Literature DB >> 21459631

Lower rate of major bile duct injury and increased intraoperative management of common bile duct stones after implementation of routine intraoperative cholangiography.

K Tim Buddingh1, Rinse K Weersma, Rolf A J Savenije, Gooitzen M van Dam, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our university medical center is the only center in The Netherlands that has adopted a policy of routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy. This study aimed to describe the rate of bile duct injury (BDI) and management of common bile duct (CBD) stones before and after implementation of a routine IOC policy. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical records were reviewed of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the 3 years before implementation of routine IOC and 3 years after. Dissection with the goal to achieve the critical view of safety was the standard operative technique during the entire study period.
RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-one patients underwent cholecystectomy with selective IOC and 435 patients with routine IOC. Groups were similar in age, sex, comorbidity, indication for surgery, and surgical approach. IOC was attempted in 5.9% in the selective IOC group and 59.8% in the routine IOC group (p < 0.001). The rate of major BDI was 1.9% in the selective IOC group and 0% in the routine IOC group (p = 0.004). The injuries consisted of 5 type B and 3 type D injuries, according to the Amsterdam classification. The rate of minor BDI did not differ substantially among the groups. More CBD stones were detected in the routine IOC group (4.8% versus 1.0%; p = 0.001) and they were managed intraoperatively more frequently (2.8% versus 0.7%; p = 0.023). There was a trend toward fewer preoperative and postoperative ERCPs and other interventions for CBD stones (19.1% versus 24.2%; p = 0.067).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of routine IOC policy was followed by fewer major BDIs and higher rates of intraoperative CBD stone management.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21459631     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  25 in total

1.  Is the routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy really the key to lowering bile duct injuries?

Authors:  Giuseppe Spinoglio; Alessandra Marano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shanley B Deal; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Dana Telem; Robert D Fanelli; Marian McDonald; Michael Ujiki; L Michael Brunt; Adnan A Alseidi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Variation in the use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Yimei Han; Yong-Fang Kuo; Courtney M Townsend; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones.

Authors:  George Berci; John Hunter; Leon Morgenstern; Maurice Arregui; Michael Brunt; Brandon Carroll; Michael Edye; David Fermelia; George Ferzli; Frederick Greene; Joseph Petelin; Edward Phillips; Jeffrey Ponsky; Harry Sax; Steven Schwaitzberg; Nathaniel Soper; Lee Swanstrom; William Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Old is still gold.

Authors:  Keta L Keens; Kishore G Pursnani; Jeremy B Ward; Ravindra S Date
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-01

Review 6.  Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Cinzia Tommasi; Roberto Manetti; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

7.  Prevention of bile duct injury: the case for incorporating educational theories of expertise.

Authors:  Sophia K McKinley; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cost analysis and effectiveness comparing the routine use of intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography with fluoroscopic cholangiogram in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Fernando D Dip; Domenech Asbun; Armando Rosales-Velderrain; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Conrad H Simpfendorfer; Samuel Szomstein; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Increasing bile duct injury and decreasing utilization of intraoperative cholangiogram and common bile duct exploration over 14 years: an analysis of outcomes in New York State.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Nabeel Obeid; Chencan Zhu; Mark Talamini; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Population-Based Studies Should not be Used to Justify a Policy of Routine Cholangiography to Prevent Major Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Peter Wysocki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.