Literature DB >> 21472513

BEYOND KRAS: Other markers and potential treatment strategies for KRAS mutant and wild-type patients.

Andrea Cercek1, Leonard Saltz.   

Abstract

Despite the advances and new drug discoveries, the best drug in metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) is 5-fluorouracil. This drug is the backbone of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI which are the standard first line cytotoxic regimens in the metastatic setting. The efficacies of these two regimens are equivalent, and the selection of one over the other is largely based on the side effect profile. Bevacizumab is commonly added to each of these regimes in the first line setting. When a patient develops progression of disease on FOLFOX, then treatment with either single agent irinotecan, or FOLFIRI is a typical approach. If FOLFIRI-BEV is used in first line, the FOLFOX is typically given in second line. All patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have their tumor tested for the KRAS mutation in exon 2. If the tumor is KRAS wild-type then either cetuximab or panitumumab, with or without continued irinotecan, may be used. In patients whose tumors are symptomatic, and so requiring a rapid response, cetuximab or panitumumab may be incorporated into second line therapy instead of third line. There are no data supporting the use of cetuximab after progression on panitumumab or vice versa and use of one of these agents after failure on the other is not appropriate. Upon progression on the standard chemotherapies outlined above appropriate patients may be offered participation in a clinical trial. For patients whose tumors are KRAS mutant a clinical trial should be considered upon progression on oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based regimens. New agents and combinations of targeted therapies described below offer promising therapies for patients with both KRAS wild type and mutant tumors. As our molecular knowledge of mcrc advances future therapies will likely tailor an individualized approach based on tumor specific molecular markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21472513     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-011-0147-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  21 in total

1.  Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Authors:  Wendy De Roock; Derek J Jonker; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Dongsheng Tu; Salvatore Siena; Simona Lamba; Sabrina Arena; Milo Frattini; Hubert Piessevaux; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris J O'Callaghan; Shirin Khambata-Ford; John R Zalcberg; John Simes; Christos S Karapetis; Alberto Bardelli; Sabine Tejpar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Heterogeneity of receptor function in colon carcinoma cells determined by cross-talk between type I insulin-like growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Yi Peter Hu; Sandip B Patil; Michelle Panasiewicz; Wenhui Li; Jennie Hauser; Lisa E Humphrey; Michael G Brattain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of resistance to therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  E Ramsay Camp; Justin Summy; Todd W Bauer; Wenbiao Liu; Gary E Gallick; Lee M Ellis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Randomized, phase II study of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor IMC-A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Diane Lauren Reidy; Efsevia Vakiani; Marwan G Fakih; Muhammad Wasif Saif; Joel Randolph Hecht; Noah Goodman-Davis; Ellen Hollywood; Jinru Shia; Jonathan Schwartz; Kumari Chandrawansa; Aruna Dontabhaktuni; Hagop Youssoufian; David B Solit; Leonard B Saltz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Multicenter phase II study of the oral MEK inhibitor, CI-1040, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung, breast, colon, and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John Rinehart; Alex A Adjei; Patricia M Lorusso; David Waterhouse; J Randolph Hecht; Ronald B Natale; Oday Hamid; Mary Varterasian; Peggy Asbury; Eric P Kaldjian; Stephen Gulyas; David Y Mitchell; Roman Herrera; Judith S Sebolt-Leopold; Mark B Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.

Authors:  Shirin Khambata-Ford; Christopher R Garrett; Neal J Meropol; Mark Basik; Christopher T Harbison; Shujian Wu; Tai W Wong; Xin Huang; Chris H Takimoto; Andrew K Godwin; Benjamin R Tan; Smitha S Krishnamurthi; Howard A Burris; Elizabeth A Poplin; Manuel Hidalgo; Jose Baselga; Edwin A Clark; David J Mauro
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Epithelial growth factor receptor interacting agents.

Authors:  Jose Baselga; Joan Albanell
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.722

8.  Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Carsten Bokemeyer; Igor Bondarenko; Anatoly Makhson; Joerg T Hartmann; Jorge Aparicio; Filippo de Braud; Serban Donea; Heinz Ludwig; Gunter Schuch; Christopher Stroh; Anja H Loos; Angela Zubel; Piotr Koralewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Loupakis; A Ruzzo; C Cremolini; B Vincenzi; L Salvatore; D Santini; G Masi; I Stasi; E Canestrari; E Rulli; I Floriani; K Bencardino; N Galluccio; V Catalano; G Tonini; M Magnani; G Fontanini; F Basolo; A Falcone; F Graziano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hsp90 inhibitors and drug resistance in cancer: the potential benefits of combination therapies of Hsp90 inhibitors and other anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  Xiangyi Lu; Li Xiao; Luan Wang; Douglas M Ruden
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Polymorphisms in Genes Involved in EGFR Turnover Are Predictive for Cetuximab Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Stintzing; Wu Zhang; Volker Heinemann; Daniel Neureiter; Ralf Kemmerling; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung; Matthias Folwaczny; Dongyun Yang; Yan Ning; Ana Sebio; Stefan Stremitzer; Yu Sunakawa; Satoshi Matsusaka; Shinichi Yamauchi; Fotios Loupakis; Chiara Cremolini; Alfredo Falcone; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 6.261

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.