Literature DB >> 23548269

ATR inhibition broadly sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy independent of BRCA status.

Catherine J Huntoon1, Karen S Flatten, Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson, Amelia M Huehls, Shari L Sutor, Scott H Kaufmann, Larry M Karnitz.   

Abstract

Replication stress and DNA damage activate the ATR-Chk1 checkpoint signaling pathway that licenses repair and cell survival processes. In this study, we examined the respective roles of the ATR and Chk1 kinases in ovarian cancer cells using genetic and pharmacologic inhibitors in combination with cisplatin, topotecan, gemcitabine, and the PARP inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888), four agents with clinical activity in ovarian cancer. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated depletion or inhibition of ATR sensitized ovarian cancer cells to all four agents. In contrast, while cisplatin, topotecan, and gemcitabine each activated Chk1, RNAi-mediated depletion or inhibition of this kinase in cells sensitized them only to gemcitabine. Unexpectedly, we found that neither the ATR kinase inhibitor VE-821 nor the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 blocked ATR-mediated Chk1 phosphorylation or autophosphorylation, two commonly used readouts for inhibition of the ATR-Chk1 pathway. Instead, their ability to sensitize cells correlated with enhanced CDC25A levels. In addition, we also found that VE-821 could further sensitize BRCA1-depleted cells to cisplatin, topotecan, and veliparib beyond the potent sensitization already caused by their deficiency in homologous recombination. Taken together, our results established that ATR and Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize ovarian cancer cells to commonly used chemotherapy agents and that Chk1 phosphorylation status may not offer a reliable marker for inhibition of the ATR-Chk1 pathway. A key implication of our work is the clinical rationale it provides to evaluate ATR inhibitors in combination with PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2-deficient cells. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548269      PMCID: PMC3687010          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

1.  Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Sebastian Vaughan; Jermaine I Coward; Robert C Bast; Andy Berchuck; Jonathan S Berek; James D Brenton; George Coukos; Christopher C Crum; Ronny Drapkin; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Michael Friedlander; Hani Gabra; Stan B Kaye; Chris J Lord; Ernst Lengyel; Douglas A Levine; Iain A McNeish; Usha Menon; Gordon B Mills; Kenneth P Nephew; Amit M Oza; Anil K Sood; Euan A Stronach; Henning Walczak; David D Bowtell; Frances R Balkwill
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Preclinical development of the novel Chk1 inhibitor SCH900776 in combination with DNA-damaging agents and antimetabolites.

Authors:  Ryan Montano; Injae Chung; Kristen M Garner; David Parry; Alan Eastman
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Caffeine inhibits the checkpoint kinase ATM.

Authors:  A Blasina; B D Price; G A Turenne; C H McGowan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Minireview: human ovarian cancer: biology, current management, and paths to personalizing therapy.

Authors:  Ignacio Romero; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 5.  Emergence of a DNA-damage response network consisting of Fanconi anaemia and BRCA proteins.

Authors:  Weidong Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Identification of DNA repair pathways that affect the survival of ovarian cancer cells treated with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in a novel drug combination.

Authors:  Amelia M Huehls; Jill M Wagner; Catherine J Huntoon; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Effects of selective checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition on cytarabine cytotoxicity in acute myelogenous leukemia cells in vitro.

Authors:  Erin L Schenk; Brian D Koh; Karen S Flatten; Kevin L Peterson; David Parry; Allan D Hess; B Douglas Smith; Judith E Karp; Larry M Karnitz; Scott H Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  The Mre11 nuclease is critical for the sensitivity of cells to Chk1 inhibition.

Authors:  Ruth Thompson; Ryan Montano; Alan Eastman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Structure-specific DNA endonuclease Mus81/Eme1 generates DNA damage caused by Chk1 inactivation.

Authors:  Josep V Forment; Melanie Blasius; Ilaria Guerini; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  CCT244747 is a novel potent and selective CHK1 inhibitor with oral efficacy alone and in combination with genotoxic anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Mike I Walton; Paul D Eve; Angela Hayes; Melanie R Valenti; Alexis K De Haven Brandon; Gary Box; Albert Hallsworth; Elizabeth L Smith; Kathy J Boxall; Michael Lainchbury; Thomas P Matthews; Yann Jamin; Simon P Robinson; G Wynne Aherne; John C Reader; Louis Chesler; Florence I Raynaud; Suzanne A Eccles; Ian Collins; Michelle D Garrett
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  88 in total

1.  Evaluation of [18F]-ATRi as PET tracer for in vivo imaging of ATR in mouse models of brain cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carlucci; Brandon Carney; Ahmad Sadique; Axel Vansteene; Jun Tang; Thomas Reiner
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  CHK1 and WEE1 inhibition combine synergistically to enhance therapeutic efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia ex vivo.

Authors:  Leena Chaudhuri; Nicole D Vincelette; Brian D Koh; Ryan M Naylor; Karen S Flatten; Kevin L Peterson; Amanda McNally; Ivana Gojo; Judith E Karp; Ruben A Mesa; Lisa O Sproat; James M Bogenberger; Scott H Kaufmann; Raoul Tibes
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Deciphering the BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor Network.

Authors:  Qinqin Jiang; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Development of pharmacodynamic biomarkers for ATR inhibitors.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Fiona K Middleton; Susanna Falcon; Philip M Reaper; John R Pollard; Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Pharmacologic inhibition of ATR and ATM offers clinically important distinctions to enhancing platinum or radiation response in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer cells.

Authors:  Pang-ning Teng; Nicholas W Bateman; Kathleen M Darcy; Chad A Hamilton; George Larry Maxwell; Christopher J Bakkenist; Thomas P Conrads
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  GnRH-R-Targeted Lytic Peptide Sensitizes BRCA Wild-type Ovarian Cancer to PARP Inhibition.

Authors:  Shaolin Ma; Sunila Pradeep; Alejandro Villar-Prados; Yunfei Wen; Emine Bayraktar; Lingegowda S Mangala; Mark Seungwook Kim; Sherry Y Wu; Wei Hu; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Carola Leuschner; Xiaoyan Liang; Prahlad T Ram; Katharina Schlacher; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  ATR inhibitors VE-821 and VX-970 sensitize cancer cells to topoisomerase i inhibitors by disabling DNA replication initiation and fork elongation responses.

Authors:  Rozenn Jossé; Scott E Martin; Rajarshi Guha; Pinar Ormanoglu; Thomas D Pfister; Philip M Reaper; Christopher S Barnes; Julie Jones; Peter Charlton; John R Pollard; Joel Morris; James H Doroshow; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Restored replication fork stabilization, a mechanism of PARP inhibitor resistance, can be overcome by cell cycle checkpoint inhibition.

Authors:  Brittany Haynes; Junko Murai; Jung-Min Lee
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  Depletion of ATR selectively sensitizes ATM-deficient human mammary epithelial cells to ionizing radiation and DNA-damaging agents.

Authors:  Yuxia Cui; Stela S Palii; Cynthia L Innes; Richard S Paules
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Ovarian cancer-associated mutations disable catalytic activity of CDK12, a kinase that promotes homologous recombination repair and resistance to cisplatin and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.

Authors:  Poorval M Joshi; Shari L Sutor; Catherine J Huntoon; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.