Literature DB >> 21461953

Comparison and correlates of three preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures among overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence.

Angela Marinilli Pinto1, Miriam Kuppermann, Sanae Nakagawa, Eric Vittinghoff, Rena R Wing, John W Kusek, William H Herman, Leslee L Subak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare three preference-based health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) measures and examine independent correlates of HRQL among overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence (UI) enrolled in a weight loss intervention trial.
METHODS: Participants completed baseline questionnaires, which included the Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI3) and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). The SF-36 was used to derive SF-6D and estimated Quality of Well-Being (eQWB) scores. Height, weight, medical history, incontinence measures, and level of physical activity also were assessed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed, and differences in mean scores across HRQL measures were examined. Potential correlates of HUI3, SF-6D, and eQWB scores were evaluated using multivariable generalized linear models.
RESULTS: Mean ± SD scores for the HUI3, SF-6D, and eQWB were 0.81 ± 0.18, 0.75 ± 0.10, and 0.71 ± 0.06, respectively. Significant differences were observed across measures (P < 0.0001), and the overall ICC was 0.36. In multivariable analyses, BMI was negatively associated with HUI3 (P = 0.003) and eQWB (P < 0.001), and UI episode frequency was negatively associated with eQWB (P = 0.015) and SF-6D (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in mean utilities across the HUI3, SF-6D, and eQWB indicate that these measures do not assess identical dimensions of HRQL. Both BMI and UI episode frequency were related to HRQL in this cohort; however, the magnitude of the relationship depended on the preference-based measure used. These findings highlight the need to consider the method used to generate HRQL values for calculating quality-adjusted life-years in cost-utility analyses, since choice of method may have a substantial impact on the outcome of the analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21461953      PMCID: PMC3174313          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9896-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  53 in total

Review 1.  A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

Authors:  J Brazier; M Deverill; C Green; R Harper; A Booth
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

Authors:  James W Shaw; Jeffrey A Johnson; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Estimating utility values for health states of overweight and obese individuals using the SF-36.

Authors:  Michael A Kortt; Philip M Clarke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The impact of the overactive bladder on health-related utility and quality of life.

Authors:  Craig J Currie; Phil McEwan; Chris D Poole; Isaac A O Odeyemi; Shibendra N Datta; Christopher L Morgan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Margaret R Grove; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Alan S Hilibrand; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population.

Authors:  N Mittmann; K Trakas; N Risebrough; B A Liu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Barry I Graubard; David F Williamson; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The impact of obesity on health-related quality-of-life in the general adult US population.

Authors:  Haomiao Jia; Erica I Lubetkin
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 2.341

10.  Risk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women.

Authors:  Kim N Danforth; Mary K Townsend; Karen Lifford; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effect of weight loss on changes in health-related quality of life among overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Angela Marinilli Pinto; Leslee L Subak; Sanae Nakagawa; Eric Vittinghoff; Rena R Wing; John W Kusek; William H Herman; Delia Smith West; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Bodyweight, gender, and quality of life: a population-based longitudinal study.

Authors:  Rochelle E Garner; David H Feeny; Amanda Thompson; Julie Bernier; Bentson H McFarland; Nathalie Huguet; Mark S Kaplan; Heather Orpana; Nancy A Ross; Chris Blanchard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Psychometric properties of the incontinence utility index among patients with idiopathic overactive bladder: data from two multicenter, double-blind, randomized, Phase 3, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Nacho Castejón; Kristin Khalaf; Quanhong Ni; Jesús Cuervo; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Application of Rasch model for evaluating the quality of life in blind war veterans.

Authors:  Nasim Vahabi; Mahmood Reza Gohari; Ali Azarbar; Masoud Salehi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2014-05-07

5.  The validity and responsiveness of the ICECAP-A capability-well-being measure in women with irritative lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Ilias Goranitis; Joanna Coast; Hareth Al-Janabi; Pallavi Latthe; Tracy E Roberts
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Preference-based measure of health-related quality of life and its determinants in sickle cell disease in Nigeria.

Authors:  Adedokun Oluwafemi Ojelabi; Afolabi Elijah Bamgboye; Jonathan Ling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development of the Incontinence Utility Index: estimating population-based utilities associated with urinary problems from the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire and Neurogenic Module.

Authors:  Jesús Cuervo; Nacho Castejón; Kristin M Khalaf; Catherine Waweru; Denise Globe; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Two phase I/II clinical trials for the treatment of urinary incontinence with autologous mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Mariano Garcia-Arranz; Sergio Alonso-Gregorio; Pamela Fontana-Portella; Elena Bravo; Jesus Diez Sebastian; María Eugenia Fernandez-Santos; Damian Garcia-Olmo
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 6.940

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.