BACKGROUND: Many telephone quit lines provide free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to smokers who are trying to stop smoking. However, providing free NRT to smokers can be costly. OBJECTIVE: To compare NRT usage patterns, quit rate, and costs of giving smokers calling a telephone quit line different amounts of free NRT. DESIGN: A 3-group randomized trial was conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2806 adult smokers of 10+ cigarettes per day who called the New York State Smokers' Quit Line (NYSSQL) were sent different amounts of nicotine patches for free as follows: (1) a 2-week supply of nicotine patches, (2) a 4-week supply, and (3) a 6-week supply. In addition, all study participants received a free stop smoking guide plus 1 proactive follow-up call attempt conducted 2 weeks after initially contacting the NYSSQL. Of the 2806 enrolled participants, 1682 completed the 7-month follow-up to assess their use of the NRT sent to them and smoking status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nicotine patch usage, quit rates, reductions in cigarette consumption, and cost-effectiveness measures. RESULTS: Most respondents (85%) reported using the nicotine patches sent to them, although the amount used varied in direct proportion to the amount sent. The 7- and 30-day nonsmoker prevalence rates measured at 7-month follow-up did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. The cost per attributable quit was also not significantly different between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Sending out more than a free 2-week supply of patches to smokers who contact a quit line is no more effective in achieving smoking cessation than sending just 2 weeks of patches.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Many telephone quit lines provide free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to smokers who are trying to stop smoking. However, providing free NRT to smokers can be costly. OBJECTIVE: To compare NRT usage patterns, quit rate, and costs of giving smokers calling a telephone quit line different amounts of free NRT. DESIGN: A 3-group randomized trial was conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2806 adult smokers of 10+ cigarettes per day who called the New York State Smokers' Quit Line (NYSSQL) were sent different amounts of nicotine patches for free as follows: (1) a 2-week supply of nicotine patches, (2) a 4-week supply, and (3) a 6-week supply. In addition, all study participants received a free stop smoking guide plus 1 proactive follow-up call attempt conducted 2 weeks after initially contacting the NYSSQL. Of the 2806 enrolled participants, 1682 completed the 7-month follow-up to assess their use of the NRT sent to them and smoking status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nicotine patch usage, quit rates, reductions in cigarette consumption, and cost-effectiveness measures. RESULTS: Most respondents (85%) reported using the nicotine patches sent to them, although the amount used varied in direct proportion to the amount sent. The 7- and 30-day nonsmoker prevalence rates measured at 7-month follow-up did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. The cost per attributable quit was also not significantly different between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Sending out more than a free 2-week supply of patches to smokers who contact a quit line is no more effective in achieving smoking cessation than sending just 2 weeks of patches.
Authors: David B Buller; Ron Borland; Erwin P Bettinghaus; James H Shane; Donald E Zimmerman Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: David B Buller; Abigail Halperin; Herbert H Severson; Ron Borland; Michael D Slater; Erwin P Bettinghaus; David Tinkelman; Gary R Cutter; William Gill Woodall Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2014 Mar-Apr
Authors: Marina Unrod; Vani N Simmons; Steven K Sutton; K Michael Cummings; Paula Celestino; Benjamin M Craig; Ji-Hyun Lee; Lauren R Meltzer; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Stevens S Smith; Paula A Keller; Kate H Kobinsky; Timothy B Baker; David L Fraser; Terry Bush; Brooke Magnusson; Susan M Zbikowski; Timothy A McAfee; Michael C Fiore Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Bianca F Jardin; Karen L Cropsey; Amy E Wahlquist; Kevin M Gray; Gerard A Silvestri; K Michael Cummings; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Matthew J Carpenter; Amy E Wahlquist; Jennifer Dahne; Kevin M Gray; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; K Michael Cummings; Robert Davis; Brent M Egan Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Douglas E Levy; Elissa V Klinger; Jeffrey A Linder; Eric W Fleegler; Nancy A Rigotti; Elyse R Park; Jennifer S Haas Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sandra J Japuntich; Susan Regan; Joseph Viana; Justyna Tymoszczuk; Michele Reyen; Douglas E Levy; Daniel E Singer; Elyse R Park; Yuchiao Chang; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: Trials Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 2.279