Literature DB >> 21477643

The use of biomarkers in occupational health research, practice, and policy.

P A Schulte1, J E Hauser.   

Abstract

Biomarkers are potentially useful tools for occupational health and safety research, practice, and policy. However, the full realization of this potential has not been achieved. In this paper, the progress made in these three usage areas is reviewed to identify what efforts can be taken to realize the full promise of biomarkers. Biomarker uses are described by a diverse taxonomy that builds on the categories of exposure, effect and susceptibility, and the continuum between exposure and disease prognosis. The most significant uses of biomarkers in occupational health have been in biological monitoring of workers. Other important uses have been in enhancing research and assessing mechanisms of action of occupational toxicants at low exposures. Seven critical areas will influence the extent to which the potential of biomarkers in occupational health and safety is realized. These include: (1) adequate investment in validation; (2) obtaining international agreement on exposure guidelines; (3) exploring the utility of biomarkers in regulation; (4) applying biomarkers to critical occupational safety and health questions; (5) developing the exposome; (6) utilizing biomarkers to address emerging occupational health issues; and (7) continuing to address the ethical and social justice issues related to biomarkers. Overall, if biomarkers are to make a major contribution to occupational health and safety then a more holistic approach to bringing them from the laboratory to practice will be needed. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21477643     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  11 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers of susceptibility: State of the art and implications for occupational exposure to engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Ivo Iavicoli; Veruscka Leso; Paul A Schulte
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  P Schulte; V Leso; M Niang; I Iavicoli
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.372

3.  Cumulative Risk Assessment (CRA): transforming the way we assess health risks.

Authors:  Pamela R D Williams; G Scott Dotson; Andrew Maier
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Assessing the protection of the nanomaterial workforce.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Ivo Iavicoli; Jorma H Rantanen; Dirk Dahmann; Sergio Iavicoli; Rüdiger Pipke; Irina Guseva Canu; Fabio Boccuni; Maximo Ricci; Maria Letizia Polci; Enrico Sabbioni; Antonio Pietroiusti; Elvio Mantovani
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.913

5.  Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust from varying categories of rooms in Changchun city, northeast China.

Authors:  Zucheng Wang; Shengzhong Wang; Jiaqin Nie; Yuanhong Wang; Yuyan Liu
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in indoor dusts of Guizhou, southwest of China: status, sources and potential human health risk.

Authors:  Qin Yang; Huaguo Chen; Baizhan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Biomonitoring as an Underused Exposure Assessment Tool in Occupational Safety and Health Context-Challenges and Way Forward.

Authors:  Susana Viegas; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Nancy B Hopf; Jos Bessems; Nicole Palmen; Karen S Galea; Kate Jones; Peter Kujath; Radu-Corneliu Duca; Hans Verhagen; Tiina Santonen; Robert Pasanen-Kase
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  The Exposome Approach in Allergies and Lung Diseases: Is It Time to Define a Preconception Exposome?

Authors:  Juan Pablo López-Cervantes; Marianne Lønnebotn; Nils Oskar Jogi; Lucia Calciano; Ingrid Nordeide Kuiper; Matthew G Darby; Shyamali C Dharmage; Francisco Gómez-Real; Barbara Hammer; Randi Jacobsen Bertelsen; Ane Johannessen; Anne Mette Lund Würtz; Toril Mørkve Knudsen; Jennifer Koplin; Kathrine Pape; Svein Magne Skulstad; Signe Timm; Gro Tjalvin; Susanne Krauss-Etschmann; Simone Accordini; Vivi Schlünssen; Jorunn Kirkeleit; Cecilie Svanes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Towards a toxic-free environment: perspectives for chemical risk assessment approaches.

Authors:  Matteo Bonzini; Veruscka Leso; Ivo Iavicoli
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 1.275

10.  Considerations for Using Genetic and Epigenetic Information in Occupational Health Risk Assessment and Standard Setting.

Authors:  P A Schulte; C Whittaker; C P Curran
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.