, we believe that the study of this gene is a
promising approach to unravel yet unknown NOS-dependent production of nitric
oxide elements, leading to a better insight in different aspects of insect
physiology in terms of refractoriness. Future research will aim to determine if
any of these changes or any cofactors to the enzyme AcNOS can enhance or
otherwise alter the function of this AcNOS gene and gene
elements, thus contributing to the refractoriness phenotype for novel malaria
control strategies.
Authors: Jose E Pietri; Eduardo J Pietri; Rashaun Potts; Michael A Riehle; Shirley Luckhart Journal: Dev Comp Immunol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Daniele P Castro; Caroline S Moraes; Marcelo S Gonzalez; Norman A Ratcliffe; Patrícia Azambuja; Eloi S Garcia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240