Literature DB >> 21470593

Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry.

Julia Lamparter1, Andreas Schulze, Ann-Christin Schuff, Manfred Berres, Norbert Pfeiffer, Esther M Hoffmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form (FDF) perimetry.
DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred forty-one eyes of 75 healthy subjects were included in the study. Every subject was measured 3 times on 3 different days within 3 months. Differences among the tests were analyzed for mean sensitivity (MS), mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), reliability indices, test duration, and test points <5% and <0.5% in 75 right eyes on the basis of linear mixed models for repeated measurements. To assess the effect of fatigue, differences of MS, MD, and PSD values between 66 left and right eyes were evaluated regarding alterations between these 3 examinations.
RESULTS: After 3 test sessions, significant improvements were found in MS and MD among all 3 tests (P ≤ .01), and in PSD between test 1 and test 3 (P = .02). Test duration decreased significantly between tests 1 and 3 (P = .01); fixation-loss errors decreased significantly between tests 2 and 3 and between tests 1 and 3 (P = .02, respectively). Test points with p < 0.5% decreased significantly between tests 1 and 2 (P = .04) and 1 and 3 (P = .01) When comparing both eyes, MS, MD, and PSD were significantly better in first than in second eyes examined.
CONCLUSIONS: There exist significant learning and fatigue effects for repeated flicker defined form perimetry. For good and reliable results on FDF perimetry, at least 3 tests should be performed in an individual. Between the tests of both eyes, a rest should be offered.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21470593     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  7 in total

1.  [Importance of flicker contrast tests in functional glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  K Göbel; C M Poloschek; C Erb; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Flicker and conventional perimetry in comparison with structural changes in glaucoma].

Authors:  F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Jan Kremers; Christian Y Mardin; Anselm G Jünemann; Werner Adler; Ralf P Tornow
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Vicki Scharch; Christian Y Mardin; Robert Lämmer; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  [Influence of dry eye syndrome on glaucoma diagnostic procedures].

Authors:  F Rüfer; C Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Detection of glaucoma in a cohort of chinese subjects with systemic hypertension.

Authors:  Rita A Gangwani; Jonathan Chan; Jacky Lee; Alfred Kwong; Jimmy S M Lai
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers.

Authors:  Luke X Chong; Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.