STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify any association between out-of-hospital transport interval and survival to hospital discharge in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: Data from the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study (January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2002), an Utstein-compliant registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients from 21 communities, were analyzed. Logistic regression identified factors that were independently associated with survival in consecutive adult, nontraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients and in the subgroup with return of spontaneous circulation. RESULTS: A total of 18,987 patients met criteria and 15,559 (81.9%) had complete data for analysis (study group). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 2,299 patients (14.8%), and 689 (4.4%) survived to hospital discharge. Median transport interval was 4.0 minutes (25th quartile 3.0 minutes; 75th quartile 6.2 minutes) for survivors and 4.2 minutes (25th quartile 3.0, 75th quartile 6.2) for nonsurvivors. Logistic regression revealed multiple factors that were independently associated with survival: witnessed arrest (odds ratio 2.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.05 to 3.34), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.82 to 2.70), initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (odds ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.97 to 2.50), and shorter emergency medical services (EMS) response interval (odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.33). There was no association between transport interval and survival in either the study group (odds ratio 1.01; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.05) or the return of spontaneous circulation subgroup (odds ratio 1.04; 95% CI 0.99, 1.08). CONCLUSION: In a large out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study from demographically diverse EMS systems, longer transport interval was not associated with decreased survival. Given the growing evidence showing major influence from specialized postarrest care, these findings support conducting clinical trials that assess the effectiveness and safety of bypassing local hospitals to take patients to regional cardiac arrest centers.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify any association between out-of-hospital transport interval and survival to hospital discharge in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: Data from the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study (January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2002), an Utstein-compliant registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrestpatients from 21 communities, were analyzed. Logistic regression identified factors that were independently associated with survival in consecutive adult, nontraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrestpatients and in the subgroup with return of spontaneous circulation. RESULTS: A total of 18,987 patients met criteria and 15,559 (81.9%) had complete data for analysis (study group). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 2,299 patients (14.8%), and 689 (4.4%) survived to hospital discharge. Median transport interval was 4.0 minutes (25th quartile 3.0 minutes; 75th quartile 6.2 minutes) for survivors and 4.2 minutes (25th quartile 3.0, 75th quartile 6.2) for nonsurvivors. Logistic regression revealed multiple factors that were independently associated with survival: witnessed arrest (odds ratio 2.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.05 to 3.34), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.82 to 2.70), initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (odds ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.97 to 2.50), and shorter emergency medical services (EMS) response interval (odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.33). There was no association between transport interval and survival in either the study group (odds ratio 1.01; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.05) or the return of spontaneous circulation subgroup (odds ratio 1.04; 95% CI 0.99, 1.08). CONCLUSION: In a large out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study from demographically diverse EMS systems, longer transport interval was not associated with decreased survival. Given the growing evidence showing major influence from specialized postarrest care, these findings support conducting clinical trials that assess the effectiveness and safety of bypassing local hospitals to take patients to regional cardiac arrest centers.
Authors: Christopher W Seymour; Osama Alotaik; David J Wallace; Ahmed E Elhabashy; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Thomas D Rea; Derek C Angus; Graham Nichol; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jason S Haukoos; Gary Witt; Craig Gravitz; Julianne Dean; David M Jackson; Thomas Candlin; Peter Vellman; John Riccio; Kennon Heard; Tom Kazutomi; Dylan Luyten; Gilbert Pineda; Jeff Gunter; Jennifer Biltoft; Christopher Colwell Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Christian Martin-Gill; Christopher P Dilger; Francis X Guyette; Jon C Rittenberger; Clifton W Callaway Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Rosa María Hormeño Bermejo; Juan Antonio Cordero Torres; Gloria Garcés Ibáñez; Antonia Escobar Escobar; Alberto Javier Santos García; Jesús Arroyo Fernández de Aguilar Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2011-02-20 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Michael T Cudnik; Comilla Sasson; Thomas D Rea; Michael R Sayre; Jianying Zhang; Bentley J Bobrow; Daniel W Spaite; Bryan McNally; Kurt Denninghoff; Uwe Stolz Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2012-02-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Chika Nishiyama; Siobhan P Brown; Susanne May; Taku Iwami; Rudolph W Koster; Stefanie G Beesems; Markku Kuisma; Ari Salo; Ian Jacobs; Judith Finn; Fritz Sterz; Alexander Nürnberger; Karen Smith; Laurie Morrison; Theresa M Olasveengen; Clifton W Callaway; Sang Do Shin; Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Mohamud Daya; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Johan Herlitz; Anneli Strömsöe; Tom P Aufderheide; Siobhán Masterson; Henry Wang; Jim Christenson; Ian Stiell; Dan Davis; Ella Huszti; Graham Nichol Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 5.262