Literature DB >> 21472709

Breast cancer recurrence diagnosis suspected on tumor marker rising: value of whole-body 18FDG-PET/CT imaging and impact on patient management.

Laurence Champion1, Etienne Brain, Anne-Laure Giraudet, Elise Le Stanc, Myriam Wartski, Véronique Edeline, Olivier Madar, Dominique Bellet, Alain Pecking, Jean-Louis Alberini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer recurrence is often suspected on tumor marker rising in asymptomatic patients. The value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to detect recurrence and its subsequent impact on patient management were retrospectively assessed.
METHODS: PET/CT scans were performed on 228 asymptomatic patients (mean, 60.8 years; range, 30-91 years) presenting with rising CA 15-3 and/or CEA serum levels.
RESULTS: PET/CT scans were positive in 181 patients (79.5%) and normal in 47 patients, whereas 187 true recurrences were diagnosed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PET/CT imaging for detection of breast cancer recurrence were 93.6%, 85.4%, 96.7%, 74.5%, and 92.1%, respectively. When compared with the standard workup available in 67 patients, PET/CT imaging had a higher sensitivity and accuracy (94.5% vs 33% and 94% vs 48%, respectively). Recurrences were confirmed by pathology, conventional imaging techniques, or radiological and clinical follow-up beyond 1 year (mean, 34 months; range, 12-67 years) in 32, 130, and 25 patients, respectively. The diagnosis of recurrence led to a treatment modification in 123 patients (54%).
CONCLUSIONS: 18FDG-PET/CT imaging is an efficient technique to detect breast cancer recurrence suspected on tumor marker rising in asymptomatic patients. It may thus contribute to improve patient management, providing an earlier diagnosis with complete whole-body staging as a "one-stop shop" procedure.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21472709     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  22 in total

1.  Can FDG PET/CT monitor the response to hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Domenico Rubello; Giorgio Saladini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Assessment of response to endocrine therapy using FDG PET/CT in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nina Mortazavi-Jehanno; Anne-Laure Giraudet; Laurence Champion; Florence Lerebours; Elise Le Stanc; Veronique Edeline; Olivier Madar; Dominique Bellet; Alain Paul Pecking; Jean-Louis Alberini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Pericellular pH homeostasis is a primary function of the Warburg effect: inversion of metabolic systems to control lactate steady state in tumor cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mazzio; Nawal Boukli; Nery Rivera; Karam F A Soliman
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 4.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Iterative reconstruction using a Monte Carlo based system transfer matrix for dedicated breast positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Krishnendu Saha; Kenneth J Straus; Yu Chen; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Koosha Paydary; Siavash Mehdizadeh Seraj; Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Sara Pourhassan Shamchi; Saeid Gholami; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C Riegger; J Herrmann; J Nagarajah; J Hecktor; S Kuemmel; F Otterbach; S Hahn; A Bockisch; T Lauenstein; G Antoch; T A Heusner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  D Groheux; S Giacchetti; M Delord; A de Roquancourt; P Merlet; A S Hamy; M Espié; E Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Is a comparative clinical trial for breast cancer tumor markers to monitor disease recurrence warranted? A value of information analysis.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; Norah Lynn Henry; Scott D Ramsey; David K Blough; Bill Barlow; Julie R Gralow; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.744

10.  Doppler ultrasonography reveals blood flow signals within the masses of invasive moles in subjects with normal hCG levels after chemotherapy: Three case reports.

Authors:  Xi Zhou; Zhao Duan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.