PURPOSE: To determine whether automated temporoparietal brain volumes can be used to accurately predict future memory decline among a multicenter cohort of cognitively healthy elderly individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board at each site and was HIPAA compliant, with written consent obtained from all participants. One hundred forty-nine cognitively healthy study participants were recruited through the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and underwent a standardized baseline 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination, as well as neuropsychological assessment at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up. A composite memory score for the 2-year change in the results of two delayed-recall tests was calculated, and memory decline was defined as a composite score that was at least 1 standard deviation below the group mean score. The predictive accuracy of the brain volumes was estimated by using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and was further assessed by using leave-one-out cross validation. RESULTS: Use of the most accurate region model, which included the hippocampus; parahippocampal gyrus; amygdala; superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyri; superior parietal lobe; and posterior cingulate gyrus, resulted in a fitted accuracy of 94% and a cross-validated accuracy of 81%. CONCLUSION: Study results indicate that automated temporal and parietal volumes can be used to identify with high accuracy cognitively healthy individuals who are at risk for future memory decline. Further validation of this predictive model in a new cohort is required. RSNA, 2011
PURPOSE: To determine whether automated temporoparietal brain volumes can be used to accurately predict future memory decline among a multicenter cohort of cognitively healthy elderly individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board at each site and was HIPAA compliant, with written consent obtained from all participants. One hundred forty-nine cognitively healthy study participants were recruited through the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and underwent a standardized baseline 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination, as well as neuropsychological assessment at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up. A composite memory score for the 2-year change in the results of two delayed-recall tests was calculated, and memory decline was defined as a composite score that was at least 1 standard deviation below the group mean score. The predictive accuracy of the brain volumes was estimated by using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and was further assessed by using leave-one-out cross validation. RESULTS: Use of the most accurate region model, which included the hippocampus; parahippocampal gyrus; amygdala; superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyri; superior parietal lobe; and posterior cingulate gyrus, resulted in a fitted accuracy of 94% and a cross-validated accuracy of 81%. CONCLUSION: Study results indicate that automated temporal and parietal volumes can be used to identify with high accuracy cognitively healthy individuals who are at risk for future memory decline. Further validation of this predictive model in a new cohort is required. RSNA, 2011
Authors: D P Devanand; Arthur Mikhno; Gregory H Pelton; Katrina Cuasay; Gnanavalli Pradhaban; J S Dileep Kumar; Neil Upton; Robert Lai; Roger N Gunn; V Libri; Xinhua Liu; Ronald van Heertum; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Cynthia M Stonnington; Carlton Chu; Stefan Klöppel; Clifford R Jack; John Ashburner; Richard S J Frackowiak Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Il Han Choo; Dong Young Lee; Jungsu S Oh; Jae Sung Lee; Dong Soo Lee; In Chan Song; Jong Choul Youn; Shin Gyeom Kim; Ki Woong Kim; Jin Hyeong Jhoo; Jong Inn Woo Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: R C Petersen; P S Aisen; L A Beckett; M C Donohue; A C Gamst; D J Harvey; C R Jack; W J Jagust; L M Shaw; A W Toga; J Q Trojanowski; M W Weiner Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Howard J Cabral; Christopher P Hess; William P Dillon; Christine M Glastonbury; Michael W Weiner; Nicholas J Schmansky; Douglas N Greve; David H Salat; Randy L Buckner; Bruce Fischl Journal: Brain Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Kevin P High; Mark Brennan-Ing; David B Clifford; Mardge H Cohen; Judith Currier; Steven G Deeks; Sherry Deren; Rita B Effros; Kelly Gebo; Jörg J Goronzy; Amy C Justice; Alan Landay; Jules Levin; Paolo G Miotti; Robert J Munk; Heidi Nass; Charles R Rinaldo; Michael G Shlipak; Russell Tracy; Victor Valcour; David E Vance; Jeremy D Walston; Paul Volberding Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Jesse Cedarbaum; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Johan Luthman; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie Shaw; Li Shen; Adam Schwarz; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kwangsik Nho; Shannon L Risacher; Paul K Crane; Charles DeCarli; M Maria Glymour; Christian Habeck; Sungeun Kim; Grace J Lee; Elizabeth Mormino; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Li Shen; John D West; Andrew J Saykin Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Enchi Liu; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Mark E Schmidt; Leslie Shaw; Li Shen; Judith A Siuciak; Holly Soares; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 21.566