BACKGROUND: The objective was to demonstrate feasibility and therapeutic efficacy of routine clinical use of the bendamustine/rituximab combination in lymphoproliferative diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 71 patients treated with bendamustine/rituximab combination in Tyrol/Austria. Toxicities, therapeutic response, and survival outcome in the various lymphoma entities were analyzed. RESULTS: There was considerable hematotoxicity, with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 in 33% and 18%, respectively. Interestingly, severe infection of grade 3 or 4 was observed in a remarkable percentage of patients with aggressive lymphoma and CLL (21% and 28%, respectively) but not in indolent lymphoma (p = 0.027). Overall, the therapeutic efficacy of bendamustine/rituximab was encouraging. In CLL, an overall response rate (ORR) of 65% was achieved. Notably, in the seven previously untreated CLL patients, ORR was 86%. The therapy was effective across all FISH-cytogenetic subgroups, except for the five patients harboring 17p deletion with unfavorable prognosis (PFS 2.7 months, OS 9.3 months). In indolent lymphoma (n = 25), the bendamustine-rituximab combination induced a remarkable therapeutic effect (ORR 96%, median PFS and OS not reached). In aggressive lymphoma (n = 20), ORR was 50%; in International Prognostic Index high-risk patients (4 or 5 risk factors, n = 10), ORR was only 20%, significantly inferior than in low/intermediate risk patients (ORR 70%; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In the routine setting aside clinical studies, bendamustine/rituximab therapy resulted in marked clinical responses, especially in CLL and indolent lymphoma. In aggressive lymphoma, the combination of bendamustine and rituximab was effective in favorable risk patients.
BACKGROUND: The objective was to demonstrate feasibility and therapeutic efficacy of routine clinical use of the bendamustine/rituximab combination in lymphoproliferative diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 71 patients treated with bendamustine/rituximab combination in Tyrol/Austria. Toxicities, therapeutic response, and survival outcome in the various lymphoma entities were analyzed. RESULTS: There was considerable hematotoxicity, with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 in 33% and 18%, respectively. Interestingly, severe infection of grade 3 or 4 was observed in a remarkable percentage of patients with aggressive lymphoma and CLL (21% and 28%, respectively) but not in indolent lymphoma (p = 0.027). Overall, the therapeutic efficacy of bendamustine/rituximab was encouraging. In CLL, an overall response rate (ORR) of 65% was achieved. Notably, in the seven previously untreated CLLpatients, ORR was 86%. The therapy was effective across all FISH-cytogenetic subgroups, except for the five patients harboring 17p deletion with unfavorable prognosis (PFS 2.7 months, OS 9.3 months). In indolent lymphoma (n = 25), the bendamustine-rituximab combination induced a remarkable therapeutic effect (ORR 96%, median PFS and OS not reached). In aggressive lymphoma (n = 20), ORR was 50%; in International Prognostic Index high-risk patients (4 or 5 risk factors, n = 10), ORR was only 20%, significantly inferior than in low/intermediate risk patients (ORR 70%; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In the routine setting aside clinical studies, bendamustine/rituximab therapy resulted in marked clinical responses, especially in CLL and indolent lymphoma. In aggressive lymphoma, the combination of bendamustine and rituximab was effective in favorable risk patients.
Authors: Daniel Heintel; Cathrin Skrabs; Alexander Hauswirth; Karin Eigenberger; Christine Einberger; Markus Raderer; Wolfgang R Sperr; Paul Knöbl; Leonhard Müllauer; Martin Uffmann; Karin Dieckmann; Alexander Gaiger; Ulrich Jäger Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laurie H Sehn; Jane Donaldson; Mukesh Chhanabhai; Catherine Fitzgerald; Karamjit Gill; Richard Klasa; Nicol MacPherson; Susan O'Reilly; John J Spinelli; Judy Sutherland; Kenneth S Wilson; Randy D Gascoyne; Joseph M Connors Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-06-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K Sue Robinson; Michael E Williams; Richard H van der Jagt; Philip Cohen; Jordan A Herst; Anil Tulpule; Lee S Schwartzberg; Bernard Lemieux; Bruce D Cheson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Hallek; Bruce D Cheson; Daniel Catovsky; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Hillmen; Michael J Keating; Emili Montserrat; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps Journal: Blood Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Brad S Kahl; Nancy L Bartlett; John P Leonard; Ling Chen; Kristen Ganjoo; Michael E Williams; Myron S Czuczman; K Sue Robinson; Robin Joyce; Richard H van der Jagt; Bruce D Cheson Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Wolfgang U Knauf; Toshko Lissichkov; Ali Aldaoud; Anna Liberati; Javier Loscertales; Raoul Herbrecht; Gunnar Juliusson; Gerhard Postner; Liana Gercheva; Stefan Goranov; Martin Becker; Hans-Joerg Fricke; Francoise Huguet; Ilaria Del Giudice; Peter Klein; Lothar Tremmel; Karlheinz Merkle; Marco Montillo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jonathan W Friedberg; Philip Cohen; Ling Chen; K Sue Robinson; Andres Forero-Torres; Ann S La Casce; Luis E Fayad; Alberto Bessudo; Elber S Camacho; Michael E Williams; Richard H van der Jagt; Jennifer W Oliver; Bruce D Cheson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 44.544