AIM OF STUDY: To develop an early warning score (EWS) system based on the statistical properties of the vital signs in at-risk hospitalised patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A large dataset comprising 64,622 h of vital-sign data, acquired from 863 acutely ill in-hospital patients using bedside monitors, was used to investigate the statistical properties of the four main vital signs. Normalised histograms and cumulative distribution functions were plotted for each of the four variables. A centile-based alerting system was modelled using the aggregated database. RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of our population's vital signs are very similar to those published in previous studies. When compared with EWS systems based on a future outcome, the cut-off values in our system are most different for respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure. With four-hourly observations in a 12-h shift, about 1 in 8 at-risk patients would trigger our alerting system during the shift. CONCLUSIONS: A centile-based EWS system will identify patients with abnormal vital signs regardless of their eventual outcome and might therefore be more likely to generate an alert when presented with patients with redeemable morbidity or avoidable mortality. We are about to start a stepped-wedge clinical trial gradually introducing an electronic version of our EWS system on the trauma wards in a teaching hospital.
AIM OF STUDY: To develop an early warning score (EWS) system based on the statistical properties of the vital signs in at-risk hospitalised patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A large dataset comprising 64,622 h of vital-sign data, acquired from 863 acutely ill in-hospital patients using bedside monitors, was used to investigate the statistical properties of the four main vital signs. Normalised histograms and cumulative distribution functions were plotted for each of the four variables. A centile-based alerting system was modelled using the aggregated database. RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of our population's vital signs are very similar to those published in previous studies. When compared with EWS systems based on a future outcome, the cut-off values in our system are most different for respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure. With four-hourly observations in a 12-h shift, about 1 in 8 at-risk patients would trigger our alerting system during the shift. CONCLUSIONS: A centile-based EWS system will identify patients with abnormal vital signs regardless of their eventual outcome and might therefore be more likely to generate an alert when presented with patients with redeemable morbidity or avoidable mortality. We are about to start a stepped-wedge clinical trial gradually introducing an electronic version of our EWS system on the trauma wards in a teaching hospital.
Authors: Niels Egholm Pedersen; Lars Simon Rasmussen; John Asger Petersen; Thomas Alexander Gerds; Doris Østergaard; Anne Lippert Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2017-02-25 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: B Alex Dummett; Carmen Adams; Elizabeth Scruth; Vincent Liu; Margaret Guo; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Christopher P Bonafide; Patrick W Brady; Ron Keren; Patrick H Conway; Keith Marsolo; Carrie Daymont Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Marco A F Pimentel; David A Clifton; Lei Clifton; Peter J Watkinson; Lionel Tarassenko Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: David Wong; Timothy Bonnici; Julia Knight; Stephen Gerry; James Turton; Peter Watkinson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Marco A F Pimentel; Alistair E W Johnson; Peter H Charlton; Drew Birrenkott; Peter J Watkinson; Lionel Tarassenko; David A Clifton Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Marco A F Pimentel; Oliver C Redfern; James Malycha; Paul Meredith; David Prytherch; Jim Briggs; J Duncan Young; David A Clifton; Lionel Tarassenko; Peter J Watkinson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405