David M Swoboda1, David A Sallman2. 1. Department of Hematology and Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive FOB 3rd Floor, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 2. Department of Hematology and Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive FOB 3rd Floor, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. David.Sallman@moffitt.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Genetic sequencing in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has provided an improved understanding of the complexity and heterozygosity of the disease. More importantly, our molecular understanding of MDS is leading to rapid advancements and personalized therapy for our patients. Herein, we review the current mutation-driven treatment landscape in MDS, first focusing on individual mutations. We then discuss the effect of specific gene mutations on response and outcomes to standard therapies as well as to cutting edge investigational therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Molecular annotation of MDS can predict response rates and outcomes to our current standard of care therapies including hypomethylating agents, lenalidomide, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clinical trials targeting molecular subsets of MDS are underway with some in very early stages while others advancing to phase III trials. Targeting TP53 and IDH1/2 mutations appear to be promising targets with substantial efficacy seen in several trials to date. Furthermore, novel therapeutic strategies such as immuno-oncology agents are of significant interest with future investigation required to understand the molecular predictors of response. Mutation-driven therapy in MDS is rapidly expanding and has tremendous potential in a disease where limited standard therapy options exist.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Genetic sequencing in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has provided an improved understanding of the complexity and heterozygosity of the disease. More importantly, our molecular understanding of MDS is leading to rapid advancements and personalized therapy for our patients. Herein, we review the current mutation-driven treatment landscape in MDS, first focusing on individual mutations. We then discuss the effect of specific gene mutations on response and outcomes to standard therapies as well as to cutting edge investigational therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Molecular annotation of MDS can predict response rates and outcomes to our current standard of care therapies including hypomethylating agents, lenalidomide, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clinical trials targeting molecular subsets of MDS are underway with some in very early stages while others advancing to phase III trials. Targeting TP53 and IDH1/2 mutations appear to be promising targets with substantial efficacy seen in several trials to date. Furthermore, novel therapeutic strategies such as immuno-oncology agents are of significant interest with future investigation required to understand the molecular predictors of response. Mutation-driven therapy in MDS is rapidly expanding and has tremendous potential in a disease where limited standard therapy options exist.
Authors: W Ingram; N C Lea; J Cervera; U Germing; P Fenaux; B Cassinat; J J Kiladjian; J Varkonyi; P Antunovic; N B Westwood; M J Arno; A Mohamedali; J Gaken; T Kontou; B H Czepulkowski; N A Twine; J Tamaska; J Csomer; S Benedek; N Gattermann; E Zipperer; A Giagounidis; Z Garcia-Casado; G Sanz; G J Mufti Journal: Leukemia Date: 2006-04-13 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Lewis R Silverman; David R McKenzie; Bercedis L Peterson; James F Holland; Jay T Backstrom; C L Beach; Richard A Larson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Omar Abdel-Wahab; Ann Mullally; Cyrus Hedvat; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jay Patel; Martha Wadleigh; Sebastien Malinge; JinJuan Yao; Outi Kilpivaara; Rukhmi Bhat; Kety Huberman; Sabrena Thomas; Igor Dolgalev; Adriana Heguy; Elisabeth Paietta; Michelle M Le Beau; Miloslav Beran; Martin S Tallman; Benjamin L Ebert; Hagop M Kantarjian; Richard M Stone; D Gary Gilliland; John D Crispino; Ross L Levine Journal: Blood Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael Andreeff; Kevin R Kelly; Karen Yee; Sarit Assouline; Roger Strair; Leslie Popplewell; David Bowen; Giovanni Martinelli; Mark W Drummond; Paresh Vyas; Mark Kirschbaum; Swaminathan Padmanabhan Iyer; Vivian Ruvolo; Graciela M Nogueras González; Xuelin Huang; Gong Chen; Bradford Graves; Steven Blotner; Peter Bridge; Lori Jukofsky; Steve Middleton; Monica Reckner; Ruediger Rueger; Jianguo Zhi; Gwen Nichols; Kensuke Kojima Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stanley Chun-Wei Lee; Heidi Dvinge; Eunhee Kim; Hana Cho; Jean-Baptiste Micol; Young Rock Chung; Benjamin H Durham; Akihide Yoshimi; Young Joon Kim; Michael Thomas; Camille Lobry; Chun-Wei Chen; Alessandro Pastore; Justin Taylor; Xujun Wang; Andrei Krivtsov; Scott A Armstrong; James Palacino; Silvia Buonamici; Peter G Smith; Robert K Bradley; Omar Abdel-Wahab Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 53.440