BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest center (CAC) criteria are not well defined, nor is their potential impact on current emergency medical services (EMS) transportation practices for post-cardiac arrest (PCA) patients. In addition to the availability of emergent cardiac catheterization (CATH) and therapeutic hypothermia (TH), high-volume centers and those with PCA protocols have been associated with improved outcomes. Objectives. This study aimed 1) to identify the PCA treatment capabilities of receiving hospitals in a 10-county regional EMS system without official CAC designation and 2) to determine the proportion of PCA patients who are transported to hospitals meeting three proposed CAC definitions. We hypothesized that a majority of patients are already transported to hospitals that meet proposed CAC criteria. METHODS: We distributed a survey to 34 receiving hospitals to determine availability and volume of CATH, TH, a PCA protocol, and a 24-hour intensivist. We conducted a retrospective study of adult, nontrauma cardiac arrest patients transported with a pulse from 2006 to 2008 for 16 EMS agencies. The proportions of patients transported to hospitals meeting three CAC criteria were compared: criteria A (availability of CATH and TH), criteria B (criteria A, >200 CATHs per year, and a PCA protocol), and criteria C (criteria B and a 24-hour intensivist). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 31 of 34 hospitals (91.1%), of which 10 (32.3%) met criteria A, seven (22.6%) met criteria B, and six (19.4%) met criteria C. Of 1,193 cardiac arrest patients, 46 (3.9%) were excluded because of transport to a pediatric, closed, or out-of-region hospital. There were 335 patients (81.1%) with return of spontaneous circulation and a pulse present upon arrival at the destination facility transported to hospitals meeting criteria A, 304 patients (73.6%) transported to hospitals meeting criteria B, and 273 patients (66.1%) transported to hospitals meeting criteria C. CONCLUSIONS: In a region without official CAC designation, only one-third of hospitals meet basic CAC criteria (CATH and TH), but those facilities receive 81% of PCA patients. Fewer patients (66%) are transported to hospitals meeting more stringent CAC criteria. These data describe the potential impact of developing a CAC policy based on current transportation practices.
BACKGROUND:Cardiac arrest center (CAC) criteria are not well defined, nor is their potential impact on current emergency medical services (EMS) transportation practices for post-cardiac arrest (PCA) patients. In addition to the availability of emergent cardiac catheterization (CATH) and therapeutic hypothermia (TH), high-volume centers and those with PCA protocols have been associated with improved outcomes. Objectives. This study aimed 1) to identify the PCA treatment capabilities of receiving hospitals in a 10-county regional EMS system without official CAC designation and 2) to determine the proportion of PCA patients who are transported to hospitals meeting three proposed CAC definitions. We hypothesized that a majority of patients are already transported to hospitals that meet proposed CAC criteria. METHODS: We distributed a survey to 34 receiving hospitals to determine availability and volume of CATH, TH, a PCA protocol, and a 24-hour intensivist. We conducted a retrospective study of adult, nontrauma cardiac arrestpatients transported with a pulse from 2006 to 2008 for 16 EMS agencies. The proportions of patients transported to hospitals meeting three CAC criteria were compared: criteria A (availability of CATH and TH), criteria B (criteria A, >200 CATHs per year, and a PCA protocol), and criteria C (criteria B and a 24-hour intensivist). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 31 of 34 hospitals (91.1%), of which 10 (32.3%) met criteria A, seven (22.6%) met criteria B, and six (19.4%) met criteria C. Of 1,193 cardiac arrestpatients, 46 (3.9%) were excluded because of transport to a pediatric, closed, or out-of-region hospital. There were 335 patients (81.1%) with return of spontaneous circulation and a pulse present upon arrival at the destination facility transported to hospitals meeting criteria A, 304 patients (73.6%) transported to hospitals meeting criteria B, and 273 patients (66.1%) transported to hospitals meeting criteria C. CONCLUSIONS: In a region without official CAC designation, only one-third of hospitals meet basic CAC criteria (CATH and TH), but those facilities receive 81% of PCA patients. Fewer patients (66%) are transported to hospitals meeting more stringent CAC criteria. These data describe the potential impact of developing a CAC policy based on current transportation practices.
Authors: Joseph S Ross; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Yun Wang; Dennis T Ko; Jersey Chen; Elizabeth E Drye; Patricia S Keenan; Judith H Lichtman; Héctor Bueno; Geoffrey C Schreiner; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel W Spaite; Ian G Stiell; Bentley J Bobrow; Melanie de Boer; Justin Maloney; Kurt Denninghoff; Tyler F Vadeboncoeur; Jonathan Dreyer; George A Wells Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Brendan G Carr; Munish Goyal; Roger A Band; David F Gaieski; Benjamin S Abella; Raina M Merchant; Charles C Branas; Lance B Becker; Robert W Neumar Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Brendan G Carr; Jeremy M Kahn; Raina M Merchant; Andrew A Kramer; Robert W Neumar Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Raina M Merchant; Benjamin S Abella; Monica Khan; Kuang-Ning Huang; David G Beiser; Robert W Neumar; Brendan G Carr; Lance B Becker; Terry L Vanden Hoek Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Joshua C Reynolds; Clifton W Callaway; Samar R El Khoudary; Charity G Moore; René J Alvarez; Jon C Rittenberger Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Graham Nichol; Tom P Aufderheide; Brian Eigel; Robert W Neumar; Keith G Lurie; Vincent J Bufalino; Clifton W Callaway; Venugopal Menon; Robert R Bass; Benjamin S Abella; Michael Sayre; Cynthia M Dougherty; Edward M Racht; Monica E Kleinman; Robert E O'Connor; John P Reilly; Eric W Ossmann; Eric Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 29.690