Literature DB >> 21457256

Cost implications to health care payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Teryl K Nuckols1, Elizabeth A McGlynn, John Adams, Julie Lai, Myong-Hyun Go, Joan Keesey, Julia E Aledort.   

Abstract

Objective. To assess the cost implications to payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes. Data Source/Study Setting. Medical-record data from the Community Quality Index (CQI) study (1996-2002), pharmaceutical claims from four Massachusetts health plans (2004-2006), Medicare Fee Schedule (2009), published literature. Study Design. Probability tree depicting glucose management over 1 year. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. We determined how frequently CQI study subjects received recommended care processes and attained Health Care Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) treatment goals, estimated utilization of visits and medications associated with recommended care, assigned costs based on utilization, and then modeled how hospitalization rates, costs, and goal attainment would change if all recommended care was provided. Principal Findings. Relative to current care, improved glucose management would cost U.S.$327 (U.S.$192-711 in sensitivity analyses) more per person with diabetes annually, largely due to antihyperglycemic medications. Cost-effectiveness to payers, defined as incremental annual cost per patient newly attaining any one of three HEDIS goals, would be U.S.$1,128; including glycemic crises reduces this to U.S.$555-1,021. Conclusions. The cost of improving glucose management appears modest relative to diabetes-related health care expenditures. The incremental cost per patient newly attaining HEDIS goals enables payers to consider costs as well as outcomes that are linked to future profitability. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457256      PMCID: PMC3165182          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  50 in total

1.  Treating diabetes to accepted standards of care: a 10-year projection of the estimated economic and health impact in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States.

Authors:  Michael E Minshall; Stéphane Roze; Andrew J Palmer; William J Valentine; Volker Foos; Joshua Ray; Claudia Graham
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  What will it take to make cost-effectiveness analysis acceptable in the United States?

Authors:  Bryan R Luce
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Sumant R Ranji; Kathryn M McDonald; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Vandana Sundaram; Robert J Rushakoff; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Burden of hospitalizations primarily due to uncontrolled diabetes: implications of inadequate primary health care in the United States.

Authors:  Sunny Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Labor characteristics and program costs of a successful diabetes disease management program.

Authors:  Russell L Rothman; Stephanie A So; John Shin; Robert M Malone; Betsy Bryant; Darren A Dewalt; Michael P Pignone; Robert S Dittus
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Cost-utility analyses of intensive blood glucose and tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 72).

Authors:  P M Clarke; A M Gray; A Briggs; R J Stevens; D R Matthews; R R Holman
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Cost and benefits of a multidisciplinary intensive diabetes education programme.

Authors:  J C Keers; H Groen; W J Sluiter; J Bouma; T P Links
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care.

Authors:  Dan R Berlowitz; Arlene S Ash; Mark Glickman; Robert H Friedman; Leonard M Pogach; Audrey L Nelson; Ashley T Wong
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Therapy modifications in response to poorly controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodondi; Tiffany Peng; Andrew J Karter; Douglas C Bauer; Eric Vittinghoff; Simon Tang; Daniel Pettitt; Eve A Kerr; Joe V Selby
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002.

Authors:  Jinan B Saaddine; Betsy Cadwell; Edward W Gregg; Michael M Engelgau; Frank Vinicor; Giuseppina Imperatore; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The effects of quality of care on costs: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; José J Escarce; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Mental comorbidity and quality of diabetes care under Medicaid: a 50-state analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin G Druss; Liping Zhao; Janet R Cummings; Ruth S Shim; George S Rust; Steven C Marcus
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Technology-Assisted Case Management in Low-Income, Rural Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Leonard E Egede; Clara E Dismuke; Rebekah J Walker; Joni S Williams; Christian Eiler
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-07-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.