Literature DB >> 21469160

Determining equilibrium constants for dimerization reactions from molecular dynamics simulations.

Djurre H De Jong1, Lars V Schäfer, Alex H De Vries, Siewert J Marrink, Herman J C Berendsen, Helmut Grubmüller.   

Abstract

With today's available computer power, free energy calculations from equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations "via counting" become feasible for an increasing number of reactions. An example is the dimerization reaction of transmembrane alpha-helices. If an extended simulation of the two helices covers sufficiently many dimerization and dissociation events, their binding free energy is readily derived from the fraction of time during which the two helices are observed in dimeric form. Exactly how the correct value for the free energy is to be calculated, however, is unclear, and indeed several different and contradictory approaches have been used. In particular, results obtained via Boltzmann statistics differ from those determined via the law of mass action. Here, we develop a theory that resolves this discrepancy. We show that for simulation systems containing two molecules, the dimerization free energy is given by a formula of the form ΔG ∝ ln(P(1) /P(0) ). Our theory is also applicable to high concentrations that typically have to be used in molecular dynamics simulations to keep the simulation system small, where the textbook dilute approximations fail. It also covers simulations with an arbitrary number of monomers and dimers and provides rigorous error estimates. Comparison with test simulations of a simple Lennard Jones system with various particle numbers as well as with reference free energy values obtained from radial distribution functions show full agreement for both binding free energies and dimerization statistics.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21469160     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  17 in total

1.  Classical Molecular Dynamics with Mobile Protons.

Authors:  Themis Lazaridis; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Computational Tools for Accurate Binding Free-Energy Prediction.

Authors:  Maria M Reif; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Physics of the Nuclear Pore Complex: Theory, Modeling and Experiment.

Authors:  Bart W Hoogenboom; Loren E Hough; Edward A Lemke; Roderick Y H Lim; Patrick R Onck; Anton Zilman
Journal:  Phys Rep       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 30.510

4.  Olanzapine crystal symmetry originates in preformed centrosymmetric solute dimers.

Authors:  Monika Warzecha; Lakshmanji Verma; Blair F Johnston; Jeremy C Palmer; Alastair J Florence; Peter G Vekilov
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 24.427

5.  Self-association of a highly charged arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptide.

Authors:  Giulio Tesei; Mario Vazdar; Malene Ringkjøbing Jensen; Carolina Cragnell; Phil E Mason; Jan Heyda; Marie Skepö; Pavel Jungwirth; Mikael Lund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Physical modeling of multivalent interactions in the nuclear pore complex.

Authors:  Luke K Davis; Anđela Šarić; Bart W Hoogenboom; Anton Zilman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Dynamic Cholesterol-Conditioned Dimerization of the G Protein Coupled Chemokine Receptor Type 4.

Authors:  Kristyna Pluhackova; Stefan Gahbauer; Franziska Kranz; Tsjerk A Wassenaar; Rainer A Böckmann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Spatial simulations in systems biology: from molecules to cells.

Authors:  Michael Klann; Heinz Koeppl
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Using interpolation for fast and accurate calculation of ion-ion interactions.

Authors:  Miha Lukšič; Christopher J Fennell; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  An Amphotericin B Derivative Equally Potent to Amphotericin B and with Increased Safety.

Authors:  Armando Antillón; Alexander H de Vries; Marcel Espinosa-Caballero; José Marcos Falcón-González; David Flores Romero; Javier González-Damián; Fabiola Eloísa Jiménez-Montejo; Angel León-Buitimea; Manuel López-Ortiz; Ricardo Magaña; Siewert J Marrink; Rosmarbel Morales-Nava; Xavier Periole; Jorge Reyes-Esparza; Josué Rodríguez Lozada; Tania Minerva Santiago-Angelino; María Cristina Vargas González; Ignacio Regla; Mauricio Carrillo-Tripp; Mario Fernández-Zertuche; Lourdes Rodríguez-Fragoso; Iván Ortega-Blake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.