Literature DB >> 21478813

Cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning exhibits a signaling pattern different from local ischemic preconditioning.

Nicole M Heinen1, Verena E Pütz, Jessica I Görgens, Ragnar Huhn, Yvonne Grüber, Carmen Barthuber, Benedikt Preckel, Benedikt H Pannen, Inge Bauer.   

Abstract

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and local ischemic preconditioning (IPC) protect the myocardium from subsequent ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. In this study, the protective effects of early RIPC, IPC, and the combination of both (RIPC-IPC) were characterized. Furthermore, the hypothesis was tested that protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), important mediators of IPC, are activated in RIPC. Infarct size, serum troponin T, and creatine kinase levels were assessed after 4 × 5-min noninvasive RIPC, local IPC, or a combination of both and 35 min of regional ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Protein kinase C ε and the MAPKs extracellular signal-regulated MAPK (ERK), c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 MAPK were analyzed by Western blot analysis and activity assays in the myocardium and skeletal muscle immediately after the preconditioning protocol. Remote ischemic preconditioning, IPC, and RIPC-IPC significantly reduced myocardial infarct size (RIPC-I/R: 54% ± 15%; IPC-I/R: 33% ± 15%; RIPC-IPC-I/R: 33% ± 15%; P < 0.05 vs. I/R [76% ± 14%]) and troponin T release (RIPC-I/R: 15.4 ± 6.4 ng/mL; IPC-I/R: 10.9 ± 7.0 ng/mL; RIPC-IPC-I/R: 9.8 ± 5.6 ng/mL; P < 0.05 vs. I/R [27.1 ± 12.0 ng/mL]) after myocardial I/R. Ischemic preconditioning led to an activation of PKCε and ERK 1/2, whereas RIPC did not lead to a translocation of PKCε to the mitochondria or phosphorylation of the MAPKs ERK 1/2, JNK 1/2, and p38 MAPK. Remote ischemic preconditioning did not induce translocation of PKCε to the mitochondria or phosphorylation of MAPKs in the preconditioned muscle tissue. Remote ischemic preconditioning, IPC, and RIPC-IPC exert early protection against myocardial I/R injury. Remote ischemic preconditioning and local IPC exhibit different activation dynamics of signal transducers in the myocardium. The studied PKC-MAPK pathway is likely not involved in the protective effects of RIPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21478813     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31821d8e77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  11 in total

1.  Impact of O-GlcNAc on cardioprotection by remote ischaemic preconditioning in non-diabetic and diabetic patients.

Authors:  Rebekka V Jensen; Natasha E Zachara; Per H Nielsen; Hans Henrik Kimose; Steen B Kristiansen; Hans Erik Bøtker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Remote vs. local ischaemic preconditioning in the rat heart: infarct limitation, suppression of ischaemic arrhythmia and the role of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Michael M Galagudza; Dmitry L Sonin; Timur D Vlasov; Dmitry I Kurapeev; Eugene V Shlyakhto
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  STAT5 fits the RISK profile for cardioprotection.

Authors:  Sean M Davidson; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  JAKSTAT       Date:  2012-04-01

4.  A cardiopulmonary bypass with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest rat model for the investigation of the systemic inflammation response and induced organ damage.

Authors:  Melanie Engels; Esra Bilgic; Antonio Pinto; Edwin Vasquez; Lena Wollschläger; Holger Steinbrenner; Kristine Kellermann; Payam Akhyari; Artur Lichtenberg; Udo Boeken
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Remote ischemic preconditioning preserves Connexin 43 phosphorylation in the rat heart in vivo.

Authors:  Timo Brandenburger; Ragnar Huhn; Andreas Galas; Benedikt H Pannen; Verena Keitel; Franziska Barthel; Inge Bauer; André Heinen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Kinetics and Signal Activation Properties of Circulating Factor(s) From Healthy Volunteers Undergoing Remote Ischemic Pre-Conditioning.

Authors:  Heike A Hildebrandt; Vincent Kreienkamp; Sabine Gent; Philipp Kahlert; Gerd Heusch; Petra Kleinbongard
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2016-02-13

7.  Remote Ischemic Conditioning by Effluent Collected from a Novel Isolated Hindlimb Model Reduces Infarct Size in an Isolated Heart Model.

Authors:  Young Jin Youn; Byung-Su Yoo; Jung-Woo Son; Jun-Won Lee; Min-Soo Ahn; Sung Gyun Ahn; Jang-Young Kim; Seung-Hwan Lee; Junghan Yoon; Young Woo Eom; Ji-Eun Oh; Seong-Kyung Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Remote liver ischemic preconditioning attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Authors:  Xinhao Liu; Hui Chen; Zhibing Yan; Lei Du; Dou Huang; Wei Dong Gao; Zhaoyang Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of cardioprotection.

Authors:  Andrey Gourine; Alexander V Gourine
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-03

10.  MiR-21-5p but not miR-1-3p expression is modulated by preconditioning in a rat model of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Annika Raupach; Carolin Torregroza; Julia Niestegge; Katharina Feige; Swantje Klemm-Meyer; Inge Bauer; Timo Brandenburger; Hilbert Grievink; André Heinen; Ragnar Huhn
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.