Literature DB >> 21480079

Do common systems control eye movements and motion extrapolation?

Alexis D J Makin1, Ellen Poliakoff.   

Abstract

People are able to judge the current position of occluded moving objects. This operation is known as motion extrapolation. It has previously been suggested that motion extrapolation is independent of the oculomotor system. Here we revisited this question by measuring eye position while participants completed two types of motion extrapolation task. In one task, a moving visual target travelled rightwards, disappeared, then reappeared further along its trajectory. Participants discriminated correct reappearance times from incorrect (too early or too late) with a two-alternative forced-choice button press. In the second task, the target travelled rightwards behind a visible, rectangular occluder, and participants pressed a button at the time when they judged it should reappear. In both tasks, performance was significantly different under fixation as compared to free eye movement conditions. When eye movements were permitted, eye movements during occlusion were related to participants' judgements. Finally, even when participants were required to fixate, small changes in eye position around fixation (<2°) were influenced by occluded target motion. These results all indicate that overlapping systems control eye movements and judgements on motion extrapolation tasks. This has implications for understanding the mechanism underlying motion extrapolation.
© 2011 The Experimental Psychology Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480079     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.548562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  13 in total

1.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of concurrent hand movement on estimated time to contact in a prediction motion task.

Authors:  Ran Zheng; Brian K V Maraj
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; François Maquestiaux; Patricia R DeLucia; Alexis Defer; Elise Prigent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping occluded targets: investigating the influence of target visibility, allocentric cue presence, and direction of motion on gaze and grasp accuracy.

Authors:  Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of auditory rhythms on the speed of inferred motion.

Authors:  Timothy B Patrick; Richard B Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 6.  The common rate control account of prediction motion.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

7.  Illusory speed is retained in memory during invisible motion.

Authors:  Luca Battaglini; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-22

8.  Covert tracking: a combined ERP and fixational eye movement study.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin; Ellen Poliakoff; Rochelle Ackerley; Wael El-Deredy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Coincidence Anticipation Timing Responses with Head Tracking and Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Erin Ross; Micah Kinney; Nick Fogt
Journal:  Aerosp Med Hum Perform       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.051

10.  Is acceleration used for ocular pursuit and spatial estimation during prediction motion?

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.