Literature DB >> 21481778

A multidomain flexible docking approach to deal with large conformational changes in the modeling of biomolecular complexes.

Ezgi Karaca1, Alexandre M J J Bonvin.   

Abstract

Binding-induced backbone and large-scale conformational changes represent one of the major challenges in the modeling of biomolecular complexes by docking. To address this challenge, we have developed a flexible multidomain docking protocol that follows a "divide-and-conquer" approach to model both large-scale domain motions and small- to medium-scale interfacial rearrangements: the flexible binding partner is treated as an assembly of subparts/domains that are docked simultaneously making use of HADDOCK's multidomain docking ability. For this, the flexible molecules are cut at hinge regions predicted using an elastic network model. The performance of this approach is demonstrated on a benchmark covering an unprecedented range of conformational changes of 1.5 to 19.5 Å. We show from a statistical survey of known complexes that the cumulative sum of eigenvalues obtained from the elastic network has some predictive power to indicate the extent of the conformational change to be expected.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481778     DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  22 in total

1.  Cryo-EM Data Are Superior to Contact and Interface Information in Integrative Modeling.

Authors:  Sjoerd J de Vries; Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne; Christina E M Schindler; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Multidomain Assembler (MDA) Generates Models of Large Multidomain Proteins.

Authors:  Samuel Hertig; Thomas D Goddard; Graham T Johnson; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  M3: an integrative framework for structure determination of molecular machines.

Authors:  Ezgi Karaca; João P G L M Rodrigues; Andrea Graziadei; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Teresa Carlomagno
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Free energy calculations offer insights into the influence of receptor flexibility on ligand-receptor binding affinities.

Authors:  Jožica Dolenc; Sereina Riniker; Roberto Gaspari; Xavier Daura; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  ClustENM: ENM-Based Sampling of Essential Conformational Space at Full Atomic Resolution.

Authors:  Zeynep Kurkcuoglu; Ivet Bahar; Pemra Doruker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Challenges in structural approaches to cell modeling.

Authors:  Wonpil Im; Jie Liang; Arthur Olson; Huan-Xiang Zhou; Sandor Vajda; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Computational prediction of protein interfaces: A review of data driven methods.

Authors:  Li C Xue; Drena Dobbs; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Vasant Honavar
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  The solution structure of the kallikrein-related peptidases inhibitor SPINK6.

Authors:  Sascha Jung; Jan Fischer; Björn Spudy; Tim Kerkow; Frank D Sönnichsen; Li Xue; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Peter Goettig; Viktor Magdolen; Ulf Meyer-Hoffert; Joachim Grötzinger
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  A unified conformational selection and induced fit approach to protein-peptide docking.

Authors:  Mikael Trellet; Adrien S J Melquiond; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.