Literature DB >> 21482692

Assessment of chk1 phosphorylation as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of chk1 inhibition.

Leslie A Parsels1, Yushen Qian, Daria M Tanska, Marisa Gross, Lili Zhao, Maria C Hassan, Sankari Arumugarajah, Joshua D Parsels, Linda Hylander-Gans, Diane M Simeone, Deborah Morosini, Jeffrey L Brown, Sonya D Zabludoff, Jonathan Maybaum, Theodore S Lawrence, Meredith A Morgan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chk1 inhibitors, such as AZD7762, are in clinical development in combination with cytotoxic agents for the treatment of solid tumors, including pancreatic cancers. To maximize the likelihood of their clinical success, it is essential to optimize drug scheduling as well as pharmacodynamic biomarkers in preclinical models. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We tested multiple schedules of administration of gemcitabine and AZD7762 on the survival of pancreatic cancer cells. Potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers including pChk1, pChk2, pHistone H3, and caspase-3 were evaluated in vitro, followed by assessment of promising candidate biomarkers in vivo. We then went on to determine the contributions of PP2A and DNA damage to the mechanism(s) of induction of the identified biomarker, pS345 Chk1.
RESULTS: AZD7762 given during and after or after gemcitabine administration produced maximum chemosensitization. In vivo, AZD7762 significantly inhibited the growth of pancreatic tumor xenografts in response to gemcitabine. Of the biomarkers assessed, pS345 Chk1 was most consistently increased in response to gemcitabine and AZD7762 in tumors and normal tissues (hair follicles). pS345 Chk1 induction in response to gemcitabine and AZD7762 occurred in the presence of PP2A inhibition and in association with elevated γH2AX, suggesting that DNA damage is an underlying mechanism.
CONCLUSIONS: AZD7762 sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells and tumors to gemcitabine in association with induction of pS345 Chk1. Together these data support the clinical investigation of AZD7762 with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer under a dosing schedule in which gemcitabine is administered concurrent with or before AZD7762 and in conjunction with skin biopsies to measure pS345 Chk1. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482692      PMCID: PMC3107893          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  28 in total

1.  Chk1 inhibition after replicative stress activates a double strand break response mediated by ATM and DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  Samuel McNeely; Chiara Conti; Tahir Sheikh; Himali Patel; Sonya Zabludoff; Yves Pommier; Gary Schwartz; Archie Tse
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  AZD7762, a novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, drives checkpoint abrogation and potentiates DNA-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Sonya D Zabludoff; Chun Deng; Michael R Grondine; Adam M Sheehy; Susan Ashwell; Benjamin L Caleb; Stephen Green; Heather R Haye; Candice L Horn; James W Janetka; Dongfang Liu; Elizabeth Mouchet; Shannon Ready; Judith L Rosenthal; Christophe Queva; Gary K Schwartz; Karen J Taylor; Archie N Tse; Graeme E Walker; Anne M White
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Ouabain sensitizes tumor cells but not normal cells to radiation.

Authors:  T S Lawrence
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors.

Authors:  T C Chou; P Talalay
Journal:  Adv Enzyme Regul       Date:  1984

5.  The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair.

Authors:  Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen; Jaroslaw Dziegielewski; Randi G Syljuåsen; Cecilia Lundin; Jiri Bartek; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  In vitro and in vivo radiation sensitization of human tumor cells by a novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, AZD7762.

Authors:  James B Mitchell; Rajani Choudhuri; Kristin Fabre; Anastasia L Sowers; Deborah Citrin; Sonya D Zabludoff; John A Cook
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Chenwei Li; David G Heidt; Piero Dalerba; Charles F Burant; Lanjing Zhang; Volkan Adsay; Max Wicha; Michael F Clarke; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Gemcitabine sensitization by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition correlates with inhibition of a Rad51 DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Leslie A Parsels; Meredith A Morgan; Daria M Tanska; Joshua D Parsels; Brian D Palmer; R John Booth; William A Denny; Christine E Canman; Alan J Kraker; Theodore S Lawrence; Jonathan Maybaum
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 9.  New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network.

Authors:  Yun Dai; Steven Grant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Breaching the DNA damage checkpoint via PF-00477736, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1.

Authors:  Alessandra Blasina; Jill Hallin; Enhong Chen; Maria Elena Arango; Eugenia Kraynov; James Register; Stephan Grant; Sacha Ninkovic; Ping Chen; Tim Nichols; Patrick O'Connor; Kenna Anderes
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.261

View more
  43 in total

1.  The contribution of DNA replication stress marked by high-intensity, pan-nuclear γH2AX staining to chemosensitization by CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Leslie A Parsels; Joshua D Parsels; Daria M Tanska; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  DW-MRI as a Predictive Biomarker of Radiosensitization of GBM through Targeted Inhibition of Checkpoint Kinases.

Authors:  Terence M Williams; Stefanie Galbán; Fei Li; Kevin A Heist; Craig J Galbán; Theodore S Lawrence; Eric C Holland; Tami L Thomae; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 4.243

3.  ATR inhibition broadly sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy independent of BRCA status.

Authors:  Catherine J Huntoon; Karen S Flatten; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Amelia M Huehls; Shari L Sutor; Scott H Kaufmann; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Sensitization of pancreatic cancer to chemoradiation by the Chk1 inhibitor MK8776.

Authors:  Carl G Engelke; Leslie A Parsels; Yushen Qian; Qiang Zhang; David Karnak; Jordan R Robertson; Daria M Tanska; Dongping Wei; Mary A Davis; Joshua D Parsels; Lili Zhao; Joel K Greenson; Theodore S Lawrence; Jonathan Maybaum; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  CHK1 levels correlate with sensitization to pemetrexed by CHK1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Svetlana Grabauskiene; Edward J Bergeron; Guoan Chen; Andrew C Chang; Jules Lin; Dafydd G Thomas; Thomas J Giordano; David G Beer; Meredith A Morgan; Rishindra M Reddy
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Checkpoint kinase 1 protein expression indicates sensitization to therapy by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Svetlana Grabauskiene; Edward J Bergeron; Guoan Chen; Dafydd G Thomas; Thomas J Giordano; David G Beer; Meredith A Morgan; Rishindra M Reddy
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Selective radiosensitization of p53 mutant pancreatic cancer cells by combined inhibition of Chk1 and PARP1.

Authors:  Sean Vance; Erqi Liu; Lili Zhao; Joshua D Parsels; Leslie A Parsels; Jeffery L Brown; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Dissociation of gemcitabine chemosensitization by CHK1 inhibition from cell cycle checkpoint abrogation and aberrant mitotic entry.

Authors:  Leslie A Parsels; Daria M Tanska; Joshua D Parsels; Sonya D Zabludoff; Kyle C Cuneo; Theodore S Lawrence; Jonathan Maybaum; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  The MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 mediates gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Frederik Köpper; Anna Maria Binkowski; Cathrin Bierwirth; Matthias Dobbelstein
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 10.  Improving the efficacy of chemoradiation with targeted agents.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 39.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.