Literature DB >> 21481961

A case-control study of risk factors for equine influenza spread onto horse premises during the 2007 epidemic in Australia.

Simon M Firestone1, Kathrin A Schemann, Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio, Michael P Ward, Navneet K Dhand.   

Abstract

The 2007 epidemic of equine influenza in Australia provided an opportunity to investigate the effectiveness of on-farm biosecurity measures in preventing the spread of a novel pathogen in a largely naive population. We conducted a case-control study of 200 horse premises from highly affected regions of the state of New South Wales (NSW), to investigate risk factors for the spread of equine influenza onto horse premises, specifically, non-compliance with biosecurity measures recommended to horse owners by the relevant animal health authority, the NSW Department of Primary Industries. The study was restricted to cases occurring during the first seven weeks of the epidemic, a period prior to vaccination and the relaxation of some movement restrictions. Case and control premises were selected from a laboratory testing dataset and interviews were conducted with horse owners and managers on premises between July and November 2009. The proximity of premises to the nearest infected premises was the factor most strongly associated with case status. Case premises were more likely than control premises to be within 5 km and beyond 10 km of an infected premises. Having a footbath in place on the premises before any horses were infected was associated with a nearly four-fold reduction in odds of infection (odds ratio=0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.09, 0.83). This protective association may have reflected overall premises biosecurity standards related to the fomite transmission of equine influenza. Compliance with certain on-farm biosecurity practices seemingly prevented horses on premises in high risk areas being infected with equine influenza during the 2007 outbreak in Australia. In future outbreaks, in addition to broader disease control measures, on-farm biosecurity practices should be adopted by horse owners and managers to prevent equine influenza spread.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481961     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  6 in total

1.  Using a computer simulation model to examine the impact of biosecurity measures during a facility-level outbreak of equine influenza.

Authors:  Kelsey L Spence; Terri L O'Sullivan; Zvonimir Poljak; Amy L Greer
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  The influence of meteorology on the spread of influenza: survival analysis of an equine influenza (A/H3N8) outbreak.

Authors:  Simon M Firestone; Naomi Cogger; Michael P Ward; Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio; Barbara J Moloney; Navneet K Dhand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Perceptions of vulnerability to a future outbreak: a study of horse managers affected by the first Australian equine influenza outbreak.

Authors:  Kathrin Schemann; Simon M Firestone; Melanie R Taylor; Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio; Michael P Ward; Navneet K Dhand
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Adding the spatial dimension to the social network analysis of an epidemic: investigation of the 2007 outbreak of equine influenza in Australia.

Authors:  Simon M Firestone; Robert M Christley; Michael P Ward; Navneet K Dhand
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Recent Advances in Equine Influenza Vaccination.

Authors:  Romain Paillot
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2014-11-14

6.  Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.

Authors:  Karin Kuster; Marie-Eve Cousin; Thomas Jemmi; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.