Literature DB >> 21472434

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.

E H Lips1, L Mulder, J J de Ronde, I A M Mandjes, A Vincent, M T F D Vrancken Peeters, P M Nederlof, J Wesseling, S Rodenhuis.   

Abstract

A pathological complete remission (pCR) is rarely achieved by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2-) tumors. Therefore, its use might be questionable in specific groups of this tumor type. To select which patients benefit and which could be spared neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we tested standard pathology and molecular markers in ER+ HER2- breast tumors. Pretreatment biopsies were available from 211 ER+ HER2- tumors, who had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (adriamycin/cyclophosphamide). mRNA expression data were available for 132 tumors. We determined progesterone receptor expression (PR), endocrine sensitivity, HER2 expression, histology, proliferation, and molecular subtypes. We correlated these data to chemotherapy response using pCR rates and the previously published neoadjuvant response index (NRI). PR-negative tumors (n = 65, 30.8%) and luminal B type tumors (n = 43, 20.4%) responded significantly better to chemotherapy than other tumors. These associations remained significant in multivariate analysis. However, even in the subgroup of patients with the lowest response rate, comprising tumors that had both a positive-PR expression and the luminal A subtype (n = 58, 44%), the majority of the patients had downstaging because of chemotherapy. For histology (lobular vs. ductal), endocrine sensitivity, and proliferation, no associations with chemotherapy response were observed. Gene expression array analysis resulted in 28 significant genes (FDR < 0.1). PR expression and luminal B status are associated with a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, both markers had only weak response predictive power, and it was not possible to identify a subgroup with no or only minimal chemotherapy benefit. Therefore, the decision to refrain from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to ER+ HER2- breast tumors should not be based on predictive markers, but exclusively on estimates of prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21472434     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1488-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  31 in total

1.  Correlation between tumour characteristics, SUV measurements, metabolic tumour volume, TLG and textural features assessed with 18F-FDG PET in a large cohort of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Charles Lemarignier; Antoine Martineau; Luis Teixeira; Laetitia Vercellino; Marc Espié; Pascal Merlet; David Groheux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Breast cancer cells respond differently to docetaxel depending on their phenotype and on survivin upregulation.

Authors:  Francesca De Iuliis; Gerardo Salerno; Anna Giuffrida; Bernardina Milana; Ludovica Taglieri; Giovanna Rubinacci; Sabrina Giantulli; Federica Terella; Ida Silvestri; Susanna Scarpa
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-21

3.  Is Routine Axillary Imaging Necessary in Clinically Node-Negative Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Anita Mamtani; Anne Eaton; Sandra Brennan; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Association of primary tumour FDG uptake with clinical, histopathological and molecular characteristics in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  B B Koolen; M J T F D Vrancken Peeters; J Wesseling; E H Lips; W V Vogel; T S Aukema; E van Werkhoven; K G A Gilhuijs; S Rodenhuis; E J Th Rutgers; R A Valdés Olmos
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prognostic relevance at 5 years of the early monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using (18)F-FDG PET in luminal HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Alexandre Cochet; Mélanie Gauthier; Céline Charon-Barra; Séverine Guiu; Isabelle Desmoulins; Michel Toubeau; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Charles Coutant; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancers: Recent Progress.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Hamed Vavadi; Alex Merkulov; Hai Li; Mohsen Erfanzadeh; Atahar Mostafa; Yanping Gong; Hassan Salehi; Susan Tannenbaum; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Quantitative assessment of effect of preanalytic cold ischemic time on protein expression in breast cancer tissues.

Authors:  Veronique M Neumeister; Valsamo Anagnostou; Summar Siddiqui; Allison Michal England; Elizabeth R Zarrella; Maria Vassilakopoulou; Fabio Parisi; Yuval Kluger; David G Hicks; David L Rimm
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Oriana A Petruolo; Melissa Pilewskie; Sujata Patil; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Hannah Y Wen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Predicting Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6691 Trial of Diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Imaging.

Authors:  Bruce J Tromberg; Zheng Zhang; Anaïs Leproux; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Albert E Cerussi; Philip M Carpenter; Rita S Mehta; Darren Roblyer; Wei Yang; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue; Shudong Jiang; Peter A Kaufman; Arjun G Yodh; So Hyun Chung; Mitchell Schnall; Bradley S Snyder; Nola Hylton; David A Boas; Stefan A Carp; Steven J Isakoff; David Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Strong cytoplasmic expression of NF-κB/p65 correlates with a good prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Motoi Baba; Masato Takahashi; Katsushige Yamashiro; Hideki Yokoo; Moto Fukai; Masanori Sato; Mitsuchika Hosoda; Toshiya Kamiyama; Akinobu Taketomi; Hiroko Yamashita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.