Literature DB >> 19580724

Risk stratification by adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with coronary artery stenoses of intermediate angiographic severity.

Christina Doesch1, Achim Seeger, Jörg Doering, Christian Herdeg, Christof Burgstahler, Claus D Claussen, Meinrad Gawaz, Stephan Miller, Andreas E May.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for risk stratification in patients with coronary artery stenoses of intermediate angiographic severity.
BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography only provides a morphological description of coronary lesions. As the patient's prognosis is closely related to the functional significance of angiographically detected coronary lesions, a functional assessment is desirable in patients with coronary artery stenoses of intermediate severity.
METHODS: Myocardial perfusion measurements at rest and adenosine stress were performed on 81 patients (75.6% male, mean age 64.2 years) with stable angina pectoris (AP) and coronary artery stenoses of intermediate angiographic severity (50% to 75%). Regardless of the CMR result, all patients were treated conservatively with an intensified medical treatment, and a follow-up was performed after 18 +/- 8 months and 30 +/- 8 months. The primary end point was defined as a major adverse cardiac event (MACE): all-cause death, stroke, acute coronary syndrome; the secondary end point was defined as target vessel revascularization. Furthermore, AP and dyspnea were evaluated.
RESULTS: After the follow-up period of 30 +/- 8 months, 9 patients with perfusion deficit (PD) suffered from MACE, whereas no MACE occurred among the 36 patients without PD (p = 0.014). Among patients who had MACE, the number of ischemic segments (2.3 +/- 1.6 vs. 1.4 +/- 1.6, p = 0.0025) was significantly higher, whereas the number of delayed enhancement segments did not differ (1.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 2.3, p = 0.4). Target vessel revascularization was required in 38% of patients with PD and 6% of patients without PD (p = 0.005). In addition, the percentage of freedom from AP and dyspnea at the follow-up after 18 +/- 8 months was significantly lower among patients without perfusion deficit (69.4% vs. 15.6%; p = 0.0001). After a follow-up period of 30 +/- 8 months, the rate of AP (11.1% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.33) as well as the percentage of patients free of symptoms was similar in both groups (77.8% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.82).
CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine stress CMR may help to identify patients at risk who benefit from intensified medical treatment and close follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19580724     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  The elusive role of myocardial perfusion imaging in stable ischemic heart disease: Is ISCHEMIA the answer?

Authors:  Joe X Xie; David E Winchester; Lawrence M Phillips; Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli; Todd D Miller; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Contribution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sophie Mavrogeni; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Genovefa Kolovou
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-26

Review 4.  Identification of left ventricular myocardial ischemia and cardiac prognosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: updates from 2008 to 2010.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christina Doesch; Theano Papavassiliu
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  Prognostic value of combined magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging and late gadolinium enhancement.

Authors:  Rungroj Krittayaphong; Vithaya Chaithiraphan; Adisak Maneesai; Suthipol Udompanturak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Mapping contrast agent uptake and retention in MRI studies of myocardial perfusion: case control study of dogs with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Anna Naumova; Rainer Storb; Stephen J Tapscott; Zejing Wang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design.

Authors:  David J Maron; Judith S Hochman; Sean M O'Brien; Harmony R Reynolds; William E Boden; Gregg W Stone; Sripal Bangalore; John A Spertus; Daniel B Mark; Karen P Alexander; Leslee Shaw; Jeffrey S Berger; T Bruce Ferguson; David O Williams; Robert A Harrington; Yves Rosenberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Courtney M McVey; Jeffrey S Berger; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  The emerging role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of Kawasaki disease.

Authors:  Sophie Mavrogeni; George Papadopoulos; Tarique Hussain; Amedeo Chiribiri; Rene Botnar; Gerald F Greil
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.