Literature DB >> 21459447

Consensus-based evaluation of clinical significance and management of anticancer drug interactions.

Frank G A Jansman1, An K L Reyners, Eric N van Roon, Carolien H Smorenburg, Helgi H Helgason, Marianne le Comte, Brigit M Wensveen, Annemieke M A van den Tweel, Mieke de Blois, Wilma Kwee, Adrian L Kerremans, Jacobus R B J Brouwers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anticancer drug interactions can affect the efficacy and toxicity of anticancer treatment and that of the interacting drugs. However, information on the significance, prevention, and management of these interactions is currently lacking.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical significance of interaction among anticancer agents and comedications and to provide recommendations for the management of clinically significant interactions.
METHODS: Members of a multidisciplinary expert group of hospital and community pharmacists, medical oncologists, internists, and clinical pharmacologists were selected by their professional organizations, which participated in this consensus project. Literature was extensively searched for any drug interactions with anticancer agents using registration files, reference books, handbooks, and electronic databases. Interactions between anticancer agents were not considered. Interactions were classified by level of best available evidence for the interaction and by severity of the clinical effect, according to a structured assessment procedure. This assessment distinguished 5 levels for the amount and quality of evidence available and 6 severity levels for classification of potential drug-to-drug interactions.
RESULTS: A total of 88 drug interactions with anticancer agents were identified from 146 combinations of drugs with anticancer agents found in literature. For 58 combinations, there was insufficient evidence of an interaction. Of the identified interactions, 38 were classified as clinically significant, defined as necessitating an alert or intervention, such as dose adaptation, comedication, discontinuation of treatment, or additional monitoring of treatment. Recommendations were made for management of these interactions.
CONCLUSION: Numerous interactions with anticancer agents are clinically significant and should be considered by pharmacists and doctors in daily oncology practice.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21459447     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  11 in total

Review 1.  Computational and Practical Aspects of Drug Repositioning.

Authors:  Tudor I Oprea; John P Overington
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.738

2.  Checklist for standardized reporting of drug-drug interaction management guidelines.

Authors:  Annemieke Floor-Schreudering; Arjen F J Geerts; Jeffrey K Aronson; Marcel L Bouvy; Robin E Ferner; Peter A G M De Smet
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Evaluation of drug-drug interactions for oncology therapies: in vitro-in vivo extrapolation model-based risk assessment.

Authors:  Nigel J Waters
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Concomitant polypharmacy is associated with irinotecan-related adverse drug reactions in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sasaki; Ken-Ichi Fujita; Yu Sunakawa; Hiroo Ishida; Keishi Yamashita; Keisuke Miwa; Shigehira Saji; Yasuhisa Kato; Yasutsuna Sasaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Potential drug-drug interactions in hospitalized patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paula Stoll; Luciane Kopittke
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-02-25

6.  Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction potential of treosulfan using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling approach.

Authors:  Stephan Schaller; Frederico S Martins; Pavel Balazki; Sonja Böhm; Joachim Baumgart; Ralf A Hilger; Dietrich W Beelen; Claudia Hemmelmann; Arne Ring
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.716

7.  Characteristics of potential drug-related problems among oncology patients.

Authors:  Arjan Bulsink; Alex L T Imholz; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Frank G A Jansman
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-01-03

8.  The Development of Practice Recommendations for Drug-Disease Interactions by Literature Review and Expert Opinion.

Authors:  Justine M Z van Tongeren; S Froukje Harkes-Idzinga; Heleen van der Sijs; Roya Atiqi; Bart J F van den Bemt; L Willem Draijer; Deline Hiel; Adrian Kerremans; Bart Kremers; Marc de Leeuw; Marleen V Olthoff; T Kim-Loan Pham; Ricky Valentijn-Robertz; Kayan Tsoi; Iris Wichers; Maaike de Wit; Sander D Borgsteede
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Modeling and simulation of the endogenous CYP3A induction marker 4β-hydroxycholesterol during enasidenib treatment.

Authors:  Yan Li; Jamie N Connarn; Jian Chen; Zeen Tong; Maria Palmisano; Simon Zhou
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-15

10.  In Vivo Assessment of the Effect of CYP1A2 Inhibition and Induction on Pomalidomide Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Yan Li; Liangang Liu; Xiaomin Wang; Chengyue Zhang; Josephine Reyes; Matthew Hoffmann; Maria Palmisano; Simon Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.