Literature DB >> 21481178

A new microparticle size calibration standard for use in measuring smaller microparticles using a new flow cytometer.

W L Chandler1, W Yeung, J F Tait.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microparticle size measurements are often calibrated on flow cytometers using polystyrene microspheres that forward scatter more light vs. particle diameter than cellular microparticles.
METHODS: We compared theoretical with measured forward angle light scattering on the LSRII, FC500 and Apogee A40 using polystyrene and silica microspheres vs. synthetic lipid vesicles and platelets, then compared plasma microparticle counts using different calibration strategies.
RESULTS: Polystyrene and silica microspheres with higher refractive indices forward scattered more light with a wavelength of 488 nm for a given size microparticle than did lipid vesicles or platelets. The LSRII and FC500 did not count many, and were unable to separate by size, polystyrene microspheres <0.5 μm in diameter. On the Apogee A40, polystyrene microspheres could be separated by size down to 0.2 μm, and a polystyrene microsphere 0.4 μm in diameter produced the same forward scatter relative intensity as a 1-μm lipid or cellular microparticle. Using the new calibrator, the Apogee A40 found 80 000-4 000 000 μL(-1) total microparticles, 11 000-350 000 μL(-1) annexin V positive microparticles and 6000-350 000 μL(-1) platelet microparticles <1 μm in plasma samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The Apogee A40 was able to resolve size differences in polystyrene microspheres down to 0.2 μm and microparticles down to 0.4 μm. On the Apogee A40 we propose using a 0.4-μm polystyrene microsphere as equivalent to a 1-μm cellular microparticle for size calibration. Using this calibrator, the Apogee A40 detected higher numbers of total, platelet and annexin V positive microparticles than were found using a Megamix gate.
© 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481178     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04283.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  83 in total

1.  Methodology for isolation, identification and characterization of microvesicles in peripheral blood.

Authors:  Muthuvel Jayachandran; Virginia M Miller; John A Heit; Whyte G Owen
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Fluorescent labeling of nano-sized vesicles released by cells and subsequent quantitative and qualitative analysis by high-resolution flow cytometry.

Authors:  Els J van der Vlist; Esther N M Nolte-'t Hoen; Willem Stoorvogel; Ger J A Arkesteijn; Marca H M Wauben
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Exosomes from red blood cell units bind to monocytes and induce proinflammatory cytokines, boosting T-cell responses in vitro.

Authors:  Ali Danesh; Heather C Inglis; Rachael P Jackman; Shiquan Wu; Xutao Deng; Marcus O Muench; John W Heitman; Philip J Norris
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Differential contributions of monocyte- and platelet-derived microparticles towards thrombin generation and fibrin formation and stability.

Authors:  M M Aleman; C Gardiner; P Harrison; A S Wolberg
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 5.  Extracellular vesicles such as prostate cancer cell fragments as a fluid biopsy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  S I Brett; Y Kim; C N Biggs; J L Chin; H S Leong
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 6.  Microparticle analysis in disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis.

Authors:  Micah J Mooberry; Nigel S Key
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.355

7.  A trigger channel threshold artifact in nanoparticle analysis.

Authors:  John P Nolan; Samuel A Stoner
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 8.  Circulating membrane-derived microvesicles in redox biology.

Authors:  Michael Craig Larson; Cheryl A Hillery; Neil Hogg
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 9.  Quantification of Exosomes.

Authors:  Erik H Koritzinsky; Jonathan M Street; Robert A Star; Peter S T Yuen
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 10.  Extracellular Vesicles in Renal Diseases: More than Novel Biomarkers?

Authors:  Uta Erdbrügger; Thu H Le
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.