Literature DB >> 21461713

Do we still need human embryonic stem cells for stem cell-based therapies? Epistemic and ethical aspects.

Kristina Hug1, Göran Hermerén.   

Abstract

While scientific community disagrees about similarities and differences between human embryonic stem (hES) cells and human induced pluripotent stem (hiPS) cells, some politicians embrace translational hiPS cell research as a replacement for translational hES cell research. We examine the ethical relevance of the main differences between hES and hiPS cell-based therapies and discuss whether, given the current state of knowledge, certain differences are essential. We discuss whether well-founded preferences can be made in hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of patient safety, treatment efficacy, treatment accessibility and ethical controversy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21461713     DOI: 10.1007/s12015-011-9257-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   5.739


  38 in total

1.  Stem cells: Tailor-made diseased neurons.

Authors:  Michael Sendtner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Will iPS cells enhance therapeutic applicability of cord blood cells and banking?

Authors:  Hal E Broxmeyer
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  Administrative and research policies required to bring cellular therapies from the research laboratory to the patient's bedside.

Authors:  Robyn Yim
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  iPS cell technology in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Christopher J Lengner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Research ethics. Beyond access vs. protection in trials of innovative therapies.

Authors:  Alex John London; Jonathan Kimmelman; Marina Elena Emborg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Viable iPSC mice: a step closer to therapeutic applications in humans?

Authors:  Dean H Betts; Bill Kalionis
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation.

Authors:  Xiao-yang Zhao; Wei Li; Zhuo Lv; Lei Liu; Man Tong; Tang Hai; Jie Hao; Chang-long Guo; Qing-wen Ma; Liu Wang; Fanyi Zeng; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Ethics and stem cell therapeutics for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 9.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: current progress and potential for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Giovanni Amabile; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.951

10.  Differential modeling of fragile X syndrome by human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Achia Urbach; Ori Bar-Nur; George Q Daley; Nissim Benvenisty
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 24.633

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Neurotrophin Signaling and Stem Cells-Implications for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Stem Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Subrata Pramanik; Yanuar Alan Sulistio; Klaus Heese
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 2.  Ethical Issues for Clinical Studies That use Human Embryonic Stem Cells: The 2014 Revisions to the Japanese Guidelines.

Authors:  Hiroshi Mizuno
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Myt1l induced direct reprogramming of pericytes into cholinergic neurons.

Authors:  Xing-Guang Liang; Chao Tan; Cheng-Kun Wang; Rong-Rong Tao; Yu-Jie Huang; Kui-Fen Ma; Kohji Fukunaga; Ming-Zhu Huang; Feng Han
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 5.243

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.