Literature DB >> 21478319

Stochasticity of bacterial attachment and its predictability by the extended derjaguin-landau-verwey-overbeek theory.

Teck Wah R Chia1, Vu Tuan Nguyen, Thomas McMeekin, Narelle Fegan, Gary A Dykes.   

Abstract

Bacterial attachment onto materials has been suggested to be stochastic by some authors but nonstochastic and based on surface properties by others. We investigated this by attaching pairwise combinations of two Salmonella enterica serovar Sofia (S. Sofia) strains (with different physicochemical and attachment properties) with one strain each of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. enterica serovar Infantis, or S. enterica serovar Virchow (all with similar physicochemical and attachment abilities) in ratios of 0.428, 1, and 2.333 onto glass, stainless steel, Teflon, and polysulfone. Attached bacterial cells were recovered and counted. If the ratio of attached cells of each Salmonella serovar pair recovered was the same as the initial inoculum ratio, the attachment process was deemed stochastic. Experimental outcomes from the study were compared to those predicted by the extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (XDLVO) theory. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the initial and the attached ratios for serovar pairs containing S. Sofia S1296a for all different ratios were apparent for all materials. For S. Sofia S1635-containing pairs, 7 out of 12 combinations of serovar pairs and materials had attachment ratios not significantly different (P > 0.05) from the initial ratio of 0.428. Five out of 12 and 10 out of 12 samples had attachment ratios not significantly different (P > 0.05) from the initial ratios of 1 and 2.333, respectively. These results demonstrate that bacterial attachment to different materials is likely to be nonstochastic only when the key physicochemical properties of the bacteria were significantly different (P < 0.05) from each other. XDLVO theory could successfully predict the attachment of some individual isolates to particular materials but could not be used to predict the likelihood of stochasticity in pairwise attachment experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21478319      PMCID: PMC3127615          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01415-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  29 in total

Review 1.  Microbial attachment to food and food contact surfaces.

Authors:  J F Frank
Journal:  Adv Food Nutr Res       Date:  2001

2.  Retention of bacteria on a substratum surface with micro-patterned hydrophobicity.

Authors:  R Bos; H C van der Mei; J Gold; H J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 3.  Role of fimbriae as antigens and intestinal colonization factors of Salmonella serovars.

Authors:  A D Humphries; S M Townsend; R A Kingsley; T L Nicholson; R M Tsolis; A J Bäumler
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Bacterial hydrophobicity, an overall parameter for the measurement of adhesion potential to soil particles.

Authors:  T A Stenström
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Relevance of electrokinetic theory for "soft" particles to bacterial cells: implications for bacterial adhesion.

Authors:  Alexis J de Kerchove; Menachem Elimelech
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 3.882

6.  Retention of bacteria on chicken skin after immersion in bacterial suspensions.

Authors:  T A McMeekin; C J Thomas
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1978-12

7.  Assessing bacterial adhesion using DLVO and XDLVO theories and the jet impingement technique.

Authors:  Sonia Bayoudh; Ali Othmane; Laurence Mora; Hafedh Ben Ouada
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 8.  Long-range and short-range mechanisms of hydrophobic attraction and hydrophilic repulsion in specific and aspecific interactions.

Authors:  Carel Jan van Oss
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.137

9.  Hydrophobic interaction in Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis adherence to various denture base resin materials.

Authors:  S Minagi; Y Miyake; K Inagaki; H Tsuru; H Suginaka
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Salmonella Sofia differs from other poultry-associated Salmonella serovars with respect to cell surface hydrophobicity.

Authors:  T W R Chia; N Fegan; T A McMeekin; G A Dykes
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.077

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dual Roles of Capsular Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Photocatalytic Inactivation of Escherichia coli: Comparison of E. coli BW25113 and Isogenic Mutants.

Authors:  Guocheng Huang; Dehua Xia; Taicheng An; Tsz Wai Ng; Ho Yin Yip; Guiying Li; Huijun Zhao; Po Keung Wong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  D-amino acids inhibit initial bacterial adhesion: thermodynamic evidence.

Authors:  Su-Fang Xing; Xue-Fei Sun; Alicia A Taylor; Sharon L Walker; Yi-Fu Wang; Shu-Guang Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Pectin and Xyloglucan Influence the Attachment of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes to Bacterial Cellulose-Derived Plant Cell Wall Models.

Authors:  Michelle S F Tan; Sadequr Rahman; Gary A Dykes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Review of Label-Free Monitoring of Bacteria: From Challenging Practical Applications to Basic Research Perspectives.

Authors:  Beatrix Péter; Eniko Farkas; Sandor Kurunczi; Zoltán Szittner; Szilvia Bősze; Jeremy J Ramsden; Inna Szekacs; Robert Horvath
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Extracellular DNA released by glycine-auxotrophic Staphylococcus epidermidis small colony variant facilitates catheter-related infections.

Authors:  Junlan Liu; Zhen Shen; Jin Tang; Qian Huang; Ying Jian; Yao Liu; Yanan Wang; Xiaowei Ma; Qian Liu; Lei He; Min Li
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-07-22

6.  Bacterial attachment and biofilm formation on surfaces are reduced by small-diameter nanoscale pores: how small is small enough?

Authors:  Guoping Feng; Yifan Cheng; Shu-Yi Wang; Diana A Borca-Tasciuc; Randy W Worobo; Carmen I Moraru
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 7.290

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.