Literature DB >> 21475995

Geometry of thoracolumbar vertebral endplates of the human spine.

Hong Chen1, Dianming Jiang, Yunsheng Ou, Jian Zhong, Fajin Lv.   

Abstract

Novel and better vertebral body replacement constructs are always desired by surgeons. Endplate geometry is crucial for the design of those implants, but current literature on that topic is very scarce. The authors present a morphometric study of thoracolumbar vertebral endplates, the goal of which was to analyze the geometry of endplates from T10 inferior to L3 superior by employing data from CT scans, as well as to verify the reliability of data derived from the CT measurement. Reformatted CT scans of 83 individuals were analyzed and sagittal concave angle, location of concave region, sagittal diameter of endplate, coronal concave angle, as well as transverse diameter of endplate were measured in midsagittal plane and specified coronal plane. The data of CT and cadaveric measurements of ten cadaveric specimens were also compared. Age and gender did not influence sagittal concave angle, location of concave region, and coronal concave angle significantly (P > 0.05). No significant difference has been revealed among each endplate for sagittal concave angle (range 162.5°-163.9°) and location of concave region (range 42.5-44.2%), either. Ranging between 170.9° and 175.7°, coronal concave angle was constantly larger in superior endplate than in inferior one. The sagittal and transverse endplate diameters of females were significantly smaller than those of males (P < 0.05), being about 88% of the latter one. The mean difference between CT and cadaveric measurements was small (Cronbach alpha > 0.8). Those morphologic parameters, especially the concavity of endplates, should be taken into consideration when designing novel vertebral body replacement constructs. CT measurement data could be used to calculate most suitable geometric parameters of those implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21475995      PMCID: PMC3207343          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1787-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  An experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density.

Authors:  K Hasegawa; M Abe; T Washio; T Hara
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Robert Pflugmacher; Philipp Schleicher; Jan Schaefer; Matti Scholz; Kathrin Ludwig; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Norbert P Haas; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Shukor Hashim; Lucas A Wilson; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith; Molly J Diekmann; Julie Trommeter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  In vitro biomechanics of an expandable vertebral body replacement with self-adjusting end plates.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Andrew L Freeman; Brian P Beaubien
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae.

Authors:  J L Berry; J M Moran; W S Berg; A D Steffee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  S D Rockoff; E Sweet; J Bleustein
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1969

7.  Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae--analysis of data from digitised CT images.

Authors:  S H Zhou; I D McCarthy; A H McGregor; R R Coombs; S P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Radiologic stability of titanium mesh cages for anterior spinal reconstruction following thoracolumbar corpectomy.

Authors:  Peter A Robertson; Helen J Rawlinson; Alastair T Hadlow
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-02

Review 9.  Biomechanics of the aging spine.

Authors:  Stephen J Ferguson; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A study of vertebra and disc geometric relations of the human cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  I Gilad; M Nissan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sagittal endplate morphology of the lower lumbar spine.

Authors:  Palaniappan Lakshmanan; Balaji Purushothaman; Vlasta Dvorak; Walter Schratt; Sathya Thambiraj; Maximilian Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.

Authors:  Ruoliang Tang; Celal Gungor; Richard F Sesek; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Sean Gallagher; Gerard A Davis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Jian Zhong; Jixiang Tan; Dandong Wu; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Structural vertebral endplate nomenclature and etiology: a study by the ISSLS Spinal Phenotype Focus Group.

Authors:  Uruj Zehra; Cora Bow; Jeffrey C Lotz; Frances M K Williams; S Rajasekaran; Jaro Karppinen; Keith D K Luk; Michele C Battiê; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yihang Yu; Dale L Robinson; David C Ackland; Yi Yang; Peter Vee Sin Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.