Literature DB >> 21477933

Later outcomes and alpha/beta estimate from hypofractionated conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy versus standard fractionation for localized prostate cancer.

Felix Leborgne1, Jack Fowler, José H Leborgne, Julieta Mezzera.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Now that the follow-up time has exceeded 5 years, an estimate of the α/β ratio can be presented. The additional late outcomes in patients treated with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer using a hypofractionated vs. a standard fractionation regimen are reported from this prospective nonrandomized contemporary comparison. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 114 nonrandomized patients chose hypofractionation delivered in 20 fractions of 3 Gy or 3.15 Gy (mean 3.06 Gy) for localized prostate cancer within a median overall time of 32 days (range, 29-49) using four fractions weekly. A total of 160 comparable patients were contemporarily treated within a median of 55 days (range 49-66). The median follow-up was 66 months (range, 24-95) for the hypofractionated arm and 63 months (range, 36-92) for the standard arm. The percentage of patients in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups was 36%, 46%, and 18% in the hypofractionated arm and 44%, 50%, and 6% in standard arm (2 Gy), respectively.
RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial biochemical absence of disease (prostate-specific antigen nadir + 2 ng/mL) and disease-free survival rate was the same at 89% in both arms, making the α/β calculation unambiguous. The point ratio of α/β was 1.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-5.1 Gy). The 95% confidence interval was determined entirely by the binomial confidence limits in the numbers of patients. Rectal reactions of grade 3 and 4 occurred in 1 of 114 (hypofractionated) and 2 of 160 (standard) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The presented three-dimensional conformal regimen was acceptable, and the α/β value was 1.8, in agreement with other very recent low meta-analyses (reviewed in the "Discussion" section).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21477933     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  29 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor on: A. Siegmann et al. Dose escalation for patients with decreasing PSA during radiotherapy for elevated PSA after radical prostatectomy improves biochemical progression-free survival. Results of a retrospective study. In: Strahlenther Onkol 2011;187:467-72 (No. 8) (DOI 10.1007/s00066-011-2229-3). P. Ghadjar, D. Zwahlen, D.M. Aebersold: Selection bias is not a good reason for dose intensification in patients with PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost by helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer: monoinstitutional report of acute tolerability assessment with different toxicity scales.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ferrera; Gianluca Mortellaro; Mariella Mannino; Giovanni Caminiti; Antonio Spera; Vanessa Figlia; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Gioacchino Di Paola; Rosario Mazzola; Antonio Lo Casto; Filippo Alongi; Maria Pia Pappalardo; Roberto Lagalla
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Challapalli; E Jones; C Harvey; G O Hellawell; S A Mangar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Treatment outcomes with hypofractionated high-dose radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo Arruda Viani; Bruno Tiago Rossi; Elton Suguikawa; Gisele Zuliani; Eduardo Jose Stefano
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-12

5.  Stereotactic radiotherapy for isolated nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Detti; P Bonomo; L Masi; R Doro; S Cipressi; C Iermano; I Bonucci; D Franceschini; L Di Brina; M Bakhi; G Simontacchi; I Meattini; L Livi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Early closure of phase II prospective study on acute and late tolerance of hypofractionated radiotherapy in low-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Katarzyna Behrendt; Elżbieta Nowicka; Marzena Gawkowska-Suwińska; Grzegorz Plewicki; Beata Smolska-Ciszewska; Monika Giglok; Rafał Suwiński; Aleksander Zajusz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-07-15

7.  Reduced radiation tolerance of penile structures associated with dose-escalated hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Andrew M McDonald; Christopher B Baker; Kiran Shekar; Richard A Popple; Grant M Clark; Eddy S Yang; Rojymon Jacob; Robert Y Kim; John B Fiveash
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer in the presence of an overall time factor: bad news, good news, or no news?

Authors:  Ivan R Vogelius; Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Who benefits from hypofractionated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: evidence from meta-analysis.

Authors:  Libin Sun; Linbin Sun; Shimiao Zhu; Yang Zhao; Hui Zhang; Zhiqun Shang; Ning Jiang; Gang Li; Yuanjie Niu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-06

Review 10.  The case for hypofractionation of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Winnifred M Wong; Kent E Wallner
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.