Literature DB >> 21463344

Event-free survival following CRT with surgically implanted LV leads versus standard transvenous approach.

Amy L Miller1, Daniel B Kramer, Eldrin F Lewis, Bruce Koplan, Laurence M Epstein, Usha Tedrow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While surgical epicardial lead placement is performed in a subset of cardiac resynchronization therapy patients, data comparing survival following surgical versus transvenous lead placement are limited. We hypothesized that surgical procedures would be associated with increased mortality risk.
METHODS: Long-term event-free survival was assessed for 480 consecutive patients undergoing surgical (48) or percutaneous (432) left ventricle (LV) lead placement at our institution from January 2000 to September 2008.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between groups. While there was no statistically significant difference in overall event-free survival (P = 0.13), when analysis was restricted to surgical patients with isolated surgical lead placement (n = 28), event-free survival was significantly lower in surgical patients (P = 0.015). There appeared to be an early risk (first approximately 3 months postimplantation) with surgical lead placement, primarily in LV lead-only patients. Event rates were significantly higher in LV lead-only surgical patients than in transvenous patients in the first 3 months (P = 0.006). In proportional hazards analysis comparing isolated surgical LV lead placement to transvenous lead placement, adjusted hazard ratios were 1.8 ([1.1,2.7] P = 0.02) and 1.3 ([1.0,1.7] P = 0.07) for the first 3 months and for the full duration of follow-up, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated surgical LV lead placement appears to carry a small but significant upfront mortality cost, with risk extending beyond the immediate postoperative period. Long-term survival is similar, suggesting those surviving beyond this period of early risk derive the same benefit as coronary sinus lead recipients. Further work is needed to identify risk factors associated with early mortality following surgical lead placement. ©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21463344      PMCID: PMC3079428          DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.03014.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  34 in total

1.  Six year experience of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for permanent biventricular pacing in patients with advanced heart failure: technical aspects.

Authors:  C Alonso; C Leclercq; F R d'Allonnes; D Pavin; F Victor; P Mabo; J C Daubert
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Biventricular pacing in end-stage heart failure improves functional capacity and left ventricular function.

Authors:  P F Bakker; H W Meijburg; J W de Vries; M M Mower; A C Thomas; M L Hull; E O Robles De Medina; J J Bredée
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Epicardial versus transvenous left ventricular lead placement in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  N Doll; C Piorkowski; M Czesla; M Kallenbach; A J Rastan; A Arya; F W Mohr
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; David P Faxon; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  A prospective longitudinal evaluation of the benefits of epicardial lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ashish Patwala; Paul Woods; Richard Clements; Khaled Albouaini; Archana Rao; David Goldspink; Lip-Bun Tan; Aung Oo; David Wright
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Twenty years experience with pediatric pacing: epicardial and transvenous stimulation.

Authors:  J S Sachweh; J F Vazquez-Jimenez; F A Schöndube; S H Daebritz; H Dörge; E G Mühler; B J Messmer
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Biventricular pacing diminishes the need for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Ventak CHF Investigators.

Authors:  S L Higgins; P Yong; D Sheck; M McDaniel; F Bollinger; M Vadecha; S Desai; D B Meyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Cardiac resynchronization and death from progressive heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  David J Bradley; Elizabeth A Bradley; Kenneth L Baughman; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Steven N Goodman; David A Kass; Neil R Powe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Surgically placed left ventricular leads provide similar outcomes to percutaneous leads in patients with failed coronary sinus lead placement.

Authors:  Gorav Ailawadi; Damien J Lapar; Brian R Swenson; Cory D Maxwell; Micah E Girotti; James D Bergin; John A Kern; John P Dimarco; Srijoy Mahapatra
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic implantation of the left ventricular pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Rajwinder S Jutley; David A Waller; Ian Loke; Douglas Skehan; Andre Ng; Peter Stafford; Derek Chin; T J Spyt
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  8 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided thoracotomy for implantation of an epicardial left ventricular lead after left pneumonectomy.

Authors:  Guy Vandenplas; Frederic Van Heuverswyn; Benny Drieghe; Stefaan Bouchez
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-25

2.  Seven years of use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies: a nationwide population-based assessment of their effectiveness in real clinical settings.

Authors:  Arn Migowski; Antonio Luiz Ribeiro; Marilia Sá Carvalho; Vitor Manuel Pereira Azevedo; Rogério Brant Martins Chaves; Lucas de Aquino Hashimoto; Carolina de Aquino Xavier; Regina Maria de Aquino Xavier
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Pump up the volume: Cardiac resynchronization therapy to improve renal function.

Authors:  Roy M John
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-11-09

4.  Sex-specific mortality differences in heart failure patients with ischemia receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Zhonglin Han; Zheng Chen; Rongfang Lan; Wencheng Di; Xiaohong Li; Hongsong Yu; Wenqing Ji; Xinlin Zhang; Biao Xu; Wei Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in coronary sinus atresia delivered using leadless endocardial pacing.

Authors:  Dewi E Thomas; Nicholas M Child; W Andrew Owens; Nicholas J Linker; Simon A James; Andrew J Turley
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-07-01

6.  Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Zhang; Xu Meng; Jie Han; Yan Li; Ye Zhang; Teng-Yong Jiang; Ying-Xin Zhao; Yu-Jie Zhou
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 7.  Innovations in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Challenges and Upcoming Solutions in 2018 and Beyond.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Alan Sugure; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-12-15

8.  Fracture of an epicardial left ventricular lead implanted at open-heart surgery in anticipation of future need for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jacob Moesgaard Larsen; Jamil Bashir; Zachary William Laksman
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.