Literature DB >> 21463296

Cryptic genetic variation and body size evolution in threespine stickleback.

Katrina McGuigan1, Nicole Nishimura, Mark Currey, Dan Hurwit, William A Cresko.   

Abstract

The role of environment as a selective agent is well-established. Environment might also influence evolution by altering the expression of genetic variation associated with phenotypes under selection. Far less is known about this phenomenon, particularly its contribution to evolution in novel environments. We investigated how environment affected the evolvability of body size in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Gasterosteus aculeatus is well suited to addressing this question due to the rapid evolution of smaller size in the numerous freshwater populations established following the colonization of new freshwater habitats by an oceanic ancestor. The repeated, rapid evolution of size following colonization contrasts with the general observation of low phenotypic variation in oceanic stickleback. We reared an oceanic population of stickleback under high and low salinity conditions, mimicking a key component of the ancestral environment, and freshwater colonization, respectively. There was low genetic variation for body size under high salinity, but this variance increased significantly when fish were reared under low salinity. We therefore conclude that oceanic populations harbor the standing genetic variation necessary for the evolution of body size, but that this variation only becomes available to selection upon colonization of a new habitat.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21463296     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01195.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  35 in total

1.  Evolution of growth by genetic accommodation in Icelandic freshwater stickleback.

Authors:  Beren W Robinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Extensive linkage disequilibrium and parallel adaptive divergence across threespine stickleback genomes.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Mark Currey; William A Cresko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The role of variation and plasticity in parental care during the adaptive radiation of three-spine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Laura R Stein; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Is adaptation to climate change really constrained in niche specialists?

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Causes and consequences of genetic background effects illuminated by integrative genomic analysis.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; David Tack; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Partial reproductive isolation of a recently derived resident-freshwater population of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from its putative anadromous ancestor.

Authors:  Christoff G Furin; Frank A von Hippel; Michael A Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Cryptic genetic variation: evolution's hidden substrate.

Authors:  Annalise B Paaby; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Ancestral Plasticity and Allometry in Threespine Stickleback Fish Reveal Phenotypes Associated with Derived, Freshwater Ecotypes.

Authors:  Matthew A Wund; Sophie Valena; Susan Wood; John A Baker
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 9.  Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Degeneracy allows for both apparent homogeneity and diversification in populations.

Authors:  James M Whitacre; Sergei P Atamas
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.