Literature DB >> 21473921

Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions.

David Pitcher1, Daniel D Dilks, Rebecca R Saxe, Christina Triantafyllou, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have identified multiple face-selective regions in human cortex but the functional division of labor between these regions is not yet clear. A central hypothesis, with some empirical support, is that face-selective regions in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are particularly responsive to dynamic information in faces, whereas the fusiform face area (FFA) computes the static or invariant properties of faces. Here we directly tested this hypothesis by measuring the magnitude of response in each region to both dynamic and static stimuli. Consistent with the hypothesis, we found that the response to movies of faces was not significantly different from the response to static images of faces from these same movies in the right FFA and right occipital face area (OFA). By contrast the face-selective region in the right posterior STS (pSTS) responded nearly three times as strongly to dynamic faces as to static faces, and a face-selective region in the right anterior STS (aSTS) responded to dynamic faces only. Both of these regions also responded more strongly to moving faces than to moving bodies, indicating that they are preferentially engaged in processing dynamic information from faces, not in more general processing of any dynamic social stimuli. The response to dynamic and static faces was not significantly different in a third face-selective region in the posterior continuation of the STS (pcSTS). The strong selectivity of face-selective regions in the pSTS and aSTS, but not the FFA, OFA or pcSTS, for dynamic face information demonstrates a clear functional dissociation between different face-selective regions, and provides further clues into their function.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21473921     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  141 in total

1.  Retinotopy and attention to the face and house images in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Tianyi Yan; Seiichiro Ohno; Susumu Kanazawa; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  FFA and OFA Encode Distinct Types of Face Identity Information.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Katherine Storrs; Adrian Lloyd Williams; Carolyn McGettigan; Lúcia Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind.

Authors:  Daniel Y-J Yang; Gabriela Rosenblau; Cara Keifer; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Large-scale, high-resolution neurophysiological maps underlying FMRI of macaque temporal lobe.

Authors:  Elias B Issa; Alex M Papanastassiou; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A face is more than just the eyes, nose, and mouth: fMRI evidence that face-selective cortex represents external features.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Ethan J Morris; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Directed network discovery with dynamic network modelling.

Authors:  Stefano Anzellotti; Dorit Kliemann; Nir Jacoby; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Andrea Wheeler; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  A computer-generated animated face stimulus set for psychophysiological research.

Authors:  Adam Naples; Alyssa Nguyen-Phuc; Marika Coffman; Anna Kresse; Susan Faja; Raphael Bernier; James C McPartland
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-06

9.  A Flexible Neural Representation of Faces in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Runnan Cao; Xin Li; Alexander Todorov; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-08-28

10.  Cortical responses to dynamic emotional facial expressions generalize across stimuli, and are sensitive to task-relevance, in adults with and without Autism.

Authors:  Dorit Kliemann; Hilary Richardson; Stefano Anzellotti; Dima Ayyash; Amanda J Haskins; John D E Gabrieli; Rebecca R Saxe
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.