PURPOSE: This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of bendamustine and chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with advanced (Binet stage B or C) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (<or= 75 years of age) were randomly assigned to receive bendamustine 100 mg/m(2)/d intravenously on days 1 to 2, or chlorambucil 0.8 mg/kg (Broca's normal weight) orally on days 1 and 15; treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The response to treatment was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Working Group criteria, and the final determination of response was made by a blinded independent review committee. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were randomly assigned (162 bendamustine, 157 chlorambucil). Complete or partial responses were achieved in 110 (68%) of 162 bendamustine-treated and 48 (31%) of 157 chlorambucil-treated patients (P < .0001). More patients showed complete responses with bendamustine than with chlorambucil (31% v 2%). Median progression-free survival was 21.6 months with bendamustine and 8.3 months with chlorambucil (P < .0001). Bendamustine was also associated with an improvement in duration of remission, compared with chlorambucil (median, 21.8 v 8.0 months). Hematologic National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more common with bendamustine than with chlorambucil (occurring in 40% v 19% of patients). Severe infections (grade 3 to 4) occurred in 8% of bendamustine-treated patients and 3% of chlorambucil-treated patients. CONCLUSION:Bendamustine offers significantly greater efficacy than chlorambucil, and a manageable toxicity profile, when used as first-line therapy in patients with advanced CLL.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of bendamustine and chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with advanced (Binet stage B or C) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (<or= 75 years of age) were randomly assigned to receive bendamustine 100 mg/m(2)/d intravenously on days 1 to 2, or chlorambucil 0.8 mg/kg (Broca's normal weight) orally on days 1 and 15; treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The response to treatment was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Working Group criteria, and the final determination of response was made by a blinded independent review committee. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were randomly assigned (162 bendamustine, 157 chlorambucil). Complete or partial responses were achieved in 110 (68%) of 162 bendamustine-treated and 48 (31%) of 157 chlorambucil-treated patients (P < .0001). More patients showed complete responses with bendamustine than with chlorambucil (31% v 2%). Median progression-free survival was 21.6 months with bendamustine and 8.3 months with chlorambucil (P < .0001). Bendamustine was also associated with an improvement in duration of remission, compared with chlorambucil (median, 21.8 v 8.0 months). Hematologic National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more common with bendamustine than with chlorambucil (occurring in 40% v 19% of patients). Severe infections (grade 3 to 4) occurred in 8% of bendamustine-treated patients and 3% of chlorambucil-treated patients. CONCLUSION:Bendamustine offers significantly greater efficacy than chlorambucil, and a manageable toxicity profile, when used as first-line therapy in patients with advanced CLL.
Authors: Thorsten Zenz; John G Gribben; Michael Hallek; Hartmut Döhner; Michael J Keating; Stephan Stilgenbauer Journal: Blood Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Neil E Kay; Kari G Rabe; David J Inwards; Clive S Zent; Jose F Leis; Susan M Schwager; Carrie A Thompson; Deborah A Bowen; Thomas E Witzig; Susan L Slager; Timothy G Call Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert L Dilley; Weijie Poh; Douglas E Gladstone; James G Herman; Margaret M Showel; Judith E Karp; Michael A McDevitt; Keith W Pratz Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Jennifer R Brown; Susan O'Brien; C Daniel Kingsley; Herbert Eradat; John M Pagel; James Lymp; Jamie Hirata; Thomas J Kipps Journal: Blood Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Wolfram Pönisch; Barbara Moll; Malvina Bourgeois; Marc Andrea; Thomas Schliwa; Simone Heyn; Marion Schmalfeld; Thomas Edelmann; Cornelia Becker; Franz Albert Hoffmann; Andreas Schwarzer; Ute Kreibich; Matthias Egert; Runa Stiegler; Rainer Krahl; Yvonne Remane; Anette Bachmann; Tom Lindner; Lorenz Weidhase; Sirak Petros; Stefan Fricke; Vladan Vucinic; Haifa Al Ali; Dietger Niederwieser Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 4.553