Literature DB >> 21460393

A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: methodological approaches.

P Díaz Del Campo1, J Gracia, J A Blasco, E Andradas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND An increasing number of initiatives involve patients in the development of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). However, the method used for patient involvement is fundamental to achieving a quality patient-oriented CPG. The objective is to present a strategy for patient involvement that includes both robust patient consultation and participation. This strategy is based on the authors' experience in the development of four CPGs included in the Spanish National CPG Development Program, which deemed it a valuable nation-wide patient involvement initiative. METHODS Patient consultation in the CPG preparation phase combines quantitative and qualitative primary research techniques as well as a systematic review of patient-perspective studies. Participation relies on patients and patient representatives as members of the guideline development groups in all development phases at the same level as professionals. NVivo 8 software was used to analyse discourses of qualitative data. RESULTS Patients and patient representatives provided relevant information on their perspectives, experiences with the illness, social circumstances, habits, values and preferences. They collaborated in different CPG development phases, including setting the scope and objectives, defining key research questions, writing and reviewing recommendations, developing patients' versions and the dissemination of CPGs. CONCLUSIONS The authors' strategy allows for patient-oriented CPG development, but it requires appropriate training and knowledge of qualitative research techniques (primary research and systematic review of qualitative evidence) for developers. It is also crucial to have specific support for patients, previously selected with eligibility criteria, to facilitate an effective engagement, providing clear guidance on their roles and ensuring opportunities to attend training events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21460393     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  25 in total

1.  Patients and practice guidelines: Keeping eyes on the horizon.

Authors:  John K Marshall
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015 Aug-Sep

2.  The Quality of Six Clinical Practice Guidelines in Health and Social Sciences: Are We on the Right Track?

Authors:  Catherine Hébert; Kia Watkins-Martin; Gabrielle Ciquier; Michelle Azzi; Martin Drapeau
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-04-18

3.  Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Yoon Duk Hong; Daisuke Goto; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 4.  Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review.

Authors:  K Horner; L O'Malley; K Taylor; A-M Glenny
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Using an Online, Modified Delphi Approach to Engage Patients and Caregivers in Determining the Patient-Centeredness of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Care Considerations.

Authors:  Dmitry Khodyakov; Sean Grant; Brian Denger; Kathi Kinnett; Ann Martin; Marika Booth; Courtney Armstrong; Emily Dao; Christine Chen; Ian Coulter; Holly Peay; Glen Hazlewood; Natalie Street
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Are patient education materials about cancer screening more effective when co-created with patients? A qualitative interview study and randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  N Y Bashir; J E Moore; D Buckland; M Rodrigues; M Tonelli; B D Thombs; N R Bell; W Isaranuwatchai; T Peng; D M Shilman; S E Straus
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid; Victoria Thomas; Toni Shaw; Gillian Leng
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 8.  Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.

Authors:  Nathan D Shippee; Juan Pablo Domecq Garces; Gabriela J Prutsky Lopez; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Mohammed Nabhan; Juan P Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Do not forget the professional--the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research.

Authors:  Maarten P T de Wit; Janneke E Elberse; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Tineke A Abma
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development: exploring the potential for articulating patient knowledge in evidence-based epistemic settings.

Authors:  Hester M van de Bovenkamp; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.