Literature DB >> 21482915

Lack of evidence for the efficacy of memantine in mild Alzheimer disease.

Lon S Schneider1, Karen S Dagerman, Julian P T Higgins, Rupert McShane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We directly assessed the clinical trials' evidence for memantine's efficacy in mild Alzheimer disease (AD). Memantine is indicated in the United States and Europe for moderate to severe AD, which is diagnosed if a patient has a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of less than 15 or less than 20, respectively. Yet memantine is very frequently prescribed for mild AD and mild cognitive impairment, and a manufacturer-sponsored meta-analysis claimed its efficacy in mild AD. DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, AND DATA EXTRACTION: Manufacturer-sponsored meta-analyses, registries, presentations, and publications were systematically searched for randomized placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trials of memantine in patients with mild to moderate AD. The trials' characteristics and outcomes were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another. Meta-analyses were performed as inverse variance-weighted averages of mean differences using fixed-effects models. Summary results for patients with mild AD were obtained by contrasting the summary results for patients with mild or moderate AD with the summary results for the subset of patients with moderate AD. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three trials were identified that included 431 patients with mild AD (ie, with MMSE scores of 20-23) and 697 patients with moderate AD (ie, with MMSE scores of 10-19). There were no significant differences between memantine and placebo on any outcome for patients with mild AD, either within any trial or when data were combined: mean differences (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus caregiver's input (CIBIC-plus), the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL) scale, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) were -0.17 (95% CI, -1.60 to 1.26), -0.09 (95% CI, -0.30 to 0.12), 0.62 (95% CI, -1.64 to 2.71), and 0.09 (95% CI, -2.11 to 2.29), respectively. For patients with moderate AD, there were small differences on the ADAS-cog and the CIBIC-plus, -1.33 (95% CI, -2.28 to -0.38) and -0.16 (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.00), respectively, but no differences on the ADCS-ADL scale (-0.57 [95% CI, -1.75 to 0.60]) or the NPI (0.25 [95% CI, -1.48 to 1.99]).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite its frequent off-label use, evidence is lacking for a benefit of memantine in mild AD, and there is meager evidence for its efficacy in moderate AD. Prospective trials are needed to further assess the potential for efficacy of memantine either alone or added to cholinesterase inhibitors in mild and moderate AD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482915     DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  77 in total

1.  Revised criteria for mild cognitive impairment may compromise the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease dementia.

Authors:  John C Morris
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2012-06

2.  Effect of vitamin E and memantine on functional decline in Alzheimer disease: the TEAM-AD VA cooperative randomized trial.

Authors:  Maurice W Dysken; Mary Sano; Sanjay Asthana; Julia E Vertrees; Muralidhar Pallaki; Maria Llorente; Susan Love; Gerard D Schellenberg; J Riley McCarten; Julie Malphurs; Susana Prieto; Peijun Chen; David J Loreck; George Trapp; Rajbir S Bakshi; Jacobo E Mintzer; Judith L Heidebrink; Ana Vidal-Cardona; Lillian M Arroyo; Angel R Cruz; Sally Zachariah; Neil W Kowall; Mohit P Chopra; Suzanne Craft; Stephen Thielke; Carolyn L Turvey; Catherine Woodman; Kimberly A Monnell; Kimberly Gordon; Julie Tomaska; Yoav Segal; Peter N Peduzzi; Peter D Guarino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Comparison of the efficacy of four cholinesterase inhibitors in combination with memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Zi-Qiang Shao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 4.  A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Dementia Medications: Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Jacob S Buckley; Shelley R Salpeter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  GABAergic Networks in the Prefrontal Cortex and Working Memory.

Authors:  Cristina Bañuelos; Marta Urszula Wołoszynowska-Fraser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Weight Loss in Patients with Dementia: Considering the Potential Impact of Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Bart A A Franx; Ilse A C Arnoldussen; Amanda J Kiliaan; Deborah R Gustafson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Combining drug and music therapy in patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized study.

Authors:  Anna Rita Giovagnoli; Valentina Manfredi; Letizia Schifano; Chiara Paterlini; Annalisa Parente; Fabrizio Tagliavini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Alzheimer's Disease Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Maria Revi
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 10.  [Therapy for patients with dementia. Treatment strategies in the elderly].

Authors:  F Jessen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.