Literature DB >> 2147536

Comparison of thallium-201 and technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile single-photon emission computed tomography for estimating the extent of myocardial ischemia and infarction in coronary artery disease.

K A Narahara1, J Villanueva-Meyer, C J Thompson, M Brizendine, I Mena.   

Abstract

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using thallium-201 (Tl-201) was compared with technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile (Tc-99m MIBI) in 24 patients with coronary artery diseaes. Patients exercised to the same work load as each isotope was studied. Normal and hypoperfused left ventricular mass was determined with an automated method. Estimated total left ventricular mass was similar for both stress/redistribution Tl-201 and stress/rest Tc-99m MIBI images. The mean estimated defect size in the redistribution Tl-201 images was 32 +/- 34.7 vs 33 +/- 38.4 g in the resting Tc-99m MIBI studies (difference not significant). The individual determinations of defect mass were highly correlated (r = 0.93; p less than 0.0001). Estimated defect size in the stress Tl-201 images (52 +/- 46.2 g) was significantly larger than the exercise Tc-99m MIBI estimates of defect mass (42 +/- 39.9 g; p less than 0.05). A linear correlation existed between stress thallium and technetium estimates of defect size (r = 0.85) but 15 of 24 Tc-99m MIBI defects were smaller than the Tl-201 defects. Partial redistribution of Tc-99m MIBI could explain the discordance. Stress Tc-99m MIBI SPECT defect size determined by visual interpretation or by the use of isocount analysis may be smaller than what is seen with stress Tl-201 SPECT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2147536     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90530-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  The challenge of quantifying defect size and severity: reality versus algorithm.

Authors:  R L Eisner; R E Patterson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Assessment of Regional Viability in the Infarct Zone Following Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin as a prognostic agent?

Authors:  Ichiro Matsunari; Junichi Taki; Kenichi Nakajima; Norihisa Tonami
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Dual isotope stress Tl-201 and rest Tc-99m CZT SPECT: Are we truly leveraging CZT technology?

Authors:  Saurabh Malhotra; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  One-year prognosis of patients with normal planar or single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium 99m-labeled sestamibi exercise imaging.

Authors:  K Raiker; A J Sinusas; F J Wackers; B L Zaret
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Comparison of reinjection thallium 201 and resting technetium 99m sestamibi tomographic images for the quantification of infarct size after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T F Christian; M K O'Connor; M R Hopfenspirger; R J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Dipyridamole technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial tomography as an independent predictor of cardiac event-free survival after acute ischemic events.

Authors:  D D Miller; H G Stratmann; L Shaw; B R Tamesis; M D Wittry; L T Younis; B R Chaitman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Automatic assessment of scintmammographic images using a novelty filter.

Authors:  M Costa; L Moura
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

Review 9.  Technetium-labeled myocardial imaging agents.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; J Heo
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

10.  Diagnostic value of stress thallium-201/rest technetium-99m-sestamibi sequential dual isotope high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Gilles Barone-Rochette; Feras Zoreka; Loïc Djaileb; Nicolas Piliero; Alex Calizzano; Jean Louis Quesada; Alexis Broisat; Laurent Riou; Jacques Machecourt; Daniel Fagret; Gerald Vanzetto; Catherine Ghezzi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.952

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.